Detournement Posted February 25, 2021 Share Posted February 25, 2021 (edited) 9 minutes ago, Boo Khaki said: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-edinburgh-east-fife-56170459 Idiot jailed for tweeting the names of complainers, twice. He should just have told folk to read the Dani Gravelli article. Edited February 25, 2021 by Detournement 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ira Gaines Posted February 25, 2021 Share Posted February 25, 2021 HB 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Benjamin_Nevis Posted February 25, 2021 Share Posted February 25, 2021 11 minutes ago, Detournement said: Again things aren't are contarian just because you disagree with them. And if you could stop engaging with me I'd be fucking delighted. OK OK I'll just stick to laughing at you. Sheesh. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baxter Parp Posted February 25, 2021 Share Posted February 25, 2021 http://www.advocates.org.uk/news-and-responses/news/2021/feb/importance-of-maintaining-confidence-in-judicial-system-and-rule-of-lawImportance of maintaining confidence in judicial system and rule of lawFrom the Faculty of Advocates. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Detournement Posted February 25, 2021 Share Posted February 25, 2021 "No one in public life is beyond reproach" Surely the suppression of Salmond's evidence proves otherwise? Woman A and Woman H appear to be beyond reproach. -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baxter Parp Posted February 25, 2021 Share Posted February 25, 2021 "You knew what you were doing and you deliberately chose to flout the court order," the judge said."Man jailed for tweeting names of Alex Salmond accusers - BBC News" https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/amp/uk-scotland-edinburgh-east-fife-56170459Just in case anyone was vague on what a court order is. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Ghost of B A R P Posted February 25, 2021 Share Posted February 25, 2021 5 hours ago, Genuine Hibs Fan said: You can just say misogynist if you like. But unfortunately I think you're making the mistake of thinking TERFs = women. If I didn't want to be labelled a TERF I would simply not be a radical feminist excluding trans people tbh. I'm sure there's a hard hitting WoS article about woke Nazis and women hating trans people for you to paraphrase though! I do say misogynist... because you’re a misogynist, plain and simple. And a hypocrite. And an idiot, judging by the ‘I think you’re making the mistake’, while having absolutely no idea what you’re talking about. But it’s OK, P&B will quickly turn it into an argument about fuckin sectarianism... -2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AMMjag Posted February 25, 2021 Share Posted February 25, 2021 The repeat assertion that women with serious complaints are 'at the centre' of this (whilst correct), is particularly grating coming from Sturgeon. Whatever your views on Salmond, it was hardly him or his legal team that 1.) Leaked the story to the Daily Record, without the collective permission of the complainers 2.) Sent the case onto the Crown Office (then requiring it to be passed onto the Police), without the collective permission of the complainers. 3.) Recalled and redacted submissions to the Committee, in a way that inadvertently, and effectively, draws attention to who the complainers are. We already know from the outcome of the Judicial Review that there has been, at best, gross incompetence in the handling of complaints, but when you see language from the Chief Executive of the Party as well as the Civil Service like 'losing battles but winning wars' or being out to 'get him', it's not unreasonable to be concerned that this could escalate into something far more serious that implicates the FM, should the Committee see all of the relevant information (as it should). Sturgeon's political acumen and bridge-building in Europe (not to mention current polling numbers) are undoubtedly an asset to Independence. But you simply cannot go into an election - let alone a potential campaign for Independence - with this threatening to bomb in her face at any given moment, because with the amount of people determined to not care about this or make it out as a 'non-issue', the bulk of the movement bombs with her. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Ghost of B A R P Posted February 25, 2021 Share Posted February 25, 2021 1 hour ago, MONKMAN said: Absolute NAP that Ghost of BARP moron will go silent in the next 48 hours. ‘Nap’... ‘moron’... You could do us all a favour and go silent for the next 48 months. Actually, nobody would notice, because, like the rest of the mouth-breathing clowns desperately clinging onto ‘nothing to see here’, you have absolutely f**k all to say. Nap. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Benjamin_Nevis Posted February 25, 2021 Share Posted February 25, 2021 7 minutes ago, The Ghost of B A R P said: I do say misogynist... because you’re a misogynist, plain and simple. And a hypocrite. And an idiot, judging by the ‘I think you’re making the mistake’, while having absolutely no idea what you’re talking about. But it’s OK, P&B will quickly turn it into an argument about fuckin sectarianism... 4 minutes ago, The Ghost of B A R P said: ‘Nap’... ‘moron’... You could do us all a favour and go silent for the next 48 months. Actually, nobody would notice, because, like the rest of the mouth-breathing clowns desperately clinging onto ‘nothing to see here’, you have absolutely f**k all to say. Nap. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Ghost of B A R P Posted February 25, 2021 Share Posted February 25, 2021 4 hours ago, Day of the Lords said: Most of us just find your relentless contrarian, and made-up attention-seeking shite a mixture of a bit sad and a bit funny. The only upset people are absolute nutters like yourself who seem to be annoyed that posters who aren't mental can't be fucked engaging with your conspiratorial pish. HTH. Give it up, clown. Hundreds of posts saying ‘I don’t gie a f**k’, ‘naebody kin be bothered engaging wi yer shite’. You’re a simpleton who has no idea what people are talking about. Just don’t post. