Jump to content

Scotrail


ScottR96

Recommended Posts

10 hours ago, mac.i said:

The difference and where pedantry rules is that drivers decided to stop doing overtime when the ballot papers were sent out for Industrial Action. In order for it to be legally classed as such the ballot would need to be in favour of action short of a strike (not doing overtime etc) or strike and the company given 7(iirc) days notice.

So technically not industrial action but having the same effect...

You're 100% correct, but as we're not in a court of law with lawyers and all their ridiculous pedantry running the show, we can in fact call a spade a spade here and recognise that is, in fact, a form of industrial action. 

Just because it isn't balloted IA according to the rules does not change that reality. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, virginton said:

You're 100% correct, but as we're not in a court of law with lawyers and all their ridiculous pedantry running the show, we can in fact call a spade a spade here and recognise that is, in fact, a form of industrial action. 

Just because it isn't balloted IA according to the rules does not change that reality. 

As we're not directly involved we might but those who are involved will be making sure they don't say the wrong thing... Also includes the company which I'm sure you'll have noticed as they don't want to antagonise things.

The current timetable is simply because Scotrail didn't know from one day to the next who would/ would not work overtime and which services would be affected.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, mac.i said:

As we're not directly involved we might but those who are involved will be making sure they don't say the wrong thing... Also includes the company which I'm sure you'll have noticed as they don't want to antagonise things.

The current timetable is simply because Scotrail didn't know from one day to the next who would/ would not work overtime and which services would be affected.

If that was their worry they would be best placed refraining from saying anything at all tbh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://www.businessinsider.nl/norways-government-halted-an-oil-and-gas-worker-strike-that-could-have-cut-natural-gas-exports-by-60-and-worsened-europes-energy-crisis/

Turns out that even the cuddly, social democratic Norwegians do not in fact give people an unlimited right to strike action. 

Quote

The Norwegian government has the power to intervene in labor disputes under certain conditions, per Reuters. It has proposed compulsory wage arbitration between the Lederne union and employers.

Which is exactly the same principle that should apply to any essential service industry in the UK (including public transport): compulsory arbitration of disputes by an independent regulator. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 28/06/2022 at 09:54, virginton said:

The world's smallest violin playing, for the but... below inflation!' pay rises experienced by the professions since 2010. 

None of which will be full-time salaried doctors or teachers. 

Okay great - so once we get (at least some of):

• global agreement on tax obligations for MNCs like Amazon;

• the UK destroying its network of grubby tax havens in the Commonwealth;

• the EU similarly closing up Ireland and Luxembourg's rackets;

• and other unnamed 'tax loopholes' are closed up

then we'll be in a position to hand out 20% pay rises to any public sector occupation that merits one. Until that point though, we're not. 

I'm sure that professions like lawyers, doctors and teachers will now recognise that their interests lie in such a radical agenda, and will unite with the lesser plebs to vote for that program for the first time in UK political history. 

A ‘below inflation’ pay rise, 10 years on the trot, isn’t just something to be laughed off, like you seem to be doing there, it’s an extremely deliberate political decision. I don’t know what angle your coming from, but you seem to be implying that wage rises for public sector workers that keep up with inflation would be an issue. The best lie this Govt. has managed to convince the public of, is that the UK is operating on a tight margin between income and expenditure. I’m not advocating for 20% pay rises, but an increase which keeps up with the basic costs of living should be an absolute given in a country as wealthy as the UK. 
 

We could start by having a quick look at our overseas territories, which have become havens for the unimaginably wealthy in order to, completely legally, evade tax. Have a look at how the City of London operates, post Gordon Brown. No one will ever be able to tell me ‘the money isn’t there’ for wage increases in the public sector, because it absolutely is. To have millionaire politicians come out over the last few months trying to demean and shame the working classes for asking for better pay and conditions, especially the rail workers, is worrying to see. To then have other working class people in different sectors parroting the government line is even worse. Divide and conquer at its finest, the poorest arguing amongst each other as the rich get richer, a transfer of wealth in front of our eyes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 02/07/2022 at 12:46, Self-raising Lazarus said:

This wave of strikes is a direct result of 12 years of austerity. People forget the Cameron Osborne "tighten your belt" patter, which was never actually reversed. For all the claims of pay rises fuelling Inflation I'd be interested in a comparison of top 1% pay and median pay over the last 12 years. And for anyone suggesting there shouldn't be strikes as other people are suffering too, how long do workers, especially unionised, put up with deliberate and concerted efforts to drive down their wages and conditions? Get this government and neoliberalism to ****

Between the start of 2021 and the current day, over a quarter of a million people in the UK have became millionaires. In that same period, the richest 1% now has an average wealth of £3.6 million pounds, an increase of 40% from pre-covid data. I wonder where we should aim our anger at? Nurses, teachers, rail workers? Public sector workers who haven’t had a real terms pay increase in over 10 years? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 28/06/2022 at 11:17, oaksoft said:

In your rush to write this whataboutery post, did you even read mine?

At all?

Cos you missed this bit right at the top.

Everyone is asking for enormous pay-rises and company bosses are balls-deep in the troughs themselves. It's a true saying that when rampant greed gets a hold, all intelligence, common-sense and decency flies out the window. And everyone is at it from the top to the bottom.

