Jump to content

Hollywood star HIV +


Broony88

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 153
  • Created
  • Last Reply

It is if you are living a life obsessed with Celebrities.

Should he not be allowed privacy rather than forced to announce a medical condition before a tabloid (for the brain dead) did ?

Regardless of how much of a twat he has been.

*If* he's been knowingly infecting other folk though, then it's probably a good thing to have it in the news. It's all well and good saying that everyone should be using protection anyway, but a disturbing number of folk don't (I'm looking at you, P&B). His card's been well and truly marked now, *if* that's the case.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From what I've...been told of....yes...not seen..... of Miss Olsons oeuvre you could have a cock like Popeye's forearm and still not hit the sides.

Few hundred quid and you can probably find out for yourself; the debate about the difference between porn performers and prostitutes seems to be over these days. Presumably Charlie got a bulk discount.

Probably thought she already had it, due to her "day" job.

Porn performers are cleaner than the average citizen due to the number of checks they have to get. Contract an STD and you get blackballed.

Stop tittering at the back, there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wasn't being entirely serious.

I know, love. None of us were.

It's just a fact that seems to take some folk by surprise. Especially when I bring it up in the queue at the supermarket.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know, love. None of us were.

It's just a fact that seems to take some folk by surprise. Especially when I bring it up in the queue at the supermarket.

And do you also mention the fact?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...