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Ghost of B A R P Posted February 25, 2021 Share Posted February 25, 2021 Just now, Day of the Lords said: Your timing’s amazing, though... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Bob Mahelp Posted February 25, 2021 Share Posted February 25, 2021 1 minute ago, AMMjag said: Sturgeon's political acumen and bridge-building in Europe (not to mention current polling numbers) are undoubtedly an asset to Independence. But you simply cannot go into an election - let alone a potential campaign for Independence - with this threatening to bomb in her face at any given moment, because with the amount of people determined to not care about this or make it out as a 'non-issue', the bulk of the movement bombs with her. I don't think it's a non-issue if there is proof beyond doubt that the FM has broken the ministerial code and/or conspired in someway to try and get Salmond jailed. If that were the case, she would have to resign and the SNP would have to face the consequences in May. But....there are many dynamics in play here which mean it's not just a simple 'guilty/not guilty' issue. Salmond's ego and thirst for revenge being one, opposition politicians having already judged and sentenced her being another, and the inherent division in Scottish politics which means that 50% of people support the SNP and 50% hate the SNP. Until everyone has a chance to be questioned and present their case, I don't see how anyone can truly work out who is right and who is wrong. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Genuine Hibs Fan Posted February 25, 2021 Share Posted February 25, 2021 11 minutes ago, The Ghost of B A R P said: I do say misogynist... because you’re a misogynist, plain and simple. And a hypocrite. And an idiot, judging by the ‘I think you’re making the mistake’, while having absolutely no idea what you’re talking about. But it’s OK, P&B will quickly turn it into an argument about fuckin sectarianism... Go on then, tell me how referring to people as TERFs is misogynist language 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Ghost of B A R P Posted February 25, 2021 Share Posted February 25, 2021 Just now, Bob Mahelp said: I don't think it's a non-issue if there is proof beyond doubt that the FM has broken the ministerial code and/or conspired in someway to try and get Salmond jailed. If that were the case, she would have to resign and the SNP would have to face the consequences in May. But....there are many dynamics in play here which mean it's not just a simple 'guilty/not guilty' issue. Salmond's ego and thirst for revenge being one, opposition politicians having already judged and sentenced her being another, and the inherent division in Scottish politics which means that 50% of people support the SNP and 50% hate the SNP. Until everyone has a chance to be questioned and present their case, I don't see how anyone can truly work out who is right and who is wrong. Stop with this utter pish, will you? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Benjamin_Nevis Posted February 25, 2021 Share Posted February 25, 2021 4 minutes ago, The Ghost of B A R P said: Give it up, clown. Hundreds of posts saying ‘I don’t gie a f**k’, ‘naebody kin be bothered engaging wi yer shite’. You’re a simpleton who has no idea what people are talking about. Just don’t post. Calm down there Mr Angry 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Ghost of B A R P Posted February 25, 2021 Share Posted February 25, 2021 Just now, Genuine Hibs Fan said: Go on then, tell me how referring to people as TERFs is misogynist language I’ll take that as confirmation that you’re gradually realising the error of your ways. Well done. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Ghost of B A R P Posted February 25, 2021 Share Posted February 25, 2021 Just now, Day of the Lords said: Calm down there Mr Angry That’s a bingo... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Genuine Hibs Fan Posted February 25, 2021 Share Posted February 25, 2021 1 minute ago, The Ghost of B A R P said: I’ll take that as confirmation that you’re gradually realising the error of your ways. Well done. Not at all, just asking you to back up your assertions bud! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SandyCromarty Posted February 25, 2021 Share Posted February 25, 2021 8 minutes ago, AMMjag said: The repeat assertion that women with serious complaints are 'at the centre' of this (whilst correct), is particularly grating coming from Sturgeon. Whatever your views on Salmond, it was hardly him or his legal team that 1.) Leaked the story to the Daily Record, without the collective permission of the complainers 2.) Sent the case onto the Crown Office (then requiring it to be passed onto the Police), without the collective permission of the complainers. 3.) Recalled and redacted submissions to the Committee, in a way that inadvertently, and effectively, draws attention to who the complainers are. We already know from the outcome of the Judicial Review that there has been, at best, gross incompetence in the handling of complaints, but when you see language from the Chief Executive of the Party as well as the Civil Service like 'losing battles but winning wars' or being out to 'get him', it's not unreasonable to be concerned that this could escalate into something far more serious that implicates the FM, should the Committee see all of the relevant information (as it should). Sturgeon's political acumen and bridge-building in Europe (not to mention current polling numbers) are undoubtedly an asset to Independence. But you simply cannot go into an election - let alone a potential campaign for Independence - with this threatening to bomb in her face at any given moment, because with the amount of people determined to not care about this or make it out as a 'non-issue', the bulk of the movement bombs with her. You may recall Alex Salmond's lawyer, Gordon Jackson, during the course of the trial, being caught on camera in a train carriage loudly discussing the trial, in the video, which was obtained by the Sunday Times, he seems to name two of the accusers despite court orders not to do so. He later resigned his position as Dean of the Faculty of Advocates. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.