Jump to content

General Politics Thread


Granny Danger

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, strichener said:

I don't disagree with the sentiment although it has noting to do with Baxter's claim that it was all caused by the bankers.  I do however call into question the part highlighted as this looks far too high.  What is your source for this amount as the latest figures from the Scottish Government is 2015/16 and stood at £2.8bln.  If it were as high as you are stating, Scotland would be paying over 12% of expenditure on debt interest.

Off the top of my head used £1.8t as debt and applied your 0.0573 figure and a rough population share.

Even at 3% it's £4.5 billion a year or £850 per head, that's £4.5 billion we could be putting towards a sovereign wealth fund, cutting deficits, fighting austerity or pishing it up against a wall etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The first big blue spike was during the second world war.
The one in the 1992 was the impact of the pound leaving the ERM.
The final one was the aftershock of the financial crash.
I am unaware of a time when Labour had these sorts of challenges to clean up so a direct comparison is impossible.
This is yet another in a tedious line of abuse of statistics.


Is it not the case that the 1992 crisis was down to the failure of the Tory economic policy? The same can't really be said of the 2008 crash.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, pandarilla said:

Is it not the case that the 1992 crisis was down to the failure of the Tory economic policy? The same can't really be said of the 2008 crash.

 

 

Absolutely, 1992 was a failure of Tory domestic economic policy while 2008 was a failure of financial regulation in the US and Europe as much as the UK.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Baxter Parp said:

Jesus Christ. Here, let me help you, as you can see below, historically Tory governments generally run higher deficits than Labour ones and surpluses are, in fact, rare in either case.  Note also that the Labour government was running a very moderate deficit until the financial crisis hit when it ballooned due to shrinking revenues and the vast sums handed to the bankers so that they could maintain liquidity and give themselves bonuses.  Get it yet?

the_historical_budget_shortfall__Fbvifed

Can you actually answer the question you were asked? 

Edited by strichener
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ayrmad said:

Off the top of my head used £1.8t as debt and applied your 0.0573 figure and a rough population share.

Even at 3% it's £4.5 billion a year or £850 per head, that's £4.5 billion we could be putting towards a sovereign wealth fund, cutting deficits, fighting austerity or pishing it up against a wall etc.

According to the Scottish government, the amount is £2.8bln.  Which is roughly the same as what it was in 2007 - £2.6bln.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Baxter Parp said:

Screen-Shot-2016-03-12-at-20.47.59-550x7

Fill yer boots.

Ignoring the fact that you have extended the time period past the Labour administration that was in power at the time that you blame the bankers for everything, comparing Labour to the Conservatives is meaningless.  You stated that Labour did not overspend and anyway you look at it the clearly did:

Debt in 1997: £352bln
Debt in 2007: £527bln

Surplus: -£175bln

I am not sure how badly you failed arithmetic but clearly the Labour government overspent.

Edited by strichener
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe. I prefer to remember the speculators deliberately betting against the pound.
It is hard to imagine anyone being able to deal with that any better than Major's government. I remember 16% interest rates at one point as they desperately tried to prevent devaluation of the currency and hence an exit from the ERM. If I remember rightly, the flaw was in requiring member's currencies to remain within a certain value range. They fixed this using the Euro if my memory serves me correctly. I would say it was a failure of the ERM mechanism rather than the Tories.


I'm out my depth with economics but can many of these problems not be traced back to the city of London's so-called 'big bang' in the late 80s?

Thatcher unleashed the power of the city traders - and my take on it was that it came back to bite them on the arse?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, strichener said:

According to the Scottish government, the amount is £2.8bln.  Which is roughly the same as what it was in 2007 - £2.6bln.

Is there not also approximately 50% of that figure that comes off at source to pay the interest to the treasury on the QE?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, ayrmad said:

Is there not also approximately 50% of that figure that comes off at source to pay the interest to the treasury on the QE?

The last information I had on this was that the BOE QE program paid 0.5% on the money used in the QE program.  The government pays the BOE interest on the gilts that the bank holds and then the remainder is returned to the treasury.  If this is still the case and with the current QE amounts the total net interest on QE would be just over £2bln for the entire QE program.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, strichener said:

The last information I had on this was that the BOE QE program paid 0.5% on the money used in the QE program.  The government pays the BOE interest on the gilts that the bank holds and then the remainder is returned to the treasury.  If this is still the case and with the current QE amounts the total net interest on QE would be just over £2bln for the entire QE program.

I just remember the ludicrous position from a few years ago where Scotland was getting tagged for paying interest on cash the UK borrowed from itself, it was certainly considerably more than a population share of £2b back then, it's not like there's much a wee diddy country like ourselves could do with a piddly £170 million on top of the other paltry £2.6 billion.

You're posting here like these figures are insignificant amounts, the large figure is 3 new QE hospitals in Glasgow, 2 Queensferry crossings, 100 secondary schools, scrapping the bedroom tax 50 times,a 50% increase in pensions,doubling working and child tax credits, building a bridge and doubling DLA & Attendance Allowance  etc etc etc.

Edited by ayrmad
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, ayrmad said:

I just remember the ludicrous position from a few years ago where Scotland was getting tagged for paying interest on cash the UK borrowed from itself, it was certainly considerably more than a population share of £2b back then, it's not like there's much a wee diddy country like ourselves could do with a piddly £170 million on top of the other paltry £2.6 billion.

You're posting here like these figures are insignificant amounts, the large figure is 3 new QE hospitals in Glasgow, 2 Queensferry crossings, 100 secondary schools, scrapping the bedroom tax 50 times,a 50% increase in pensions,doubling working and child tax credits, building a bridge and doubling DLA & Attendance Allowance  etc etc etc.

I have already stated that I agreed with the sentiment.  Using realistic figures doesn't dilute the argument as you have clearly demonstrated by the above post.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, doulikefish said:

Public workers pay cap remains,the tories have just voted down an amendment to lift the freeze

I'm sure all of Theresa's weasel words of thanks to the emergency services over the last couple of months will help them pay their bills...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...