Jump to content

General Politics Thread


Granny Danger

Recommended Posts

I have long maintained MPs should be paid the national average wage, reviewed yearly, plus expenses. With no possibility to advise private companies or in any way have a potential conflict of interest with those of your constituents.
Then we'll generally end up with less than average people running the country. I'm not really sure that's something we should be wishing for.

Also, it's impossible to rule out conflicts of interest, we're not exactly a nation of ascetics.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, 101 said:

Labour don't have a stream of hard nosed trade union folk coming through with a history of getting stuff done. Politics now seems to be the reserve of largely talentless people which is a shame.

Politics is full of people who go to university, do a politics degree, come out and work in politics in some fashion, then want to become an MP. No experience of life outside out their 'political bubble'. Completely unsuited to actually being an MP.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, DiegoDiego said:

Then we'll generally end up with less than average people running the country. I'm not really sure that's something we should be wishing for.

Aye, just imagine what that would be like.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Soapy FFC said:

Politics is full of people who go to university, do a politics degree, come out and work in politics in some fashion, then want to become an MP. No experience of life outside out their 'political bubble'. Completely unsuited to actually being an MP.

No experience of life, other than of course all their experiences from childhood, family, friends, being a student and in most cases working on the side as well. Before getting a qualification in the field that they'd like to participate in.

Aye that's a total scandal M8. Better off with Senga the hairdresser from two streets doing the job instead.

Edited by vikingTON
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, NotThePars said:

This is a deliberate choice that happened in line with loads of economic levers being phased out of democratic political control. Politics is supposed to be alienating and out of touch with ordinary people now. 

If they wanted to alienate ordinary people then they could have given reps from the EIS or RMT the nod. They're hardly tribunes of the plebs themselves. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Soapy FFC said:

Politics is full of people who go to university, do a politics degree, come out and work in politics in some fashion, then want to become an MP. No experience of life outside out their 'political bubble'. Completely unsuited to actually being an MP.

That depends on what you want an MP to be. At present, it’s a job, and so people study for it, gain degrees, and go into the field hoping for success. You could argue that it shouldn’t be a career, but it is one at the moment. No one complains about teachers having no experience outside of their “teaching bubble” or lawyers having no experience outside of the “legal bubble”, so I don’t think we can hold politicians to a different standard. It’s pretty much the same the whole world over, but the UK in particular requires a comprehensive education just to understand its archaic practices and vagaries. The whole political system here was set up from the start to keep the plebs and the uninitiated out. We can’t really blame people who hope to progress in the system for accepting its realities and working within them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Soapy FFC said:

Politics is full of people who go to university, do a politics degree, come out and work in politics in some fashion, then want to become an MP. No experience of life outside out their 'political bubble'. Completely unsuited to actually being an MP.

I must be missing something.

If somebody goes to university, does a degree in medicine, then goes to work in a hospital.  Does that make them unsuitable to be a surgeon?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the point is that if someone goes to uni, studies politics and centres their social life around the Young <insert party>, then gets a job as a political adviser and works their way up to being an MP, their entire adult life experience is dominated by interactions with other party members and the political machine, most of whom have shared the same pathway. As well as their work, their outside of work life also becomes dominated by party meetings, fundraisers and social events. Its then almost inevitable that they get caught up in the ideological group-think of that party and view every issue through a party political lens. 

The rest of us, including @Fullerene's surgeon and @Antlion's teacher and lawyer will work with and socialise with folk with a range of political and social views and life experiences. This arguably makes them better surgeons, lawyers and teachers and would do the same for politicians.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Arabdownunder said:

I think the point is that if someone goes to uni, studies politics and centres their social life around the Young <insert party>, then gets a job as a political adviser and works their way up to being an MP, their entire adult life experience is dominated by interactions with other party members and the political machine, most of whom have shared the same pathway. As well as their work, their outside of work life also becomes dominated by party meetings, fundraisers and social events. Its then almost inevitable that they get caught up in the ideological group-think of that party and view every issue through a party political lens. 

The rest of us, including @Fullerene's surgeon and @Antlion's teacher and lawyer will work with and socialise with folk with a range of political and social views and life experiences. This arguably makes them better surgeons, lawyers and teachers and would do the same for politicians.

What would prevent young prospective politicians from socialising in the same fashion as everyone else?

Why would high performing individuals, as an inevitably, succumb to group-think and does relative youth exacerbate this?

If the answers are nothing, they don't and no, I'm afraid to say that you may well be edging towards territory inhabited by the stereotypical da.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Arabdownunder said:

I think the point is that if someone goes to uni, studies politics and centres their social life around the Young <insert party>, then gets a job as a political adviser and works their way up to being an MP, their entire adult life experience is dominated by interactions with other party members and the political machine, most of whom have shared the same pathway. As well as their work, their outside of work life also becomes dominated by party meetings, fundraisers and social events. Its then almost inevitable that they get caught up in the ideological group-think of that party and view every issue through a party political lens. 

The rest of us, including @Fullerene's surgeon and @Antlion's teacher and lawyer will work with and socialise with folk with a range of political and social views and life experiences. This arguably makes them better surgeons, lawyers and teachers and would do the same for politicians.

What actual evidence do you have to support the claim that people who study Politics and then become an elected politician have no shared 'life experience' with others? 

Doctors are arguably much more cliquey when it comes to completing their demanding and specialised set of medical exams, than a Politics undergrad who most likely only takes that specialism after two/three years of fannying around the Student Union and completing a selection of Humanities/Social Sciences courses first. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BigDoddyKane said:

I would say its a balance thats probably needed, if nowadays nearly every mp is following the same route thats the problem. Not so much what route it is

You get a balance of cliquey weirdos and normal folk, I reckon, in any walk of life and in any occupation. No doubt we’ve all known gimps who tried to get into politics at school or Uni and went on to become the arse-kissing cultists who are all over social media trying to promote their local candidate (I actually find this with Labour more than most, but maybe that says something about where I went to school/Uni). However, I also know politically-active members of parties/politicians (including Labour) who are normal people who occasionally socialise with work folk.

Politics has basically become professionalised, like a lot of jobs and sectors. You can argue either way whether it’s a good or a bad thing, but it’s a thing. No point criticising the folk who see it for the viable career path which, currently, it is.*

* Unless they’re ermine-chasing Tories, in which case they can go and suck off landmines.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...