Tam Carson is my No 1 Posted December 18, 2016 Share Posted December 18, 2016 In the build up to the Falkirk goal, the throw in was illegal. The thrower should be behind the line. Basic things that the linesman should be getting right never mind the referee. Glad it never cost us. Shocking decision. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boagheidboab Posted December 18, 2016 Share Posted December 18, 2016 without the falkirk goal we would have been on the same goal difference as dunfermline..who are above us Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
donald Posted December 18, 2016 Share Posted December 18, 2016 Without the Falkirk goal we wouldn't have burst up the park and scored that belter. Very heartening response. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShaggerG Posted December 18, 2016 Share Posted December 18, 2016 1 hour ago, boagheidboab said: Watched the highlights.. great !! Is it possible that the throw in just before sibbalds goal was a foul throw? It's not possible, it's probable and that's without looking at it. Almost all of Hippo's throws are fouls but linesmen seem to be turning a blind eye to it. (Apart from one in the second half yesterday - I was amazed he gave it tbh!) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nowhereman Posted December 19, 2016 Share Posted December 19, 2016 There are foul throws all the time now. Linesmen rarely flag for them Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShaggerG Posted December 19, 2016 Share Posted December 19, 2016 8 hours ago, Nowhereman said: There are foul throws all the time now. Linesmen rarely flag for them So much so that I'm wondering if there's been a change in the law that we've all missed? Maybe somebody ITK like Skyline Drifter or someone may be able to tell us? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shadwell Dog Posted December 19, 2016 Share Posted December 19, 2016 10 hours ago, Tam Carson is my No 1 said: In the build up to the Falkirk goal, the throw in was illegal. The thrower should be behind the line. Basic things that the linesman should be getting right never mind the referee. Glad it never cost us. Shocking decision. No you don't have to be behind the line. If you read the laws of the game aslong as part of your feet are touching the line then its legal. At the moment of delivering the ball, the thrower must: face the field of play have part of each foot on the touchline or on the ground outside the touchline throw the ball with both hands from behind and over the head from the point where it left the field of play Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jan Vojáček Posted December 19, 2016 Share Posted December 19, 2016 I noticed Stevie said post-match that he "never questioned the character of the players" Did he not say that they were a "soft group because they only played when it suits them" (or something along those lines) after the Bonnyrigg game? That would be questioning their character imo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShaggerG Posted December 19, 2016 Share Posted December 19, 2016 37 minutes ago, Shadwell Dog said: No you don't have to be behind the line. If you read the laws of the game aslong as part of your feet are touching the line then its legal. At the moment of delivering the ball, the thrower must: face the field of play have part of each foot on the touchline or on the ground outside the touchline throw the ball with both hands from behind and over the head from the point where it left the field of play I stand corrected then; almost all of Hippo's throws are legal in that case! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
George Parr Posted December 19, 2016 Share Posted December 19, 2016 1 hour ago, Shadwell Dog said: No you don't have to be behind the line. If you read the laws of the game aslong as part of your feet are touching the line then its legal. At the moment of delivering the ball, the thrower must: throw the ball with both hands from behind and over the head from the point where it left the field of play It's on this point that many throw-ins in the modern game become illegal. The amount of players who release the ball whilst it's pretty much in front of their face is extraordinary. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShaggerG Posted December 19, 2016 Share Posted December 19, 2016 2 hours ago, Shadwell Dog said: No you don't have to be behind the line. If you read the laws of the game aslong as part of your feet are touching the line then its legal. At the moment of delivering the ball, the thrower must: face the field of play have part of each foot on the touchline or on the ground outside the touchline throw the ball with both hands from behind and over the head from the point where it left the field of play I stand corrected then; almost all of Hippo's throws are legal in that case! The rule used to be however that the thrower's feet could not cross the line but could be placed on it, therefore the rule must have changed at some point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
albundy Posted December 19, 2016 Share Posted December 19, 2016 throw the ball with both hands from behind and over the head from the point where it left the field of play Very few throw ins are taken from the same spot the ball went out, by letter of the law almost every throw in could be viewed as a foul throw. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
optimistic Posted December 19, 2016 Share Posted December 19, 2016 6 hours ago, Sonsteam of 08 said: I noticed Stevie said post-match that he "never questioned the character of the players" Did he not say that they were a "soft group because they only played when it suits them" (or something along those lines) after the Bonnyrigg game? That would be questioning their character imo. Yeah i thought the same, doh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.