Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Poet of the Macabre

Mr Doncaster

Recommended Posts

I'm asking the questions here.

Incidentally, I notice you edited out my question regards motherwell cutting rangers ticket allocation. Funny you'd do that.

No one has said they didn't bit he play off is. Different scenario , hibs also cut our allocation for the play off but not for the games this seaon now again why don't you answer my question do you genuinley believe Motherwell are going to cut our allocation for next season , yes or no? Edited by forever_blue

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No one has said they didn't bit he play off is. Different scenario , hibs also cut our allocation for the play off but not for the games this seaon now again why don't you answer my question do you genuinley believe Motherwell are going to cut our allocation for next season , yes or no?

I don't need to answer the question now.

You've acknowledged, yourself, that teams have actually cut the allocation they could provide.

Demonstrates, right there, they don't put the same value on the blue pound, as you guys do.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't need to answer the question now.

You've acknowledged, yourself, that teams have actually cut the allocation they could provide.

Demonstrates, right there, they don't put the same value on the blue pound, as you guys do.

There was a variety of reasons play off allocation were cut , one probably being that tickets were set at 15 quid rather than. Say the usual 28 pound we have to shell out at easter road , had that been the case then the cynical person inside me thinks our allocation would have remained the same

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

All I see is 54... 54...54... 54...

Very good , that's you acknowledging our history remains , sometimes releasing the truth can work wonders for the soul

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Very good , that's you acknowledging our history remains , sometimes releasing the truth can work wonders for the soul

 

Remains?  Yes.  Continues?  Only partly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That sounds like abuse, you should contact the care commission.

I would but Dave and aofjay are constantly clogging up the line just to ask "if ranjurs are deid"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Honestly, what difference does it make whether Celtic or Rangers win the league? #twocheeks #samearse

 

It doesn't.  Like you've sort of said above, they're the one entity in most peoples minds.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
That there's genuine bonhomie between we Bears on here is admirable.  I put it down to us being the few posters who talk sense and aren't burdened by the need to talk in cliches.

 

WATP ;)

Have a wee word with fb about the avoidance of cliches. I fear he missed the memo.

We welcome the chase.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Very good , that's you acknowledging our history remains , sometimes releasing the truth can work wonders for the soul

Old Rangers history indeed remains.

But it stopped in 2012.

The 54 titles can not be added to by the new outfit. Their history started with a match at Glebe Park.

If there was any hint of justice in Scottish football 4 or 5 titles would be voided for incorrect registrations. (Systematic Cheating to give it its proper name)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Old Rangers history indeed remains.

But it stopped in 2012.

The 54 titles can not be added to by the new outfit. Their history started with a match at Glebe Park.

If there was any hint of justice in Scottish football 4 or 5 titles would be voided for incorrect registrations. (Systematic Cheating to give it its proper name)

^^^^tears

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Old Rangers history indeed remains.

But it stopped in 2012.

The 54 titles can not be added to by the new outfit. Their history started with a match at Glebe Park.

If there was any hint of justice in Scottish football 4 or 5 titles would be voided for incorrect registrations. (Systematic Cheating to give it its proper name)

SDM/Charles Green/Craig Whyte knew...

Edited by Joe schmo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Every club should cut this mobs allocation but to offset any financial losses we should charge the mugs £40 a pop to watch their beloved fantasy team.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Old Rangers history indeed remains.

But it stopped in 2012.

The 54 titles can not be added to by the new outfit. Their history started with a match at Glebe Park.

If there was any hint of justice in Scottish football 4 or 5 titles would be voided for incorrect registrations. (Systematic Cheating to give it its proper name)

 

:lol: meanwhile in the real world according to uefa, eca, sfa and spfl we are officially the same club, you bleating and moaning and pish talking is not going to change that

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Every club should cut this mobs allocation but to offset any financial losses we should charge the mugs £40 a pop to watch their beloved fantasy team.

financial losses :lol:  we have been subsidising your income despite being in a different league for the last four years, the tv deal was only agreed because it included us, no need to thank us

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

financial losses :lol: we have been subsidising your income despite being in a different league for the last four years, the tv deal was only agreed because it included us, no need to thank us

We all subsidised your cheating prior to liquidation.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
financial losses :lol:  we have been subsidising your income despite being in a different league for the last four years, the tv deal was only agreed because it included us, no need to thank us

Explain this notion of subsidy in this context for me please.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Lord Nimmo gave his verdict of what was in front of him at the time, would he reach the same opinion here in now, i very much doubt that.

And what has happened to change his mind?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...