nsr Posted July 16, 2018 Share Posted July 16, 2018 Drunkardine lost his keys last night and had to sleep in the gutter while drinking rainwater out of a shoe again. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jdog Posted July 16, 2018 Share Posted July 16, 2018 59 minutes ago, nsr said: Drunkardine lost his keys last night and had to sleep in the gutter while drinking rainwater out of a shoe again. Kincardine goes to the shop 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Forest of Dean Posted July 16, 2018 Share Posted July 16, 2018 16 hours ago, Bohemian said: They bite on literally everything, it's great. Especially that bigot and FOD. I've never seen grown adults behave like weans quite like this bunch.. You are so rattled it's glorious 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dindeleux Posted July 16, 2018 Share Posted July 16, 2018 You know we are never going that way again. Rangers are only going one way and you know it and ‘they’ know it. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sugna Posted July 16, 2018 Share Posted July 16, 2018 Is it really necessary to make personal attacks just because you're not in agreement? For example, it seems perfectly in order to poke fun at T-K in a way that mimics his own (sometimes self-parodic) grammatical pedantry; but I'm not sure it adds anything to mock his (often self-avowed) drinking habits. That just looks mean and petty. Not taking sides, it's just an example. Here, I'll have a go at illustrating what I mean: 17 hours ago, The_Kincardine said: Only if you're vapid enough to insist that your vocabulary and eschatology is defined by Hollywood. In your case you probably are. The rest of us suspend belief and accept such simply as entertainment. ITYM "suspend disbelief". 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jdog Posted July 16, 2018 Share Posted July 16, 2018 30 minutes ago, sugna said: Is it really necessary to make personal attacks just because you're not in agreement? For example, it seems perfectly in order to poke fun at T-K in a way that mimics his own (sometimes self-parodic) grammatical pedantry; but I'm not sure it adds anything to mock his (often self-avowed) drinking habits. That just looks mean and petty. Not taking sides, it's just an example. Here, I'll have a go at illustrating what I mean: ITYM "suspend disbelief". Now expect a waffling rant about how he "suspends belief" . 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nsr Posted July 16, 2018 Share Posted July 16, 2018 33 minutes ago, sugna said: Is it really necessary to make personal attacks just because you're not in agreement? I'll have you know I hold The_Drunkardine in high respect. He's by far my favourite alcoholic semi-coherent Sevco supporter. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bairnardo Posted July 16, 2018 Share Posted July 16, 2018 Is it really necessary to make personal attacks just because you're not in agreement? For example, it seems perfectly in order to poke fun at T-K in a way that mimics his own (sometimes self-parodic) grammatical pedantry; but I'm not sure it adds anything to mock his (often self-avowed) drinking habits. That just looks mean and petty. Not taking sides, it's just an example. Here, I'll have a go at illustrating what I mean: ITYM "suspend disbelief".Kincardine is frequently the first one to get personal. So no issues really tbh. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jdog Posted July 16, 2018 Share Posted July 16, 2018 16 minutes ago, Bairnardo said: 51 minutes ago, sugna said: Is it really necessary to make personal attacks just because you're not in agreement? For example, it seems perfectly in order to poke fun at T-K in a way that mimics his own (sometimes self-parodic) grammatical pedantry; but I'm not sure it adds anything to mock his (often self-avowed) drinking habits. That just looks mean and petty. Not taking sides, it's just an example. Here, I'll have a go at illustrating what I mean: ITYM "suspend disbelief". Kincardine is frequently the first one to get personal. So no issues really tbh. This is true, and if you're going to spend all your time on here just being a pretentious condescending tit ,then f**k him. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flybhoy Posted July 16, 2018 Share Posted July 16, 2018 Obsessed 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bohemian Posted July 16, 2018 Share Posted July 16, 2018 2 hours ago, Forest of Dean said: You are so rattled it's glorious Another day another bite, say something bout my weight 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Henrik's tongue Posted July 16, 2018 Share Posted July 16, 2018 5 hours ago, sugna said: Is it really necessary to make personal attacks just because you're not in agreement? For example, it seems perfectly in order to poke fun at T-K in a way that mimics his own (sometimes self-parodic) grammatical pedantry; but I'm not sure it adds anything to mock his (often self-avowed) drinking habits. That just looks mean and petty. Not taking sides, it's just an example. Here, I'll have a go at illustrating what I mean: ITYM "suspend disbelief". He’s a c**t. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ira Gaines Posted July 16, 2018 Share Posted July 16, 2018 Kincardine is an attention seeking bigot sympathising c**t. 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted July 16, 2018 Share Posted July 16, 2018 6 hours ago, Flybhoy said: Obsessed 1 minute ago, Mayor Wilkins III said: Kincardine is an attention seeking bigot sympathising c**t. Give him a choke slam Dom.... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Henrik's tongue Posted July 16, 2018 Share Posted July 16, 2018 3 hours ago, bennett said: Give him a choke slam Dom.... You’re a c**t too. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bohemian Posted July 17, 2018 Share Posted July 17, 2018 Rangers chairman Dave King is to face court-ordered contempt proceedings over a failure to make a judge-ordered £11 million bid for most of the club's shares. It has been confirmed that the Mr King will face a contempt of court hearing at the Court of Session on Friday having failed to comply with a court order to make an offer to Rangers shareholders in March." Another day another court appearance. On the bright side they might meet the next women beating Jon Flanagan while in court. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wastecoatwilly Posted July 17, 2018 Share Posted July 17, 2018 (edited) 25 minutes ago, Bohemian said: Rangers chairman Dave King is to face court-ordered contempt proceedings over a failure to make a judge-ordered £11 million bid for most of the club's shares. It has been confirmed that the Mr King will face a contempt of court hearing at the Court of Session on Friday having failed to comply with a court order to make an offer to Rangers shareholders in March." Another day another court appearance. On the bright side they might meet the next women beating Jon Flanagan while in court. I think their struggling to find directors that will work with dodgy Dave,over 20 in 6 years is good going. Edited July 17, 2018 by wastecoatwilly 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nsr Posted July 17, 2018 Share Posted July 17, 2018 When are they going to weld the gates at Ibrox shut, that's all I want to now. Those gates that everyone walks through to get into the stadium. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kennysmassiveego Posted July 17, 2018 Share Posted July 17, 2018 On 16/07/2018 at 11:11, Flybhoy said: Obsessed Maybe he had something bad happen to him when he was ten ? 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheScarf Posted July 17, 2018 Share Posted July 17, 2018 Flip flops for fuck sake. Unless your at the beach or beside the pool on holiday in Spain or somewhere, they aren't acceptable. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.