Jump to content

Brexit slowly becoming a Farce.


John Lambies Doos

Recommended Posts

51 minutes ago, John Lambies Doos said:
1 hour ago, FlyerTon said:
Do you think the Tories would call another General Election?
I can't see it myself, they'll probably get another leader soon though.
Jezza topping the betting as being next PM, but I somehow can't see that happening either.
https://www.oddschecker.com/politics/british-politics/next-prime-minister
 

Aye, being propped up by SNP

You will see a minority Tory government before a Labour /SNP coalition.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Highlandmagyar 2nd Tier said:

You will see a minority Tory government before a Labour /SNP coalition.

It would not be a coalition.  It would be a minority Labour Government reliant on support from the SNP.

Without a doubt the best of the worst options that can be achieved at Westminster.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Granny Danger said:

It would not be a coalition.  It would be a minority Labour Government reliant on support from the SNP.

Without a doubt the best of the worst options that can be achieved at Westminster.

 

 

At least then, Scotland might see its wish to remain in the single market AND customs union granted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Joey Jo Jo Junior Shabadoo said:

I’d like to see the ‘Brexit we voted for’ defined by one of the c***s who keep going on about it.

 

As I said earlier, even 2 years later the Tories (and Labour for that matter) can't even decide themselves what Brexit means. How the vote before hand can still be considered binding now is beyond belief. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, HTG said:

Scotland is looking for a sensible, inclusive transition to independence. It's the polar opposite of that fiasco down south. The difference couldn't be more marked but the flute fraternity would rather see Scotland down the pan than progressive.  

You do realise that a 'Progressive' Scotland is not immune to going down the pan, or is in itself Scotland down the pan?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Joey Jo Jo Junior Shabadoo said:

I’d like to see the ‘Brexit we voted for’ defined by one of the c***s who keep going on about it.

 

The confusion over this still now is baffling.

Seems fairly clear that it means the same EU status as any other nation who is not currently a member of the EU...? Canada, Brazil, and Fiji, for example. Not EU members. Same shit.

Edited by banana
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, banana said:

The confusion over this still now is baffling.

Seems fairly clear that it means the same EU status as any other nation who is not currently a member of the EU...? Canada, Brazil, and Fiji, for example. Not EU members. Same shit.

None of them are in Europe. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, banana said:

The confusion over this still now is baffling.

Seems fairly clear that it means the same EU status as any other nation who is not currently a member of the EU...? Canada, Brazil, and Fiji, for example. Not EU members. Same shit.

Or Norway? Switzerland? That's what we were told being out the EU could be like. There's some ridiculous revisionism when it comes to what we were told before the vote.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Joey Jo Jo Junior Shabadoo said:

Or Norway? Switzerland? That's what we were told being out the EU could be like. There's some ridiculous revisionism when it comes to what we were told before the vote.

Yes, any of these too, or Zimbabwe or South Korea. But not a member of the EU.

  • Member of the EU
  • Not a member of the EU

...?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Joey Jo Jo Junior Shabadoo said:

Or Norway? Switzerland? That's what we were told being out the EU could be like. There's some ridiculous revisionism when it comes to what we were told before the vote.

Both whom allow freedom of movement, are rule takers and pay lots of money for the privilege of being members of the single market. 

Edited by welshbairn
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, banana said:

Yes, any of these too, or Zimbabwe or South Korea. But not a member of the EU.

  • Member of the EU
  • Not a member of the EU

...?

 

Just now, welshbairn said:

Both who allow freedom of movement, are rule takers and pay lots of money for the privilege of being members of the single market. 

Exactly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Joey Jo Jo Junior Shabadoo said:

Exactly.

:unsure2:

Most non-EU countries on earth have some kind of agreements with the EU. Because they are not in the EU.

The UK would be such a country.

What was voted for:

  • Member of the EU
  • Not a member of the EU

...?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...