Monkey Tennis Posted February 28, 2019 Share Posted February 28, 2019 This worthless idea is amusing. Of course all OF titles in the modern context are utterly hollow, whether we're talking about those when Rangers kept winning them successively because of massive financial advantages, or now when Celtic do. Utterly hollow and of significance only to those with a want of wit. The Rangers ones this century of course have the added issue of being genuinely tainted, as football rules were systematically broken in 'winning' them. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedRob72 Posted February 28, 2019 Share Posted February 28, 2019 There's really not much more of a title race now than when Rangers were in the bottom tier tbh. So more than four then!!? And here’s me thinking I was trying to be just and reasonable. But fair enough I’ll take your word for it, last two have also been worthless! Let’s be honest though, like it or not, a real challenge to their ‘dominance’ isn’t going to happen until Rangers are truly back on their feet. Most punters without an axe to grind would acknowledge that. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bairnardo Posted February 28, 2019 Share Posted February 28, 2019 So more than four then!!? And here’s me thinking I was trying to be just and reasonable. But fair enough I’ll take your word for it, last two have also been worthless! Let’s be honest though, like it or not, a real challenge to their ‘dominance’ isn’t going to happen until Rangers are truly back on their feet. Most punters without an axe to grind would acknowledge that. No, most people acknowledge that no team has any more right to challenge or be challenged than any other. Until Celtic are taken to task for financial skullduggery, their titles carry more credence than several of yours in terms of sporting integrity. The idea that a title is not won on merit because of your interpretation of the available competition is utterly stupid. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnnydun Posted February 28, 2019 Share Posted February 28, 2019 (edited) 1 hour ago, RedRob72 said: Let’s be honest though, like it or not, a real challenge to their ‘dominance’ isn’t going to happen until Rangers are truly back on their feet. Please remind me, many points did Celtic win the league by the season before your original team died? Whilst you were still cheating. Edited March 1, 2019 by johnnydun 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nsr Posted March 1, 2019 Share Posted March 1, 2019 1 hour ago, RedRob72 said: Let’s be honest though, like it or not, a real challenge to their ‘dominance’ isn’t going to happen until Rangers are truly back on their feet. Rangers are dead mate. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snifter Pee Rot Posted March 1, 2019 Share Posted March 1, 2019 Just now, nsr said: Rangers are dead mate. i heard they were cryogencially frozen. Mibbe that's why they think thur no deed. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedRob72 Posted March 1, 2019 Share Posted March 1, 2019 No, most people acknowledge that no team has any more right to challenge or be challenged than any other. Until Celtic are taken to task for financial skullduggery, their titles carry more credence than several of yours in terms of sporting integrity. The idea that a title is not won on merit because of your interpretation of the available competition is utterly stupid. To be fair, I did say most neutral observers. I think that probably excludes you my friend. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedRob72 Posted March 1, 2019 Share Posted March 1, 2019 Rangers are dead mate. Aye, their resuscitation all the more remarkable eh!? [emoji47] 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kent_don Posted March 1, 2019 Share Posted March 1, 2019 Most neutral observers probably shrug their shoulders and walk off. Or silently nod their head and slowly back away so they don’t have to hear anymore of the inane rambling. They probably also prefer a quiet life... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bairnardo Posted March 1, 2019 Share Posted March 1, 2019 To be fair, I did say most neutral observers. I think that probably excludes you my friend. No it doesnt. Eveything you have said is drivel and has been treated as such. You are talking absolute shite. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sjc Posted March 1, 2019 Share Posted March 1, 2019 RedRob in havering pish shocker. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedRob72 Posted March 1, 2019 Share Posted March 1, 2019 No it doesnt. Eveything you have said is drivel and has been treated as such. You are talking absolute shite. The league competition is a procession and will remain as such until the Gers get their house in order, we both know it. Clearly the sooner the better though eh!? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bairnardo Posted March 1, 2019 Share Posted March 1, 2019 The league competition is a procession and will remain as such until the Gers get their house in order, we both know it. Clearly the sooner the better though eh!? The league consists of twelve teams who play eachother in the agreed format. Most points wins. Rangers have no more god given to compte in this structure than anyone else. Rangers inability to compete in one league does not somehow mean that league is devalued. What is it you arent understanding about it? Celtic beat 11 teams to the title each and every season Rangers were elsewhere. Your ill advised beliefs about tainted titles are thankfully superceded by fact and common sense. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kennysmassiveego Posted March 1, 2019 Share Posted March 1, 2019 4 hours ago, WeWereThePeople said: All titles are basically bought, walloper. My bad I should have had the foresight to say illegally bought but most neutrals already knew that tbf . ( for a definition of illegal see HMRC ) 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sjc Posted March 1, 2019 Share Posted March 1, 2019 31 minutes ago, kennysmassiveego said: My bad I should have had the foresight to say illegally bought but most neutrals already knew that tbf . ( for a definition of illegal see HMRC ) The fact that their players were ineligible for 13 years is an even greater issue tbh. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nsr Posted March 1, 2019 Share Posted March 1, 2019 The league competition is a procession and will remain as such until the Gers get their house in order, we both know it. Clearly the sooner the better though eh!? The league was a procession even when Rangers were alive. Those two clubs are two cheeks of the same arse. A league win for one of them is just a league win for the combined arse. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnnydun Posted March 1, 2019 Share Posted March 1, 2019 8 hours ago, johnnydun said: Please remind me, many points did Celtic win the league by the season before your original team died? Whilst you were still cheating. 6 hours ago, RedRob72 said: The league competition is a procession and will remain as such until the Gers get their house in order, we both know it. Clearly the sooner the better though eh!? Im disappointed that you missed out on answering my question. I took the trouble to find out for you. They finished 20 points above you. While your old club was "on it's feet" While your old club had it's "house in order" While your old club was cheating. You now support a diddy club like the rest of us, you are just going to have to learn to accept that you are not going to win the league. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thepundit Posted March 1, 2019 Share Posted March 1, 2019 11 hours ago, Bairnardo said: Rangers inability to compete in one league does not somehow mean that league is devalued. Depends who you ask, I suppose. The television companies certainly thought the league had been devalued. And didn't Lennon and Deila complain that no one was really bothered about their league wins? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nsr Posted March 1, 2019 Share Posted March 1, 2019 1 hour ago, thepundit said: Depends who you ask, I suppose. The television companies certainly thought the league had been devalued. And didn't Lennon and Deila complain that no one was really bothered about their league wins? All that shows is that Celtic fans only care about winning as long as it involves beating Rangers, and vice versa. The rest of Scottish football literally could not care less which one of them outdoes the other. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted March 1, 2019 Share Posted March 1, 2019 1 hour ago, nsr said: All that shows is that Celtic fans only care about winning as long as it involves beating Rangers, and vice versa. The rest of Scottish football literally could not care less which one of them outdoes the other. Spot on, and a truth that will forever evade chaps like thepundit. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.