DMCs Posted May 21, 2021 Share Posted May 21, 2021 Freemasons at the highest level of the police kiboshing the investigation must be the only explanation. Definitely couldn't have been that hundreds of Celtic fans went greeting to the police over nothing 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Forever_blueco Posted May 21, 2021 Share Posted May 21, 2021 55 literally had Celtic greeting over a rendition of sweet Caroline what a time to be alive 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted May 21, 2021 Author Share Posted May 21, 2021 11 minutes ago, Forever_blueco said: Someone must have at least been thinking it in that room That's enough for me to see them convicted. I have this ardent hope that the first person to be convicted under Humza's "You Cannae Offend Anyone or You'll be Huckled" act of shame will be a Natter whose defence will be, "Ye cannae lift me, I'm Scottish". 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Forever_blueco Posted May 21, 2021 Share Posted May 21, 2021 (edited) This also on twitter aswell . Scottish ambulance service saying they don’t have a clue who the caller claiming to be a paramedic on radio Clyde was Edited May 21, 2021 by Forever_blueco 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LIVIFOREVER Posted May 21, 2021 Share Posted May 21, 2021 Ooh ooh ooh, you're going for TWO. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted May 21, 2021 Share Posted May 21, 2021 celtic fan/s edit a video of Rangers players celebrating. celtic fans are then outraged about those evil sectarian Sevvies, something must be done. Anyone who disagrees obviously condones bigotry. Humza Yousaf did Humza Yousef things. Scot squad swung into action. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jinky67 Posted May 21, 2021 Share Posted May 21, 2021 (edited) 43 minutes ago, Forever_blueco said: This also on twitter aswell . Scottish ambulance service saying they don’t have a clue who the caller claiming to be a paramedic on radio Clyde was That's not what it says though It is saying information provided isn't enough to establish who it was which is something different entirely. Furthermore i doubt it would be information they could share due to GDPR Edited May 21, 2021 by Jinky67 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Henrik's tongue Posted May 21, 2021 Share Posted May 21, 2021 41 minutes ago, Forever_blueco said: This also on twitter aswell . Scottish ambulance service saying they don’t have a clue who the caller claiming to be a paramedic on radio Clyde was Hullo ambulance folk. Theres a guy on radio clyde slaggin us. He’s called Darren. Can you sack him? WATP. Kenny. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orbix Posted May 21, 2021 Share Posted May 21, 2021 4 minutes ago, Jinky67 said: That's not what it says though It is saying information provided isn't enough to establish who it was which is something different entirely. Furthermore i doubt it would be information they could share due to GDPR The guy already shared information to identify himself in his story account. Nothing, if he did actually work for the ambulance service, would see a breach of GDPR if they stated ‘we can confirm the individual works for us’. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D Angelo Barksdale Posted May 21, 2021 Share Posted May 21, 2021 Writing to the ambulance service, absolute weirdos. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jinky67 Posted May 21, 2021 Share Posted May 21, 2021 (edited) 9 minutes ago, Orbix said: The guy already shared information to identify himself in his story account. Nothing, if he did actually work for the ambulance service, would see a breach of GDPR if they stated ‘we can confirm the individual works for us’. They only have a 1st name which isn't enough for them to confirm anything. Furthermore i doubt most organisations would be comfortable confirming any thing like this without an understanding of the intent behind it and the reason that person wants it confirmed Edited May 21, 2021 by Jinky67 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted May 21, 2021 Share Posted May 21, 2021 RANGERS welcomes the outcome of the Police Scotland investigation into a video involving some of our players and staff. Whilst we were confident that no criminality took place, we recognised that we had a duty to assist Police. Furthermore, given some of the attempts to spread false narratives, we had to protect the reputation of individuals involved. This is a stark reminder to those in senior positions within society who should be cognisant of their influence, responsibility and the consequences of their actions on others. We can confirm that we have initiated legal proceedings against certain individuals for comments made this week 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SANTAN Posted May 21, 2021 Share Posted May 21, 2021 1 hour ago, Forever_blueco said: 55 literally had Celtic greeting over a rendition of sweet Caroline what a time to be alive You mentioned it earlier but I don't think it's quite as bad as the hokey cokey patter. That's undefeated. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orbix Posted May 21, 2021 Share Posted May 21, 2021 23 minutes ago, Jinky67 said: They only have a 1st name which isn't enough for them to confirm anything. Furthermore i doubt most organisations would be comfortable confirming any thing like this without an understanding of the intent behind it and the reason that person wants it confirmed How many Darren’s do you think worked that night? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted May 21, 2021 Share Posted May 21, 2021 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted May 21, 2021 Share Posted May 21, 2021 1 minute ago, Orbix said: How many Darren’s do you think worked that night? You're wasting your time, Jinky knows that the Clyde story was bogus but he'll argue otherwise till the cows come home. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Illgresi Posted May 21, 2021 Share Posted May 21, 2021 5 minutes ago, bennett said: Standard Tory scum. *** filth should be kicked out the league imo. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jinky67 Posted May 21, 2021 Share Posted May 21, 2021 (edited) 22 minutes ago, Orbix said: How many Darren’s do you think worked that night? Doesn't matter what i think. Fact is they aren't obliged to provide the information or confirm anything from a speculative email from a member of joe public without understanding that persons legitimate interest in them. If the person wanted to know how many Darrens worked on that night for SAS he could ask them through making a Freedom of Information request. It wasn't you was it? Edited May 21, 2021 by Jinky67 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Henrik's tongue Posted May 21, 2021 Share Posted May 21, 2021 14 minutes ago, Orbix said: How many Darren’s do you think worked that night? 55. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jinky67 Posted May 21, 2021 Share Posted May 21, 2021 12 minutes ago, bennett said: You're wasting your time, Jinky knows that the Clyde story was bogus but he'll argue otherwise till the cows come home. How the f**k would i know if its bogus or not 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.