Fair enough but the rest of your post seemed to be blaming unions for disruption, and 20% pay rises for public sector workers ‘bankrupting the country’. There wouldn’t be a need for unions if workers weren’t constantly being taken for mugs, especially in the public sector. A decade of real terms pay cuts, that has came to a head now that the cost of living is sky rocketing. Full time nurses and teachers needing to rely on welfare to make ends meet, in one of the wealthiest countries on the planet? Does that seem normal to you? We spend over £200 billion a year on a nuclear deterrent, and if we are ever to be involved in a war you can bet we would be able to find billions upon billions to spend on defence. The money is there, it’s just not being directed towards the people who need it most.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The last train home on Tuesday was 19:20 even during the driver dispute it wasn't as early as that. Naturally I didn't check so missed it and had to get a taxi from Inverkeithing. 

Considering the first train in the morning was 7:40 it seems odd not to run trains for at least 12 hours a day so folk who have to graft for a living can actually get too and from work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, IrishBhoy said:

Fair enough but the rest of your post seemed to be blaming unions for disruption, and 20% pay rises for public sector workers ‘bankrupting the country’. There wouldn’t be a need for unions if workers weren’t constantly being taken for mugs, especially in the public sector. A decade of real terms pay cuts, that has came to a head now that the cost of living is sky rocketing. Full time nurses and teachers needing to rely on welfare to make ends meet, in one of the wealthiest countries on the planet? Does that seem normal to you? We spend over £200 billion a year on a nuclear deterrent, and if we are ever to be involved in a war you can bet we would be able to find billions upon billions to spend on defence. The money is there, it’s just not being directed towards the people who need it most.

No we don’t.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Left Back said:

No we don’t.

Apologies I’ve misread the figures, that is the projected amount that will be spent maintaining Trident and replacing it. It’s still eye watering sums being spent on that and other projects, and it was only a few weeks ago that Johnson said he wanted to be spending £190 billion on defence by the year 2025. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 101 said:

The last train home on Tuesday was 19:20 even during the driver dispute it wasn't as early as that. Naturally I didn't check so missed it and had to get a taxi from Inverkeithing. 

Considering the first train in the morning was 7:40 it seems odd not to run trains for at least 12 hours a day so folk who have to graft for a living can actually get too and from work.

Graft?

How is life at the coal face these days?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Sergeant Wilson said:

Graft?

How is life at the coal face these days?

I don't graft Sarge, I was more concerned about folk who actually contribute something to society.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Sergeant Wilson said:

Fair enough. I'm  sure you'll contribute...eventually.

Have you had a stroke? Or is your sentence structure usually this poor?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, IrishBhoy said:

A ‘below inflation’ pay rise, 10 years on the trot, isn’t just something to be laughed off, like you seem to be doing there, it’s an extremely deliberate political decision. I don’t know what angle your coming from, but you seem to be implying that wage rises for public sector workers that keep up with inflation would be an issue. The best lie this Govt. has managed to convince the public of, is that the UK is operating on a tight margin between income and expenditure. I’m not advocating for 20% pay rises, but an increase which keeps up with the basic costs of living should be an absolute given in a country as wealthy as the UK. 
 

We could start by having a quick look at our overseas territories, which have become havens for the unimaginably wealthy in order to, completely legally, evade tax. Have a look at how the City of London operates, post Gordon Brown. No one will ever be able to tell me ‘the money isn’t there’ for wage increases in the public sector, because it absolutely is. To have millionaire politicians come out over the last few months trying to demean and shame the working classes for asking for better pay and conditions, especially the rail workers, is worrying to see. To then have other working class people in different sectors parroting the government line is even worse. Divide and conquer at its finest, the poorest arguing amongst each other as the rich get richer, a transfer of wealth in front of our eyes.

I already set out a list of changes that would be needed to pay for inflation-matching public sector rises in the post that you quoted, but presumably didn't read for the sake of comprehension. But those reforms need to be carried out first before pay increases can actually be afforded.

And as the ranks of middle class professionals have not once voiced support for anything like that radical economic program, their sectional mewling about pay now can be filed in the bin where it belongs. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

£46.70 is the cheapest single from Glasgow to Aberdeen today. (Open return is £65.20)
I appreciate that there has to be a deterrent for people traveling to Aberdeen but that’s a bit steep. I didn’t want to go anyway, but now I really don’t want to go. 
Why can I get a flight to Belgium for less than a tenner but it’s nearly a full weeks giro to get to Aberdeen and back? I thought this was a wee country that people cycle round on a regular basis. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites



We spend over £200 billion a year on a nuclear deterrent, and if we are ever to be involved in a war you can bet we would be able to find billions upon billions to spend on defence. The money is there, it’s just not being directed towards the people who need it most.


C'mon atleast keep it topical £92 billion on a high speed railway that 99.9% of the country have absolutely no use for
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, oaksoft said:

You could have simply asked instead of assuming.

It seems fashionable on here to screech at posters first and then ask questions later.

That's why we can't have genuinely interesting conversations about anything.

Away you go. That's what makes it interesting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, oaksoft said:

You could have simply asked instead of assuming.

It seems fashionable on here to screech at posters first and then ask questions later.

That's why we can't have genuinely interesting conversations about anything.

It’s a Scottish football forum, not the Oxford Union debating chamber. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...