Jump to content

SJFA Social Media....or lack of it.


The Borrheid Bull

Recommended Posts

25 minutes ago, fan of the juniors said:


Not on the Lanark committee bud but yeah your right he is a Lanark fan. Who could forget the year we beat them to promotion despite him doing everything for them bar winning the pointsemoji23.pngemoji23.png. The 2-0 win v them at the Vale was especially sweet

Your correct he stepped down from committee. Although he has been treasurer and president of Lanark and is avid fan of the club. Neutral  haha that's brilliant he has put that on sjfa site.!    He absolutely hates us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 64
  • Created
  • Last Reply
18 hours ago, kilbowie2002 said:

Junior football is run by backward morons, there can be no debating it.

so as your club is a junior club the folk are running it are morons then. Good shout. Is there room for improvements yes. If you think you can do better then get involved.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/12/2016 at 10:02, GLESGABOY said:

And the time that you take is relative to your own club and specifically for your own club. Multiply that by the number of clubs within the relevant association and the effort required to collate any/all information pertinant to all your members,update previous information,engage with any/all external agencies/internal partners and then make sure the information is formatted, posted/issued in a timely manner and then follow up/deal with responses/enquiries generated as a direct result of the information disseminated. Anything less than an exemplary response or service (that was the standard/benchmark set by the poster I was replying to) would be deemed nothing less than failure. The only thing worse than no information is dated/incorrect information, a fact borne out on here by the number of posts that fly up as soon as something wrong/incorrect is posted.

 The time frame required to meet that standard, in my opinion, is correct and based on a service something similar that we provide to a racecourse.

The one flaw, IMO, in your well balanced argument is that junior clubs are run by committees that give their time freely, the SJFA are paid, agreed that a lot of juniors sites etc aren't up to date but shouldn't the lead come from the top and the rest will follow?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The one flaw, IMO, in your well balanced argument is that junior clubs are run by committees that give their time freely, the SJFA are paid, agreed that a lot of juniors sites etc aren't up to date but shouldn't the lead come from the top and the rest will follow?


The issue is that those at the top table consider social media a hindrance rather than a useful tool in getting out information to their member clubs & their fans .
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...