Jump to content

Oor Nicola Sturgeon thread.


Pearbuyerbell

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Forever_blueco said:

Any politician up to their necks in corruption or incompetent enough to let it flourish under their regime deserves to be held to account . Couldn’t give a f**k if they are tories , SNP or the Monster Raving Loony party . 
 

it’s quite clear that some in Scotland are happy for some corruption as long it’s based near Arthur’s seat. Bizzare train of thought 

But do you really give a f**k if it's tories, SNP or MRLP?

You're quick to jump in and criticize the SNP but how many times have you stepped into a thread to criticize the tories for being corrupt?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A lot of people are willingly ignoring the climate of MeToo and Sturgeon is completely correct to say if there was any indication that the SNP had attempted to cover for Salmond then she would still be sat there today arguing about the complete opposite. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, NotThePars said:

A lot of people are willingly ignoring the climate of MeToo and Sturgeon is completely correct to say if there was any indication that the SNP had attempted to cover for Salmond then she would still be sat there today arguing about the complete opposite. 

The issue is that they should have investigated it legally. 

They are there to address the Court of Session ruling and the reasons for it not to dream up hypotheticals. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Forever_blueco said:

Knock yourself out 

Just realised that you'll have found them all during your regular searches for "Rangers", so there's no sense in duplicating that work.

Good luck in your quest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, jamamafegan said:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


emoji23.pngemoji23.pngemoji23.pngemoji23.pngemoji23.pngemoji23.png

The desperation from these **** is fantastic.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Desperation he says whilst using 6 emojis..

I'm guessing you didnt watch the opening hour? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Anonapersona said:

But do you really give a f**k if it's tories, SNP or MRLP?

You're quick to jump in and criticize the SNP but how many times have you stepped into a thread to criticize the tories for being corrupt?

Considering I haven’t posted in about 3 years till recently not very often 

are you assuming I am some sort of Tory fanatic ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, NotThePars said:

A lot of people are willingly ignoring the climate of MeToo and Sturgeon is completely correct to say if there was any indication that the SNP had attempted to cover for Salmond then she would still be sat there today arguing about the complete opposite. 

Yup.

I doubt Sturgeon or the SNP care very much about whether the victims receive justice. Their actions were driven entirely by public perception.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, NotThePars said:

A lot of people are willingly ignoring the climate of MeToo and Sturgeon is completely correct to say if there was any indication that the SNP had attempted to cover for Salmond then she would still be sat there today arguing about the complete opposite. 

That's it.

The issue is that he's this powerful figure and been so influential over the whole gov apparatus. If the civil service played to his tune and let him use procedure his way, it would have been seen as a stich up. Imagine the reaction if the Salmond and SNP appointed Lord Advocate dismissed the case after a few months.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Detournement said:

The issue is that they should have investigated it legally. 

They are there to address the Court of Session ruling and the reasons for it not to dream up hypotheticals. 

If it does come down to it that she broke the ministerial code but the public perception was that she done it to try and ensure justice was served to the alleged victims do you think she walks?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, NotThePars said:

If it does come down to it that she broke the ministerial code but the public perception was that she done it to try and ensure justice was served to the alleged victims do you think she walks?

There is zero accountability in modern politics so there is no chance of her resignation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...