The OP Posted June 19, 2019 Share Posted June 19, 2019 I sometimes wonder at what scale do these things become false flags? Was the Glasgow Airport attack a false flag or was that too shit? That 4x4 looked more like a humvee to me. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BawWatchin Posted June 19, 2019 Share Posted June 19, 2019 (edited) 8 minutes ago, The OP said: Is it a) Improved airline security b) Increased scrutiny of Muslimy types by US authorities c) Better communication between the FBI and the CIA d) All of the freedom fighters being tied up fighting the Americans in the Middle East and their organisations being decimated by death and extraordinary rendition e) The fact no-one would be as passive toward hijackers in the future or f) The US didn't need such a grandiose false flag to do anything else which contravenes international law a) Technology has improved in all aspects of life, including for those who wish to carry out acts of terror b) Sorry, but they don't pull every single black person over to take a peak under their turban. c) Ah, so it happened, because the CIA didn't get a phone call from the FBI quickly enough? d) ALL of them... so they couldn't spare 20 or so to carry out a repeat attack? 20 of them to 3000+ Americans seems like such a good deal as well. e) Yep, we've all seen Passenger 57. Every plane is now fitted with it's own Wesley Snipe action hero. f) No, but getting the general public onside with a lie always helps. Edited June 19, 2019 by BawWatchin 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The OP Posted June 19, 2019 Share Posted June 19, 2019 (edited) 11 minutes ago, BawWatchin said: c) Ah, so if happened, because the CIA didn't get a phone call from the FBI quickly enough? d) ALL of them... so they couldn't spare 20 or so to carry out a repeat attack? 20 of them to 3000+ Americans seems like such a good deal as well. c) In a sense yes. There were was a massive congressional inquest which resulted in a voluminous report and there is a Pulitzer Prize winning book which has been made it into a miniseries currently airing on the BBC which could provide you with a basic outline. d) Al Qaeda's apparent aim (as was the case with ISIS) was to provoke the US into a war of attrition in the Middle East. 9/11 achieved that perfectly. Unfortunately (for them) the war, once it happened, went worse for them than they hoped. ISIS never managed anything on the same scale so never got troops on the ground. Your other responses are too asinine to warrant further response. Edited June 19, 2019 by The OP 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sjc Posted June 20, 2019 Share Posted June 20, 2019 Going out on a limb here, but if the super delegates gerrymander Joe Biden to win the Democratic nomination, then it'll be another 4 years of Trump. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Suspect Device Posted June 20, 2019 Share Posted June 20, 2019 Any danger of this thread getting back on track and laughing at the orange manchild today. We can only hope. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Granny Danger Posted June 20, 2019 Share Posted June 20, 2019 5 hours ago, sjc said: Going out on a limb here, but if the super delegates gerrymander Joe Biden to win the Democratic nomination, then it'll be another 4 years of Trump. There’s no evidence in the polls to suggest this. That said Biden will have more skeletons in his closet than most of his contenders. If Tump is going to be defeated he will be hoping it’s by Biden as Biden will not support any further investigations into Trump once he has left office. I hope it’s not Biden but there’s every chance that it will be. The more things change and all that. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Savage Henry Posted June 20, 2019 Share Posted June 20, 2019 Any danger of this thread getting back on track and laughing at the orange manchild today. We can only hope.It takes a spectacular level of egotism to think that one’s research - in other words, YouTube videos from utter fruit loops and non-peer reviewed gutter press books - means a random P&Ber is closer to the truth than the entire world’s intelligence communities. There’s quite literally no chance our two conspiracy nuts are going to admit to being wrong, so if everyone who should know better would simply dismiss their “opinions” as the regurgitated ravings of lunatic minds, that’d be smashing. We could then get back to the nonsensical ravings of the Commander-in-Chief. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Savage Henry Posted June 20, 2019 Share Posted June 20, 2019 Going out on a limb here, but if the super delegates gerrymander Joe Biden to win the Democratic nomination, then it'll be another 4 years of Trump.Joe Biden has massive levels of support in the non-white male demographics. He’s absolutely a front runner, and may be the least polarising Democrat candidate. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sjc Posted June 20, 2019 Share Posted June 20, 2019 1 minute ago, Granny Danger said: There’s no evidence in the polls to suggest this. That said Biden will have more skeletons in his closet than most of his contenders. If Tump is going to be defeated he will be hoping it’s by Biden as Biden will not support any further investigations into Trump once he has left office. I hope it’s not Biden but there’s every chance that it will be. The more things change and all that. Biden offers American voters nothing different from what Hillary did....this is why Trump won in the first place. More Democrats didn't vote at all or voted for Trump than did for Hillary. Trump isn't the problem, he's a cause of the problem. Saunders would sweep the board if he won the nomination......he'd sadly be ostracised by the Corporate bought Senate & House of Reps once in power. