Follow Follow Rangers 2020/21.

[Cerberus 6,180]

It’s usually horrible to see serfs getting beaten to a pulp by their masters but I would enjoy Rangers playing Wolves.

[The_Kincardine 6,381]

46 minutes ago, Cerberus said:

It’s usually horrible to see serfs getting beaten to a pulp by their masters but I would enjoy Rangers playing Wolves.

The West Midlands is a bit grim but living in Wolverhampton isn't quite serfdom...

[Cerberus 6,180]

I see Rangers drew with Blackburn Rovers.

Is that the first opponents Rangers have played in a friendly that have been almost match fit?
Similarly the first opponents that Rangers couldn’t beat.

[Andre Drazen 5,093]

Anyone who actually watched the Burnley and Wolves sides in question are kidding themselves on if they don't think Wolves are a much better side.

[Grangemouth Bairn 3,522]

2 minutes ago, Warren Mears said:

Anyone who actually watched the Burnley and Wolves sides in question are kidding themselves on if they don't think Wolves are a much better side.

It was only @wastecoatwilly that said Burnley were as good as Wolves mate.

[TheScarf 9,447]

Wolves are miles better than what Burnley were last season. It's not even debatable. 

[Andre Drazen 5,093]

11 hours ago, Grangemouth Bairn said:

It was only @wastecoatwilly that said Burnley were as good as Wolves mate.

Kingjoey seemed to be trying to imply it but at least they had reason to talk up Burnley. 

Worth noting there was no shame getting knocked out by that Burnley side, and Aberdeen feeling that they could have won is a testament to how well they played over the two legs.

[wastecoatwilly 470]

11 hours ago, Grangemouth Bairn said:

It was only @wastecoatwilly that said Burnley were as good as Wolves mate.

Nope,I don't watch the English game all I said was they must have finished in the same position in the league.

[Grangemouth Bairn 3,522]

4 minutes ago, wastecoatwilly said:

Nope,I don't watch the English game all I said was they must have finished in the same position in the league.

You did imply it though. If you don’t watch the English game you won’t have a clue so fair do’s.

[wastecoatwilly 470]

2 minutes ago, Grangemouth Bairn said:

You did imply it though. If you don’t watch the English game you won’t have a clue so fair do’s.

All I did was question the outlook of the rangers fan,I've no idea how good bad or indifferent Wolves are.
He said Wolves would destroy rangers that attitude and the same from McInnes against Burnley beat before a ball is kicked does my nut in.

[Grangemouth Bairn 3,522]

1 minute ago, wastecoatwilly said:

All I did was question the outlook of the rangers fan,I've no idea how good bad or indifferent Wolves are.
He said Wolves would destroy rangers that attitude and the same from McInnes against Burnley beat before a ball is kicked does my nut in.

For what it’s worth I think Wolves would beat Rangers.

I agree with you about the defeatist attitude and in particular talking about McInness seeing Aberdeen’s defeat to Burnley as some sort of victory.

[Andre Drazen 5,093]

2 minutes ago, wastecoatwilly said:

All I did was question the outlook of the rangers fan,I've no idea how good bad or indifferent Wolves are.
He said Wolves would destroy rangers that attitude and the same from McInnes against Burnley beat before a ball is kicked does my nut in.

Burnley got to where they did by being shithouses.

Wolves are a genuinely good football team.

Anyone over the past seasons could tell you the big difference between them and Rangers fans are right to fear them.

[Dons_1988 11,454]

6 minutes ago, wastecoatwilly said:

3 minutes ago, Grangemouth Bairn said:

I agree with you about the defeatist attitude and in particular talking about McInness seeing Aberdeen’s defeat to Burnley as some sort of victory.

He said Wolves would destroy rangers that attitude and the same from McInnes against Burnley beat before a ball is kicked does my nut in.

Jesus wept

[Andre Drazen 5,093]

I suppose willy thought Celtic would beat PSG in Paris last season. 

[wastecoatwilly 470]

7 minutes ago, Warren Mears said:

I suppose willy thought Celtic would beat PSG in Paris last season. 

Wolves are not PSG did you see what you did there?
 

[Andre Drazen 5,093]

Just now, wastecoatwilly said:

Wolves are not PSG did you see what you did there?
 

What's the difference, out of curiosity?

[Andre Drazen 5,093]

I mean... we COULD ignore the nine figures that Wolves have spent in the last two seasons and the free transfers that they're spending a fortune on wages on. The disparity is huge. And you don't want to compare? Sound.

You're thick as f**k though.

[nsr 2,903]

Money is irrelevant mate. It's the will to win that counts. Right willy?

[wastecoatwilly 470]

9 minutes ago, Warren Mears said:

I mean... we COULD ignore the nine figures that Wolves have spent in the last two seasons and the free transfers that they're spending a fortune on wages on. The disparity is huge. And you don't want to compare? Sound.

You're thick as f**k though.

It doesn't matter now.

Edited July 22, 2019 by wastecoatwilly

[TavTastic 402]

Midtjylland it is then unless we get Niederpumped again.

Relatively happy with that as they aren't as good as AZ or Wolves. Does mean being unseeded for QR4 though with Torino, Espanyol, Wolves, Frankfurt, Feyenoord as potential opponents.