Jump to content

The St. Mirren FC 2023/24 thread


Recommended Posts

17 minutes ago, craigkillie said:


I'm always puzzled as to how folk can make comments like this. Nobody knows exactly what the player wage budgets are at every Premiership club.

I suspect ours is higher than St Mirren's as a whole, but Saints were willing to pay Brophy a lot more than we were. I do have a feeling a move to St Mirren wasn't quite what he had in mind when he turned down our offer last year though.

I mean it's not exactly top secret or takes Hetty Wainthrope to take a relatively accurate stab at it.

The average wage of top flight first team players gets published every season and although that doesn't correlate exactly to usage of budget or actual budget numbers, it's not a huge leap in logic to say that the wage budgets of each club will tie in pretty closely with the numbers published. The only thing it doesn't consider is squad size of each club but again, you can take a pretty accurate headcount for each team.

There's certainly nothing in those number that would suggest Killie can't compete with us but perhaps the pandemic has taken it's toll massively on budgets at the club since last season.

image.png.ef942fae13be9e2891d1e35d301435f5.png

Edited by djchapsticks
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, djchapsticks said:

There's certainly nothing in those number that would suggest Killie can't compete with us but perhaps the pandemic has taken it's toll massively on budgets at the club since last season.

That hotel they have which brings in 50% of their turnover has taken a big hit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Arch Stanton said:

Every other Ltd Co and PLC will do the same...do your own searching.

A lot of clubs just publish their total wage bill, which includes non-football staff too. For example, Killie's used to include all the hotel staff.

 

5 minutes ago, djchapsticks said:

I mean it's not exactly top secret or takes Hetty Wainthrope to take a relatively accurate stab at it.

The average wage of top flight first team players gets published every season and although that doesn't correlate exactly to usage of budget or actual budget numbers, it's not a huge leap in logic to say that the wage budgets of each club will tie in pretty closely with the numbers published. The only thing it doesn't consider is squad size of each club but again, you can take a pretty accurate headcount for each team.

There's certainly nothing in those number that would suggest Killie can't compete with us but perhaps the pandemic has taken it's toll massively on budgets at the club since last season.

image.png.ef942fae13be9e2891d1e35d301435f5.png

These numbers are not in any way official - they are purely based on guesswork. Also, an "average wage per player" is meaningless given that it "punishes" clubs with smaller squads. The total wage bill is much more useful.

I already said I think our player wage bill will be higher than St Mirren's, but that doesn't mean we'd necessarily want to offer Brophy as much as you are.

 

Edited by craigkillie
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, craigkillie said:

 

I already said I think our player wage bill will be higher than St Mirren's, but that doesn't mean we'd necessarily want to offer Brophy as much as you are.

 

This seems to be regularly missed.  Club X pays more then club Y, therefore players will sign for club x. Or on the flip side club Y has signed a player ahead of club X therefore club Y is spending more.

It completely ignores there a huge crossover between what club Y will pay their highest earner and what club X will pay their lower, or even mid-earners.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, parsforlife said:

This seems to be regularly missed.  Club X pays more then club Y, therefore players will sign for club x. Or on the flip side club Y has signed a player ahead of club X therefore club Y is spending more.

It completely ignores there a huge crossover between what club Y will pay their highest earner and what club X will pay their lower, or even mid-earners.

This is the argument I've raised when people seriously believe we'd actually outgunned Aberdeen or Hibs in terms of money.

We have offered Brophy a wage befitting what we'd see fit for a first choice striker. Aberdeen and Hibs likely didn't feel that the wage we were offering for a first choice player was worth matching or bettering for a guy who for them, would maybe be 2nd or 3rd choice. 

Also realistic to feel that his agent would be after a bit more from the other clubs anyway as he'd be having to relocate. I'd certainly not move to another company 160 miles away if a company nearby were offering me the same money and saving me having to up sticks.

Edited by djchapsticks
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, craigkillie said:


I'm always puzzled as to how folk can make comments like this. Nobody knows exactly what the player wage budgets are at every Premiership club.

I suspect ours is higher than St Mirren's as a whole, but Saints were willing to pay Brophy a lot more than we were. I do have a feeling a move to St Mirren wasn't quite what he had in mind when he turned down our offer last year though.

Out of interest, how much does Rugby Park cost the club to maintain? It really is a shame to see it’s deterioration over the years as it was pretty impressive when it was first built.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Torfason said:

Out of interest, how much does Rugby Park cost the club to maintain? It really is a shame to see it’s deterioration over the years as it was pretty impressive when it was first built.

I'm sure it'll be in our accounts somewhere, but I have no idea. I'm not sure I'd agree about it deteriorating though - I think the stadium is still in pretty good shape. We did some renovations last summer with the new hospitality suite, the two standing sections and various murals.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, NorthBank said:

Foley's situation won't become clearer until we know what Jake is doing. If he goes I reckon Foley is guaranteed to stay.

