jagfox Posted July 2, 2019 Share Posted July 2, 2019 -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Derry Alli Posted July 2, 2019 Share Posted July 2, 2019 Scott Fox skips leg day. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the_paulo Posted July 2, 2019 Share Posted July 2, 2019 Number 9 shirt with something other than Doolan on the back. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bad chad Posted July 2, 2019 Share Posted July 2, 2019 2-pages on Miller in the Sun, Thistle mentioned about twice. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Walter Posted July 2, 2019 Share Posted July 2, 2019 2-pages on Miller in the Sun, Thistle mentioned about twice.The Sun is tailored to literary requirements of old firm dafties. There's nothing in there for the sophisticated west end intelligensia that frequent Firhill. Don't read it again Chad. It's beneath you. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bad chad Posted July 2, 2019 Share Posted July 2, 2019 1 hour ago, Walter said: 3 hours ago, bad chad said: 2-pages on Miller in the Sun, Thistle mentioned about twice. The Sun is tailored to literary requirements of old firm dafties. There's nothing in there for the sophisticated west end intelligensia that frequent Firhill. Don't read it again Chad. It's beneath you. The paper was in front of me whilst waiting for my coffee, otherwise I'd never have known! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Koop Posted July 2, 2019 Share Posted July 2, 2019 6 hours ago, bad chad said: 2-pages on Miller in the Sun, Thistle mentioned about twice. Evening Times also excels - Miller in Rangers tie and blazer on front page with pointer to Lee Wallace story on the back. Rambling, unedifying tripe for the most part about Kenny and Gary's time together in Celtic and Scotland set-ups. I would ask Jags players not to indulge hacks looking for copy about the Ugly Sisters, especially in contentious matters. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ad Lib Posted July 2, 2019 Share Posted July 2, 2019 Is Caldwell trying to piss the fans off by giving that geriatric the number 9 shirt? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
colliedug Posted July 2, 2019 Share Posted July 2, 2019 Is Caldwell trying to piss the fans off by giving that geriatric the number 9 shirt?Grow up ad lib it's only a number if the little scumbag miller scores constant for us I'll be the first to put my hands up and say i got it wrong but Caldwell knows if this doesn't work out he will probably out of a job and at the end of the day its not my job or your job thats in jeopardy for his actions 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vinnyjag Posted July 2, 2019 Share Posted July 2, 2019 8 minutes ago, colliedug said: 22 minutes ago, Ad Lib said: Is Caldwell trying to piss the fans off by giving that geriatric the number 9 shirt? Grow up ad lib it's only a number if the little scumbag miller scores constant for us I'll be the first to put my hands up and say i got it wrong but Caldwell knows if this doesn't work out he will probably out of a job and at the end of the day its not my job or your job thats in jeopardy for his actions Hit a new low on this forum when one of our own fans calls one of our players (who hasn’t kicked a ball for us yet) a “little scumbag”. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
colliedug Posted July 2, 2019 Share Posted July 2, 2019 Hit a new low on this forum when one of our own fans calls one of our players (who hasn’t kicked a ball for us yet) a “little scumbag”. Vinny i called him a scumbag for previous ventures not ever will i when he wears the red and yellow sorry if it sounded out of context m8 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reid Posted July 2, 2019 Share Posted July 2, 2019 Fee agreed with Norwich for Fitzpatrick according to the Record. £350k plus add ons. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaggyness Posted July 2, 2019 Share Posted July 2, 2019 Fee agreed with Norwich for Fitzpatrick according to the Record. £350k plus add ons.If true I'd hope we could negotiate to get him back on loan this season 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nightmare Posted July 2, 2019 Share Posted July 2, 2019 1 minute ago, jaggyness said: 4 minutes ago, Reid said: Fee agreed with Norwich for Fitzpatrick according to the Record. £350k plus add ons. If true I'd hope we could negotiate to get him back on loan this season Would imagine they’ll want to stick him in their youth team so they can have a closer look at what they’ve got. It’s a decent sum for a player who hasn’t done much yet, but I can’t help but feel disappointed by that fee. So much potential there. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fuctifano Posted July 2, 2019 Share Posted July 2, 2019 The younger the player is the more difficult it is to call- if he goes on and has 70 caps for Scotland and 20 goals with a commensurate career in England and we make £1m from add ons then it's obviously shite compared to what we could have won (in a bullseye stylee), but if he does a Martin Lauchlan and totally bombs then £350k for an 18 year old is probably decent enough. I'm more accepting about this than I was about Lindsay as Lindsay had already proved himself at a higher level and was 21 when he left us. Or we could just wait til Chien Lee buys him back in 10 days time... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reid Posted July 2, 2019 Share Posted July 2, 2019 The younger the player is the more difficult it is to call- if he goes on and has 70 caps for Scotland and 20 goals with a commensurate career in England and we make £1m from add ons then it's obviously shite compared to what we could have won (in a bullseye stylee), but if he does a Martin Lauchlan and totally bombs then £350k for an 18 year old is probably decent enough. I'm more accepting about this than I was about Lindsay as Lindsay had already proved himself at a higher level and was 21 when he left us. Or we could just wait til Chien Lee buys him back in 10 days time...I agree with this. Lindsay had shown himself to be a very good top division player. Fitzpatrick has shown flashes in the second tier. Was hoping for slightly more but not a terrible deal. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cilitbang Posted July 2, 2019 Share Posted July 2, 2019 I liked Fitzpatrick as he was direct and fearless, so having to replace him will be meh. Wonder if Caldwell was after Shankland? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jag4life Posted July 3, 2019 Share Posted July 3, 2019 Surely getting the chance to play in our championship is better development than sticking him in the under 23’s.I would think Fitzy would of preferred that also.We should of demanded an immediate loan back in the deal.Poor again in my opinion as his style will be hard to replace 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thisal Posted July 3, 2019 Share Posted July 3, 2019 15 hours ago, Dr Koop said: Evening Times also excels - Miller in Rangers tie and blazer on front page with pointer to Lee Wallace story on the back. Rambling, unedifying tripe for the most part about Kenny and Gary's time together in Celtic and Scotland set-ups. I would ask Jags players not to indulge hacks looking for copy about the Ugly Sisters, especially in contentious matters. I've been told what normally happens is ex OF player is interviewed for an an hour about his current diddy team then at the end is asked a throwaway question about his time at the old firm. When the article is published it's comprises of his answer to the OF question 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arnold Layne Posted July 3, 2019 Share Posted July 3, 2019 23 minutes ago, Jag4life said: Surely getting the chance to play in our championship is better development than sticking him in the under 23’s. I would think Fitzy would of preferred that also. We should of demanded an immediate loan back in the deal. Poor again in my opinion as his style will be hard to replace would've, should've, would have, should have. Sorry if it seems pedantic but it's important to me. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.