Antlion Posted August 18, 2017 Share Posted August 18, 2017 3 hours ago, Colkitto said: His protege Aiden Kerr is trying his best to become an even bigger w****r that Daisley Someone wants to be bigger than that waddling sack of excess whale blubber? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crùbag Posted August 18, 2017 Share Posted August 18, 2017 Daisley could've become one of these guys if he hadn't got his A-Levels.... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jakedee Posted August 18, 2017 Share Posted August 18, 2017 Whether anyone on here likes it or not, Thatcher was hugely popular in Scotland [emoji15][emoji16][emoji23] 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jakedee Posted August 18, 2017 Share Posted August 18, 2017 I million voters in 1979. I would say that was pretty large wouldn't you? Think we've had this discussion before.No one in Scotland voted for Thatcher.25% is hardly "hugely popular". 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NotThePars Posted August 18, 2017 Share Posted August 18, 2017 Stephen Daisley is utterly pointless. Fancies himself as the Nick Cohen or Dan Hodges of Scottish politics not realising, or not caring, that both of them are functionally dishonest and get everything wrong as well. At least someone like Peter Hitchens, or up here David Torrance on occasion, can have a worthwhile view on things. Also it's good to have oaksoft back to pass off the Tory sound bites he's heard on TV or in the papers as his own opinions. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shades75 Posted August 18, 2017 Share Posted August 18, 2017 19 minutes ago, oaksoft said: Still just short of 750,000 Scots voted for her in 1987. That is a massive number. The Labour vote barely moved over that same period. Labour, in 2015, got circa 700,000 votes in Scotland in the GE. Around 50,000 less than Thatcher in 1987. So, if Thatcher was hugely popular in 1987 then so were the Labour Party in 2015. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mjw Posted August 18, 2017 Share Posted August 18, 2017 That is irrelevant You're irrelevant. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ira Gaines Posted August 18, 2017 Share Posted August 18, 2017 Why is the bigot posting again? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Lambies Doos Posted August 18, 2017 Share Posted August 18, 2017 Imagine even giving the guy any publicity. P&B you should be ashamedAn utterly irrelevant individual 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bob the tank Posted August 18, 2017 Share Posted August 18, 2017 Still just short of 750,000 fuds voted for her in 1987. That is a massive number. The Labour vote barely moved over that same period. FTFY 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrewDon Posted August 18, 2017 Share Posted August 18, 2017 He's an objectively shite journalist. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
git-intae-thum Posted August 18, 2017 Share Posted August 18, 2017 7 hours ago, oaksoft said: Why are you not lambasting the selfish b*****ds who bought them up? We do. Most of them are our parents and grandparents. You know. Them that voted no and leave. The greatest generation followed by oaksofts selfish generation. Thats historical judgement for ye. Simples. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeeTillEhDeh Posted August 18, 2017 Share Posted August 18, 2017 Oh f**k he's back - I thought someone had emptied the boring old shit. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DublinMagyar Posted August 19, 2017 Share Posted August 19, 2017 Oaksoft is hugely popular. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fide Posted August 19, 2017 Author Share Posted August 19, 2017 16 hours ago, oaksoft said: Why are you not lambasting the selfish b*****ds who bought them up? f**k up Oaksoft, you utter fantasist. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Lambies Doos Posted August 19, 2017 Share Posted August 19, 2017 f**k up Oaksoft, you utter fantasist. I'm still waiting for proof to his allegation that I previously abused him on this site.His written silence is fairly conclusive. Used to respect his opinions but now just ignore him 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fide Posted August 20, 2017 Author Share Posted August 20, 2017 22 hours ago, John Lambies Doos said: I'm still waiting for proof to his allegation that I previously abused him on this site. His written silence is fairly conclusive. Used to respect his opinions but now just ignore him He has become a parody of himself. An absolute failure of a human being. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jmothecat2 Posted August 23, 2017 Share Posted August 23, 2017 I don't see how any of that is remotely relevant to Daisley, a man who isn't Jewish, deploying his own particular brand of anti-semitism at a deceased Jewish man. What anti-semitism is that out of interest? Not trying to make any point or anything just genuinely curious.I'm not exactly a fan of Daisley but I don't really see the problem with criticising Kaufman over his dangerous and consistently disturbing views on Israel and 'Jewish money'. By being Jewish and saying these things he is giving the goyim all over the country his special Jewish permission to repeat anti-Semitic tropes with their criticisms of Israel. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NotThePars Posted August 23, 2017 Share Posted August 23, 2017 Of course you don't. But a non-Jewish man essentially calling a Jew a useful Jewish idiot is anti-semitism. HTH. Deploying the sort of language he did in his article on Kaufman was disgraceful. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jmothecat2 Posted August 23, 2017 Share Posted August 23, 2017 Of course you don't. But a non-Jewish man essentially calling a Jew a useful Jewish idiot is anti-semitism. HTH. Deploying the sort of language he did in his article on Kaufman was disgraceful. In the context of the story and the (absolutely correct) point he was making I wouldn't personally see it as anti-Semitic but I can see your point. He's certainly got a needlessly crass way of putting it and truthfully I think he should refrain from saying it in such words though as he is implying that is what the anti-zionists would consider him as it mitigates it somewhat. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.