Jump to content

Scotrail


ScottR96

Recommended Posts

11 hours ago, oaksoft said:

And you also have guys at the bottom doing the bare minimum and yet expecting to take home the same pay rise as those who work harder and that is even more common.

Piss taking works both ways.

Leave aside the fairness of things for a second.

Wage levels are set by the market. If lots of companies want your skills and only a handful of people have those skills then you're going to be able to command a higher wage than those who have skills which are either non-existent or ten-a-penny. For example, if I live in a remote area and need roofing work done and only you are available as a roofer in that area then you can charge whatever you like and I have zero choice.

It's why CEOs earn so much for example. A bad CEO can close your company down almost overnight. A good CEO is rarer than hen's teeth. It's a very difficult job to do properly and only a handful of people can do it. It might not seem fair but as I've said before that if it's fairness you are demanding you're going to be seriously disappointed in life.

The last paragraph is nonsense. CEOs are utterly dispensible which is why they are dispensed with so often. Usually as the first course of action in the face of trouble.

Companies can do this as there is a mandarin class of CEOs of FTSE 500 companies and another will be along in minute. 

It's a conceit that everyone at board level is in on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ScotRail said if drivers begin doing overtime again a full timetable could return within 10 days.

Presumably that'll be the proper 2019 style timetable rather than the kiddy-on "full timetable" they were running earlier this year which had significantly less trains than the good old days?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, Marshmallo said:

ScotRail said if drivers begin doing overtime again a full timetable could return within 10 days.

Presumably that'll be the proper 2019 style timetable rather than the kiddy-on "full timetable" they were running earlier this year which had significantly less trains than the good old days?

I would think it reverts to the May 2022 timetable with all the cuts in it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, oaksoft said:

Makes you wonder if all the disruption and the loss of pay by being on strike was worth it given that they could have had 4.2% almost 2 months ago.

For someone on £50k all the disruption has earned them just £33 a month before tax and NI.

Was it really worth it for under £20 a month net or just over a tenner a month net for someone on £20k ?

 

Actual footage of the train drivers being able to afford an extra round a month

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Billy Jean King said:
16 minutes ago, DA Baracus said:
You know fine well it wasn't all about pay (it's been posted numerous times).
Stop playing these silly games.

Yip the headline pay rise is just part of the settlement. They have got themselves a good deal.

Yup. Obviously pay was a significant part of it, but not all of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, oaksoft said:

Makes you wonder if all the disruption and the loss of pay by being on strike was worth it given that they could have had 4.2% almost 2 months ago.

For someone on £50k all the disruption has earned them just £33 a month before tax and NI.

Was it really worth it for under £20 a month net or just over a tenner a month net for someone on £20k ?

Except no one went on strike and the 5% is backdated to April. So is the £195 monthly target bonus.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/07/2022 at 11:11, invergowrie arab said:

The last paragraph is nonsense. CEOs are utterly dispensible which is why they are dispensed with so often. Usually as the first course of action in the face of trouble.

Companies can do this as there is a mandarin class of CEOs of FTSE 500 companies and another will be along in minute. 

It's a conceit that everyone at board level is in on.

Yea, the p&o ferries debacle seems like a good recent example. Politicians get to look tough for the cameras and grill an executive, executive eats the shit and admits they didnt care about legal obligations to consult unions, exec either survives and continues to coin it in or gets a great payoff for falling on their sword and still coins it in. They shrug it off alan partridge style and move on to the next racket. 

Corporate manslaughter is arguably an exception to the """risks""" they take as no-one really wants that on their cv but afaik its pretty rare for anyone to ever get charged with it in the uk.

Edited by Thistle_do_nicely
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5% which they accepted instead of 4.2% which they rejected 2 months ago is a difference of 0.8%
0.8% of £50k is £400 per year or £33 per month.
On £50k all of that increase will be taxed at 40% with NI thrown in.
What did I miss?

Got you. Though if it's a case of just an extra £33 a month it makes you wonder why folk were getting their knickers in such a twist when the 4.2% was knocked back.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...