Is JDH not under contract for the rest of the season? Can’t see us letting him go this month even if he agrees a move elsewhere.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, djchapsticks said:

I mean it's not exactly top secret or takes Hetty Wainthrope to take a relatively accurate stab at it.

The average wage of top flight first team players gets published every season and although that doesn't correlate exactly to usage of budget or actual budget numbers, it's not a huge leap in logic to say that the wage budgets of each club will tie in pretty closely with the numbers published. The only thing it doesn't consider is squad size of each club but again, you can take a pretty accurate headcount for each team.

There's certainly nothing in those number that would suggest Killie can't compete with us but perhaps the pandemic has taken it's toll massively on budgets at the club since last season.

image.png.ef942fae13be9e2891d1e35d301435f5.png

Considering St Johnstone don't make their wage bill public, through accounts or otherwise, I've always wondered quite where these papers get their wage figures from for us.

That's ignoring the fact they guess the amount of players that would be on that wage bill to create an "average".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, djchapsticks said:

This is the argument I've raised when people seriously believe we'd actually outgunned Aberdeen or Hibs in terms of money.

McInnes has also referenced being financially outmuscled for a player over the last week now.

But keep convincing yourself you've not overspent on Brophy, as if it's somehow a personal insult to admit it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, RandomGuy. said:

McInnes has also referenced being financially outmuscled for a player over the last week now.

But keep convincing yourself you've not overspent on Brophy, as if it's somehow a personal insult to admit it.

Don't need to convince myself of anything. Had Aberdeen wanted to make Brophy their first choice striker, they'd have offered him a wage to befit that and we wouldn't have been in the same ballpark.

I don't think it should come as a shock to realise that we're willing to spend more on a first choice centre forward than Aberdeen will be on the same person but with the role of a squad player or backup to their main guy. 

Willingness to spend and ability to spend are different things. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, djchapsticks said:

Don't need to convince myself of anything. Had Aberdeen wanted to make Brophy their first choice striker, they'd have offered him a wage to befit that and we wouldn't have been in the same ballpark.

I don't think it should come as a shock to realise that we're willing to spend more on a first choice centre forward than Aberdeen will be on the same person but with the role of a squad player or backup to their main guy. 

Willingness to spend and ability to spend are different things. 

McInnes says he "didn't have the money to make people think differently" when losing out on players. Also referencing a club willing to "take a big risk" with handing someone a large contract, same as Davidson referenced.

It's quite clear you've spent large of Brophy, and that's fine. Quite how you've decided he wouldn't be first choice for McInnes (fucking Curtis Main is currently first choice) is baffling though, but presumably the only way you can convince yourself you've not overspent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, RandomGuy. said:

McInnes says he "didn't have the money to make people think differently" when losing out on players. Also referencing a club willing to "take a big risk" with handing someone a large contract, same as Davidson referenced.

It's quite clear you've spent large of Brophy, and that's fine. Quite how you've decided he wouldn't be first choice for McInnes (fucking Curtis Main is currently first choice) is baffling though, but presumably the only way you can convince yourself you've not overspent.

I've just offered up reasonings why we are seemingly outgunning historically bigger spending clubs. Now personally, if we are, then that's fine. The fact that we've turned consistent profit in the last 5 years and continue to be well run whilst clubs like Aberdeen are haemorrhaging money will have something to do with it.

No one is denying that we've spent large on Brophy. The narrative coming from some corners though is that we're spending more on him than Aberdeen and Hibs ever possibly could and that's something that is clearly bollocks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, djchapsticks said:

That's something that is clearly bollocks.

Based on your assumption he wouldn't be a regular starter for an Aberdeen side who regularly play two up front, and have Curtis Main as first choice this season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, RandomGuy. said:

Based on your assumption he wouldn't be a regular starter for an Aberdeen side who regularly play two up front, and have Curtis Main as first choice this season.

So we ARE spending more on him than Aberdeen and Hibs ever possibly could?

Thanks for clearing that up. :lol: 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, djchapsticks said:

So we ARE spending more on him than Aberdeen and Hibs ever possibly could?

Thanks for clearing that up. :lol: 

I believe you're paying as large a wage for him as anyone will be spending in the window, in Scotland.

Almost no club is increasing their wage spend for next season due to Covid, apart from St Mirren.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, RandomGuy. said:

I believe you're paying as large a wage for him as anyone will be spending in the window, in Scotland.

Almost no club is increasing their wage spend for next season due to Covid, apart from St Mirren.

Christ - and this is only the one striker.

The next one coming in is going to break you completely. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   1 member

×
×
  • Create New...