F_T_Y Posted December 2, 2015 Share Posted December 2, 2015 A group created by reckless military action in iraq and libya. History repeating itself. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jagfox Posted December 2, 2015 Share Posted December 2, 2015 BE A WEAR!!!! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Antlion Posted December 2, 2015 Share Posted December 2, 2015 Cameron is interested in showcasing Raytheon bombs which will raise their share price, he then gets funded by them and the Tories have a war chest for the next election. It is how the business works. This. Whip the proles up into militaristic fervour and jingoistic aggression about the necessary defence of the realm and bim bam boom, job done. Note also how many Labour MPs were invited to the Raytheon gala dinner at the start of the year. Now let's see how many of those names suddenly feel a huge pang of conscience and the need to conscientiously drop bombs because Paris, terror, threat, defence. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doulikefish Posted December 2, 2015 Share Posted December 2, 2015 Not just Tory MP's You could see the SNP MP's hopping up and down on their benches protesting about the unfairness of them previously being rebuked for clapping. If it makes you happy,im chuffed for you 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carl Cort's Hamstring Posted December 2, 2015 Share Posted December 2, 2015 A group created by reckless military action in iraq and libya. History repeating itself. They existed before that. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevthedee Posted December 2, 2015 Share Posted December 2, 2015 Class. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
F_T_Y Posted December 2, 2015 Share Posted December 2, 2015 Barry Ferguson-esque. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baxter Parp Posted December 2, 2015 Share Posted December 2, 2015 Context is everything. The full quote is: How will bombing a different faction have a different result? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DA Baracus Posted December 2, 2015 Share Posted December 2, 2015 I assume the UK will soon be bombing America due to all the murders that place over there such as the most recent one? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baxter Parp Posted December 2, 2015 Share Posted December 2, 2015 I assume the UK will soon be bombing America due to all the murders that place over there such as the most recent one? Nah, America's terrorists are white. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Bairn Posted December 2, 2015 Share Posted December 2, 2015 What exactly is the point in this "amendment" they're voting on right now? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zetterlund Posted December 2, 2015 Share Posted December 2, 2015 Proof? The US and UK etc have wanted Assad gone for years, along with a list of other non-cooperative governments. A former French foreign minister also said he was informed of British plans to back an insurgency in Syria years before any violence. ISIS could be dealt with without dropping more bombs but no-one is interested in any alternative approach. Regime change is priority number one. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D.A.F.C Posted December 2, 2015 Share Posted December 2, 2015 If Assad is a butcher then we must've been mad for sausages a few years back when we invited him to Downing Street. What a bunch of c***s. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Bairn Posted December 2, 2015 Share Posted December 2, 2015 The US and UK etc have wanted Assad gone for years, along with a list of other non-cooperative governments. A former French foreign minister also said he was informed of British plans to back an insurgency in Syria years before any violence. ISIS could be dealt with without dropping more bombs but no-one is interested in any alternative approach. Regime change is priority number one. I'm not denying that the UK want Assad gone but that doesn't mean supporting ISIS either. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Master Posted December 2, 2015 Share Posted December 2, 2015 How will bombing a different faction have a different result? You think IS are part of the larger Syrian rebellion? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Bairn Posted December 2, 2015 Share Posted December 2, 2015 390-211. Pleasing. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kejan Posted December 2, 2015 Share Posted December 2, 2015 Just listening to this bollox. f**k me, shout AYEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE Shout NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO WTF. 2015. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
P45 Posted December 2, 2015 Share Posted December 2, 2015 Democracy bitches! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baxter Parp Posted December 2, 2015 Share Posted December 2, 2015 You think IS are part of the larger Syrian rebellion? I think they're a faction in a war of many factions. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tintax Posted December 2, 2015 Share Posted December 2, 2015 ???? state of them all. Did the speaker just shout there "division clear the chamber" the f**k is all that about 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.