Killiefan Posted October 13, 2019 Share Posted October 13, 2019 1 hour ago, robbie1872 said: because your holding company didnt go into admin and fail to have a cva agreed, is there some reason you think these moronic questions would be in any way challenging? Why didn’t you pay the face painter? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dindeleux Posted October 13, 2019 Share Posted October 13, 2019 5 hours ago, robbie1872 said: because your holding company didnt go into admin and fail to have a cva agreed -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cerberus Posted October 13, 2019 Share Posted October 13, 2019 The awards keep rolling in. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nsr Posted October 13, 2019 Share Posted October 13, 2019 Question for Rhobbie: is there anyone anywhere who believes Rangers FC still exists, who isn't a supporter, employee or business partner of the club/company currently playing at Ibrox. I want direct quotes and incontrovertible evidence of non-involvement. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TavTastic Posted October 14, 2019 Share Posted October 14, 2019 (edited) There's your Ross Wilson confirmed. Should be a very decent signing. EDIT: Some interviews with Ross Wilson while he was at Southampton: Edited October 14, 2019 by TavTastic 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Moomintroll Posted October 14, 2019 Share Posted October 14, 2019 There's your Ross Wilson confirmed. Should be a very decent signing. [/url] EDIT: Some interviews with Ross Wilson while he was at Southampton: Until he realises there is no money aside from when googly eyes converts debt into "shares". Even the Columbian Connection would not be so blatant with their momey laundering. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Romeo Posted October 14, 2019 Share Posted October 14, 2019 Courtesy of follow, follow 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bairnardo Posted October 14, 2019 Share Posted October 14, 2019 Courtney of follow, followCourtney eh? Wid?? 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TavTastic Posted October 14, 2019 Share Posted October 14, 2019 45 minutes ago, Moomintroll said: Until he realises there is no money aside from when googly eyes converts debt into "shares". Even the Columbian Connection would not be so blatant with their momey laundering. You're usually a very fair and decent poster so not sure why you think mocking a disability is worth it here. Saw that FF thread. The guy's been getting laughed at over all the shop. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nsr Posted October 14, 2019 Share Posted October 14, 2019 8 minutes ago, Romeo said: Courtney of follow, follow 6. Doesn't pay Her Majesty the taxes she's surely due from her patriotic and loyal subjects. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Moomintroll Posted October 14, 2019 Share Posted October 14, 2019 You're usually a very fair and decent poster so not sure why you think mocking a disability is worth it here. Saw that FF thread. The guy's been getting laughed at over all the shop. You're usually a very fair and decent poster so not sure why you think mocking a disability is worth it here. Saw that FF thread. The guy's been getting laughed at over all the shop.I genuinely apologise for that if I have offended you,but from what I have taken from his Stewardship, he appears to defrauding all of you. I have zero idea what his end game is but can only surmise that it is Money Laundering on a very high level. In the ordinary World, you need to balance the books, shares need to have some fiscal value, especially when they represent loans being translated into shares in the Company. I am fully aware that the person nominally in charge of Rangers is not fit to run my local corner shop based on Companies House guidelines 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
naegoodinthedark Posted October 14, 2019 Share Posted October 14, 2019 Courtesy of follow, follow That’s all really funny, but the use of the word “rich” is my favourite bit. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drew Brees Posted October 14, 2019 Share Posted October 14, 2019 You're usually a very fair and decent poster so not sure why you think mocking a disability is worth it here.Disability!! [emoji23]He’s bossed eyed ffs. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Moomintroll Posted October 14, 2019 Share Posted October 14, 2019 That’s all really funny, but the use of the word “rich” is my favourite bit. The answer is Chelsea & I claim my £5. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bairnardo Posted October 14, 2019 Share Posted October 14, 2019 1 hour ago, TavTastic said: You're usually a very fair and decent poster so not sure why you think mocking a disability is worth it here. Saw that FF thread. The guy's been getting laughed at over all the shop. