Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
John Lambies Doos

Oh Kez!!!

Recommended Posts

16 hours ago, ayrmad said:

I think that was the opinion of the judge.

No the opinion of the judge were no damages were due because Kezia was too stupid to know what she was saying was false, or could reasonably claim to be anyway.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 hours ago, sophia said:

Yes and is perfectly logical.

It's the same principle as pointing and laughing at trolls and those that reply to them on here.

It's not just on Twitter that he's caustic, his blog carries highly charged content.

This episode and his concentration on freaky stuff on Twitter at the expense of his entertaining debunking schtick on his blog means that (coughs) people I talk to on the doorsteps of Scotland see him as suffering a credibility debit that is damaging to him.

That's irrelevant, the issue is whether he was homophobic or not.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, Ad Lib said:

Nope. He hasn't been defamed. It was something someone could reasonably believe to be true and say.

Except for the bit where the judge said he had been of course.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Kuro said:

Except for the bit where the judge said he had been of course.

The judge didn’t say he’d been defamed. He said that the comments were incorrect but that the defence of fair comment applied. Ergo the civil wrong of defamation did not apply.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Ad Lib said:

The judge didn’t say he’d been defamed. He said that the comments were incorrect but that the defence of fair comment applied. Ergo the civil wrong of defamation did not apply.

You've obviously not read the ruling, the judge literally said her allegation was untrue and defamatory.  He used the word defamatory. Ergo, you're full of shit.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Kuro said:

You've obviously not read the ruling, the judge literally said her allegation was untrue and defamatory.  He used the word defamatory. Ergo, you're full of shit.

One can make defamatory statements without defaming someone.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Ad Lib said:

One can make defamatory statements without defaming someone.

Sure.  On ignore.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Day of the Lords said:

Pep taking on Ad-Lib, getting slapped then going in the huff. 

Magnificent 😂

He hasn't read the ruling, and is a fanny.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wing's case wasn't helped by his tweet to his local MP saying "Die you c**t.", and his regular pattern of abuse to anyone he disagrees with. It's telling that the Judge valued the damage to his reputation as being worth £100, even if he hadn't found Dugdale's statements to be fair comment. Judges rightly get annoyed by frivolous cases.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...