forever_blue Posted April 7, 2016 Share Posted April 7, 2016 I'm asking the questions here. Incidentally, I notice you edited out my question regards motherwell cutting rangers ticket allocation. Funny you'd do that. No one has said they didn't bit he play off is. Different scenario , hibs also cut our allocation for the play off but not for the games this seaon now again why don't you answer my question do you genuinley believe Motherwell are going to cut our allocation for next season , yes or no? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave.j Posted April 7, 2016 Share Posted April 7, 2016 No one has said they didn't bit he play off is. Different scenario , hibs also cut our allocation for the play off but not for the games this seaon now again why don't you answer my question do you genuinley believe Motherwell are going to cut our allocation for next season , yes or no? I don't need to answer the question now. You've acknowledged, yourself, that teams have actually cut the allocation they could provide. Demonstrates, right there, they don't put the same value on the blue pound, as you guys do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The DA Posted April 7, 2016 Share Posted April 7, 2016 That's me waiting on number 55 , not long now All I see is 54... 54...54... 54... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
forever_blue Posted April 7, 2016 Share Posted April 7, 2016 I don't need to answer the question now. You've acknowledged, yourself, that teams have actually cut the allocation they could provide. Demonstrates, right there, they don't put the same value on the blue pound, as you guys do. There was a variety of reasons play off allocation were cut , one probably being that tickets were set at 15 quid rather than. Say the usual 28 pound we have to shell out at easter road , had that been the case then the cynical person inside me thinks our allocation would have remained the same Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
forever_blue Posted April 7, 2016 Share Posted April 7, 2016 All I see is 54... 54...54... 54... Very good , that's you acknowledging our history remains , sometimes releasing the truth can work wonders for the soul Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The DA Posted April 7, 2016 Share Posted April 7, 2016 Very good , that's you acknowledging our history remains , sometimes releasing the truth can work wonders for the soul Remains? Yes. Continues? Only partly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
forever_blue Posted April 7, 2016 Share Posted April 7, 2016 Don't you go outside at all ? Only when the carer allows me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
forever_blue Posted April 7, 2016 Share Posted April 7, 2016 That sounds like abuse, you should contact the care commission. I would but Dave and aofjay are constantly clogging up the line just to ask "if ranjurs are deid" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheScarf Posted April 7, 2016 Share Posted April 7, 2016 Honestly, what difference does it make whether Celtic or Rangers win the league? #twocheeks #samearse It doesn't. Like you've sort of said above, they're the one entity in most peoples minds. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted April 7, 2016 Share Posted April 7, 2016 That there's genuine bonhomie between we Bears on here is admirable. I put it down to us being the few posters who talk sense and aren't burdened by the need to talk in cliches. WATP Have a wee word with fb about the avoidance of cliches. I fear he missed the memo. We welcome the chase. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ken Fitlike Posted April 7, 2016 Share Posted April 7, 2016 Very good , that's you acknowledging our history remains , sometimes releasing the truth can work wonders for the soul Old Rangers history indeed remains. But it stopped in 2012. The 54 titles can not be added to by the new outfit. Their history started with a match at Glebe Park. If there was any hint of justice in Scottish football 4 or 5 titles would be voided for incorrect registrations. (Systematic Cheating to give it its proper name) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
forever_blue Posted April 7, 2016 Share Posted April 7, 2016 Old Rangers history indeed remains. But it stopped in 2012. The 54 titles can not be added to by the new outfit. Their history started with a match at Glebe Park. If there was any hint of justice in Scottish football 4 or 5 titles would be voided for incorrect registrations. (Systematic Cheating to give it its proper name) ^^^^tears Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe schmo Posted April 7, 2016 Share Posted April 7, 2016 Old Rangers history indeed remains. But it stopped in 2012. The 54 titles can not be added to by the new outfit. Their history started with a match at Glebe Park. If there was any hint of justice in Scottish football 4 or 5 titles would be voided for incorrect registrations. (Systematic Cheating to give it its proper name) SDM/Charles Green/Craig Whyte knew... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeyWellFan Posted April 7, 2016 Share Posted April 7, 2016 Every club should cut this mobs allocation but to offset any financial losses we should charge the mugs £40 a pop to watch their beloved fantasy team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nacho Posted April 7, 2016 Share Posted April 7, 2016 Old Rangers history indeed remains. But it stopped in 2012. The 54 titles can not be added to by the new outfit. Their history started with a match at Glebe Park. If there was any hint of justice in Scottish football 4 or 5 titles would be voided for incorrect registrations. (Systematic Cheating to give it its proper name) meanwhile in the real world according to uefa, eca, sfa and spfl we are officially the same club, you bleating and moaning and pish talking is not going to change that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nacho Posted April 7, 2016 Share Posted April 7, 2016 Every club should cut this mobs allocation but to offset any financial losses we should charge the mugs £40 a pop to watch their beloved fantasy team. financial losses we have been subsidising your income despite being in a different league for the last four years, the tv deal was only agreed because it included us, no need to thank us Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shades75 Posted April 7, 2016 Share Posted April 7, 2016 financial losses we have been subsidising your income despite being in a different league for the last four years, the tv deal was only agreed because it included us, no need to thank us We all subsidised your cheating prior to liquidation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted April 7, 2016 Share Posted April 7, 2016 financial losses we have been subsidising your income despite being in a different league for the last four years, the tv deal was only agreed because it included us, no need to thank us Explain this notion of subsidy in this context for me please. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
forever_blue Posted April 7, 2016 Share Posted April 7, 2016 We all subsidised your cheating prior to liquidation. "No sporting advantaged was gained" lord nimmo smith Or was he corrupt anaw Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
forever_blue Posted April 7, 2016 Share Posted April 7, 2016 Lord Nimmo gave his verdict of what was in front of him at the time, would he reach the same opinion here in now, i very much doubt that.And what has happened to change his mind? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.