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sjc Posted June 20, 2019 Share Posted June 20, 2019 4 minutes ago, Savage Henry said: Joe Biden has massive levels of support in the non-white male demographics. He’s absolutely a front runner, and may be the least polarising Democrat candidate. More Democrats won't vote than do vote if he's the nominee......just like with Hillary. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BawWatchin Posted June 20, 2019 Share Posted June 20, 2019 7 minutes ago, Savage Henry said: It takes a spectacular level of egotism to think that one’s research - in other words, YouTube videos from utter fruit loops and non-peer reviewed gutter press books - means a random P&Ber is closer to the truth than the entire world’s intelligence communities. There’s quite literally no chance our two conspiracy nuts are going to admit to being wrong, so if everyone who should know better would simply dismiss their “opinions” as the regurgitated ravings of lunatic minds, that’d be smashing. We could then get back to the nonsensical ravings of the Commander-in-Chief. Tell me. Where does this "entire world's intelligence community" get it's intelligence from? Because we all know we can trust the MSM. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sjc Posted June 20, 2019 Share Posted June 20, 2019 1 minute ago, BawWatchin said: Tell me. Where does this "entire world's intelligence community" get it's intelligence from? Because we all know we can trust the MSM. James Corbett from the Corbett Report is very good. Provides links to his sources and is objective too! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
welshbairn Posted June 20, 2019 Share Posted June 20, 2019 5 hours ago, sjc said: Going out on a limb here, but if the super delegates gerrymander Joe Biden to win the Democratic nomination, then it'll be another 4 years of Trump. They won't get a vote in the first ballot at the convention anymore, so they're unlikely to have any effect. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BawWatchin Posted June 20, 2019 Share Posted June 20, 2019 49 minutes ago, sjc said: James Corbett from the Corbett Report is very good. Provides links to his sources and is objective too! I've followed a lot of his reports over the years and although I don't agree with everything he says, he does present challenging evidence that makes it difficult to disagree with him more often than not. His latest addition on youtube is 4 times the US have threatened to stage an attack and blame it on Iran in just the past few years. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BawWatchin Posted June 20, 2019 Share Posted June 20, 2019 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EvilScotsman Posted June 20, 2019 Share Posted June 20, 2019 12 hours ago, Kuro said: WTC and the Pentagon are the only plane crashes in modern history where they apparently didn't find the black boxes https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_unrecovered_flight_recorders 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sjc Posted June 20, 2019 Share Posted June 20, 2019 1 hour ago, welshbairn said: They won't get a vote in the first ballot at the convention anymore, so they're unlikely to have any effect. The super delegates will get a vote in the 2nd round......the increase in candidates makes a 2nd round highly likely. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
welshbairn Posted June 20, 2019 Share Posted June 20, 2019 9 minutes ago, sjc said: The super delegates will get a vote in the 2nd round......the increase in candidates makes a 2nd round highly likely. The last time that happened was 1952, the candidates will start dropping like flies after the first few primaries. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AUFC90 Posted June 20, 2019 Share Posted June 20, 2019 They're explosions. Before the buildings collapsed, during, and after. What about the witnesses? This is what I mean, something is so ingrained in people that the authorities could basically hold up a piece of shit and say this is a gold nugget and you'd argue till your dying day its a gold nugget. You just watched videos where people who were there said there were multiple explosions and then you got to hear some yourself and you're still not having it. There's something wrong with people like you mentally, I wouldn't feel bad if I was you most people are the same, this is why they are able to do such things and get away with it. If a figure of authority tells you something you'll believe virtually anything.Of course there won't be any explosions inside a burning building. None at all. What is more plausible is the American government rigged two skyscrapers with high explosives. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Detournement Posted June 20, 2019 Share Posted June 20, 2019 1 hour ago, welshbairn said: They won't get a vote in the first ballot at the convention anymore, so they're unlikely to have any effect. No candidate is likely to gain over 50% of the delegates so they almost certainly will come into place. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.