Jump to content

Motherwell FC - A Thread For All Seasons


Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Kapowzer said:

O'Donnell is good for a photo with the mascot and refs plus calling heads or tails but that's it.

Saturday was the first time I’d ever seen O’Donnell in the flesh for Motherwell and even allowing for Euros fatigue and playing his second 90 minutes in the space of a few days, I’d still rather we had Richard Tait in the there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, well fan for life said:


Over It Eye Roll GIFwhi

This season, I kind of hoped that they would drop the "we go again" tweets with the zeal that they dropped meaningful match updates. Maybe the rage clicks and white-hot takes in the  replies look good in the engagement numbers...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Allroy for Prez said:

Saturday was the first time I’d ever seen O’Donnell in the flesh for Motherwell and even allowing for Euros fatigue and playing his second 90 minutes in the space of a few days, I’d still rather we had Richard Tait in the there.

Fucking behave. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, ropy said:

I quite like the goal kicks played short to Kelly, we then have a man who can make a pass with the ball.  Teams will find us out though.

Kelly can kick it long from the 6 yard line whothout someone needing to tap it to him.

Using 3 players to take a goal kick is like having 2 men taking a corner on steroids. Get the centre backs up the park. Push the opposition midfield back. Stop fucking about deep in our own half.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Busta Nut said:

I don't get the hate for the two man corners, I think they work awright.

As short corners go, I like the current ones - they're better than the slow floater that the keeper comes out and grabs easily that we specialise in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

People are rightly losing their sh1t over the result and performance v Airdrie. But as usual some of the criticism is way over the top. 

Lawless is a target for sure. Based on last season I get it. But actually he has been one of the better performers and was my MOM v QOS. Give it a rest FFS. All too easy.

Also the criticism of SODs. The guy should not have been playing any of these games. He has not has enough rest since the Euros. Says all about our squad depth that he has played. He probably wants too but needs protected from himself. 

We have a weak squad and we have issues in obvious areas, but I genuinely get pissed off at the vitriol posted at individual players. Especially those that deserve some slack. I have had goes at Lamie and Crawford because I think they are not 1st team material. But it seems everyone is fair game right now 🤷‍♂️🤔.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Allroy for Prez said:

Saturday was the first time I’d ever seen O’Donnell in the flesh for Motherwell and even allowing for Euros fatigue and playing his second 90 minutes in the space of a few days, I’d still rather we had Richard Tait in the there.

I doubt many would agree with you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Busta Nut said:

I don't get the hate for the two man corners, I think they work awright.

What is the point of moving the ball half a yard? it doesn't do anything except make it harder because you have to hit a moving ball.

If they just want to draw opposition players out the box there are much better ways than having two of our guys stand in the corner of the park.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Jim McLean's Ghost said:

What is the point of moving the ball half a yard? it doesn't do anything except make it harder because you have to hit a moving ball.

If they just want to draw opposition players out the box there are much better ways than having two of our guys stand in the corner of the park.

I'm with you on this one, ball played 1 yard to teammate, 2 defenders close to block, corner taker has higher potential to not get cross in, extra hassle and urgency that doesn't exist if the ball is whipped in initially. The only benefit it seems is one extra defender is drawn out to mark the second man and you'd imagine its a forward so the chance of a counter is reduced. Conversely we also have two players opposed to one is the most useless part of the park with two defenders close to negate any additional threat.

Same thing goes for the two centre half's standing 2 yards outside the 6 yard box if it draws the strikers forward and stops bunching in the midfield I get it and if we had central defenders who are composed on the ball such as Aldred and Pete then again passing it forward opposed to the lottery of a 65 yard kick makes a lot of sense.  We all recognise we don't have the personnel to play like this so why is GA persevering as if he has a point to prove or even worse, an ethos/style we wants to impart.

With respect to O'Donnell, perceived fatigue has nothing to do with the fact he doesn't inspire those around him with authority, composure and confidence. Similar to McHugh, he would better serve his teammates by concentrating on his own form which in C&A is decidedly average since arriving.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The big problem is this thread never recommended Lawless or Crawford and yet the club signed them. The P&B Scouting NetworkTM needs to be hired as soon as possible IMHO.

Any zoomers from SO need not apply.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Noticed Burrows on twitter saying some new faces very shortly, a CAM and CB please. As others have mentioned, wouldn't mind seeing Tony Watt as the 10 either.

In addition to this, Ben Banks reporting we expect to make two brilliant additions before Hibs, probably taken from Alexander's press conference. Dean Cornelius out injured as well. 

Edited by Neil86
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What is the point of moving the ball half a yard? it doesn't do anything except make it harder because you have to hit a moving ball.
If they just want to draw opposition players out the box there are much better ways than having two of our guys stand in the corner of the park.

My guess is moving the ball lets you fire in an out-swinging cross with less chance of the ball going out for a goal kick.

Statistically the attacking team will win the first header more times when it’s an in-swinging cross compared to an out-swinging cross but it’s more likely to be a goal scoring chance from an out-swinger. Or at least it was the case about ten years ago when I googled it during a pub fitba argument/debate.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest superward
1 hour ago, Gianfranco said:


My guess is moving the ball lets you fire in an out-swinging cross with less chance of the ball going out for a goal kick.

Statistically the attacking team will win the first header more times when it’s an in-swinging cross compared to an out-swinging cross but it’s more likely to be a goal scoring chance from an out-swinger. Or at least it was the case about ten years ago when I googled it during a pub fitba argument/debate.

Yeah I think that's it. In theory a better angle for an out swinger and also pulls another man out from the opposition. 

But it also pulls someone else out for us. 

If anything I'd just like to see the corners vary. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...