Jump to content

Hampden Park has it had its Day ?


Recommended Posts

After sitting in the South Stand tonight it was clear that the pitch could be moved several yards towards that stand as part of any redesign to offer more development room around the North Stand in particular. That would also improve the view from the South Stand which although pitchside is still a long way from the action. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, bendan said:

We should have an architectural competition to  redesign the E/W/N of the stadium. Seeing some options would be good. If we could get behind a specific idea then funding becomes a little bit easier. 

I'd propose extending the top tier of the South Stand right around the back of the East and West stands, while bringing the lower tiers towards the pitch. Similar to what was done in Stuttgart. 

hampden1.jpg

Edited by Lurkst
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
10 hours ago, Lurkst said:

In answer to the OP.....NO!

 

Yes it has many flaws, but on occasions like tonight it can be a phenomenal football stadium. 

 

Sorry but this is nonsense. What is phenomenal about it? The seats miles away from the pitch, the terrible gradient that also affects the acoustics too? It was a great atmosphere in spite of the stadiums terrible design.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Being an Englishman who visits Scotland regularly, Hampden is like many old stadiums, brilliant when terracing,but just a bodge up with seating. Surely the best answer is to knock it down and start again - to create a magnificent national stadium. Maybe naming rights could help reduce the costs to the SFA, only an idea. Possibly cheaper than lifting the roof etc etc ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 21/11/2021 at 18:48, Andy groundhopper said:

Being an Englishman who visits Scotland regularly, Hampden is like many old stadiums, brilliant when terracing,but just a bodge up with seating. Surely the best answer is to knock it down and start again - to create a magnificent national stadium. Maybe naming rights could help reduce the costs to the SFA, only an idea. Possibly cheaper than lifting the roof etc etc ?

Spot on! It's the same old terracing in the east and west stands from back in the day when seats were bolted on to comply with the legislation on the cheap, wasn't suitable then and most definitely not suitable now. The only option is knock it down start again with behind the goals as a minimum. 

With the exception of the south stand Hampden has to be one of the poorest stadiums used for major international matches in Europe now.

Where does the money come from? Well how has every other stadium been developed throughout the world over the years? The SFA has hidden behind the mantra of we can't invest as it's not ours for over 100 years...so now what's the plan Mr SFA blazer man?

In my experience over 40+ years of visiting, It's always been the fans that created the exceptional atmosphere not the stadium even when it was a bigger dump than it is now!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 21/11/2021 at 18:48, Andy groundhopper said:

Being an Englishman who visits Scotland regularly, Hampden is like many old stadiums, brilliant when terracing,but just a bodge up with seating. Surely the best answer is to knock it down and start again - to create a magnificent national stadium. Maybe naming rights could help reduce the costs to the SFA, only an idea. Possibly cheaper than lifting the roof etc etc ?

It’s easy for people to say knock it down and rebuild it without asking where the money will come from to do this.

The SFA ain’t exactly swimming in cash 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Clown Job said:

It’s easy for people to say knock it down and rebuild it without asking where the money will come from to do this.

The SFA ain’t exactly swimming in cash 

How come other countries can build stadiums? The new stadium would be a commercial enterprise. It would have investors. And the Government could contribute.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How come other countries can build stadiums? The new stadium would be a commercial enterprise. It would have investors. And the Government could contribute.


there are already two other big stadia in Glasgow and another, even bigger one, in Edinburgh as well as the hydro so the market for large event venues is crowded.

The business case for investors is going to be a tough sell
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Other countries are sovereign.
Although the existence of Wales suggests that there may be slightly more to it than that

Of course the Welsh FA had to accept the indignity of playing important matches within 40 miles of the nation's capital and cooperating with Rugby so the SFA are clearly the real winners here
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 30/11/2021 at 19:29, topcat(The most tip top) said:

Although the existence of Wales suggests that there may be slightly more to it than that

Of course the Welsh FA had to accept the indignity of playing important matches within 40 miles of the nation's capital and cooperating with Rugby so the SFA are clearly the real winners here

Correct. I was thinking of 'foreign' countries.  If I had thought it through, after dashing off my trite comment, I would have realised that neither Wales nor England are sovereign countries.

Edited by cyderspaceman
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Absolutely yes. 

It's a dive. The distance from the seats to the pitch are too far and it's just horrible. The hospitality areas aren't bad though, to be fair. 

Went to see Springsteen at Hampden a few years back, the gig was sensational, as it's Springsteen, but the sound wasn't brilliant, due to the fact that it wasn't built up, like Murrayfield is. Stadium gigs in Glasgow should be at Celtic Park or Ibrox. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Absolutely yes. 

It's a dive. The distance from the seats to the pitch are too far and it's just horrible. The hospitality areas aren't bad though, to be fair. 

Went to see Springsteen at Hampden a few years back, the gig was sensational, as it's Springsteen, but the sound wasn't brilliant, due to the fact that it wasn't built up, like Murrayfield is. Stadium gigs in Glasgow should be at Celtic Park or Ibrox. 

When in the year would you be able to have concerts at Ibrox or Celtic Park?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In short, Hampden is shite, "someone" will come up with £800 million for a new ground, somewhere near Stirling, with its Trumpton railway station. Surely "someone" out there can follow this up?

I wonder how many experts on here have actually been to major grounds outside Scotland. People abroad just accept that they won't be back in their equivalent of Inverwalloper 20 minutes after the game.

Try to get anywhere from Murrayfield or even Ibrox or Parkhead after a full house.  70,000 head to Haymarket Station at 10pm after a midweek game. 65,00 are still there the next morning.

Edited by Hampden Diehard
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...