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TavTastic Posted October 14, 2019 Share Posted October 14, 2019 1 hour ago, Moomintroll said: I genuinely apologise for that if I have offended you,but from what I have taken from his Stewardship, he appears to defrauding all of you. I have zero idea what his end game is but can only surmise that it is Money Laundering on a very high level. In the ordinary World, you need to balance the books, shares need to have some fiscal value, especially when they represent loans being translated into shares in the Company. I am fully aware that the person nominally in charge of Rangers is not fit to run my local corner shop based on Companies House guidelines No I get that you didn't mean anything by it. Plenty to criticise Dave King for with the biggest example being the merchandise f**k-up. That was both entirely foolishly handled and not close to transparent. I don't see any reason at all to believe that the soft loans are money laundering as they aren't getting any short term return or possibly no monetary return at all. I think that's you trying to overstate your case which you don't need to. The soft loans can be criticised in terms of a strategical criticism definitely though. From a retrospective point of view the strategy worked about as well as it could have but that involved a lot of luck and therefore made the strategy high-risk. If Gerrard hadn't guided the team to two EL group stages in a row, which considering how few teams had done that through 4 qualifiers and that we weren't seeded for many of the qualifiers was very unlikely to be achieved even once, then the financial position would be certainly worse with the revenue not increasing much at all. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Moomintroll Posted October 14, 2019 Share Posted October 14, 2019 No I get that you didn't mean anything by it. Plenty to criticise Dave King for with the biggest example being the merchandise f**k-up. That was both entirely foolishly handled and not close to transparent. I don't see any reason at all to believe that the soft loans are money laundering as they aren't getting any short term return or possibly no monetary return at all. I think that's you trying to overstate your case which you don't need to. The soft loans can be criticised in terms of a strategical criticism definitely though. From a retrospective point of view the strategy worked about as well as it could have but that involved a lot of luck and therefore made the strategy high-risk. If Gerrard hadn't guided the team to two EL group stages in a row, which considering how few teams had done that through 4 qualifiers and that we weren't seeded for many of the qualifiers was very unlikely to be achieved even once, then the financial position would be certainly worse with the revenue not increasing much at all. No I get that you didn't mean anything by it. Plenty to criticise Dave King for with the biggest example being the merchandise f**k-up. That was both entirely foolishly handled and not close to transparent. I don't see any reason at all to believe that the soft loans are money laundering as they aren't getting any short term return or possibly no monetary return at all. I think that's you trying to overstate your case which you don't need to. The soft loans can be criticised in terms of a strategical criticism definitely though. From a retrospective point of view the strategy worked about as well as it could have but that involved a lot of luck and therefore made the strategy high-risk. If Gerrard hadn't guided the team to two EL group stages in a row, which considering how few teams had done that through 4 qualifiers and that we weren't seeded for many of the qualifiers was very unlikely to be achieved even once, then the financial position would be certainly worse with the revenue not increasing much at all. Fair enough, not really interested in hounding genuine supporters of any club on here but will call out bullshit when I suspect shittery is occurring. Rangers, The or otherwise, appear to be a fairly decent outfit this season, all joking about sellable assets aside,looks like it might be a close race if your RB learns how to defend to balance his attacking attributes. If I was a Celtic fan I would be a bit wary right now as you appear to have a decent squad that will bury most teams, it might all implode, who knows, but will be more interesting than the last few seasons. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Romeo Posted October 14, 2019 Share Posted October 14, 2019 3 hours ago, Drew Brees said: Disability!! He’s bossed eyed ffs. Sending Bombs through the post and wading about in the blood of Catholics = okay Saying someones ayes are wonky = terrible behaviour *** logic -3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted October 14, 2019 Share Posted October 14, 2019 3 hours ago, Moomintroll said: I genuinely apologise for that if I have offended you,but from what I have taken from his Stewardship, he appears to defrauding all of you. I have zero idea what his end game is but can only surmise that it is Money Laundering on a very high level. In the ordinary World, you need to balance the books, shares need to have some fiscal value, especially when they represent loans being translated into shares in the Company. I am fully aware that the person nominally in charge of Rangers is not fit to run my local corner shop based on Companies House guidelines Firstly when King and co got control he said that they would have to spend between £30 and £50m over the next five years to compete. PnBers spent a few years asking daily, wheres the cash Dave. I'd say that he's fulfilled that with cash for shares. Money laundering at a club which has to publish accounts and is scrutinised by thousands of celtic fans, seriously? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted October 14, 2019 Share Posted October 14, 2019 2 minutes ago, Romeo said: Sending Bombs through the post and wading about in the blood of Catholics = okay Saying someones ayes are wonky = terrible behaviour *** logic No ones actually wading about in blood Romeo but I admire your adherence to whataboutery. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.