John Lambies Doos Posted September 23, 2015 Share Posted September 23, 2015 You talk about democracy while demanding another vote on something because you lost. Democracy spoke, it's a No. Oh thundercats, you are indeed missing the point. Proud Scot you are not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fide Posted September 23, 2015 Author Share Posted September 23, 2015 Moonglum25, it would be just peachy if you'd stiop being a silent shiter and have the courage to post your views. You're the most craven of the deferential No's. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mjw Posted September 23, 2015 Share Posted September 23, 2015 Moonglum25, it would be just peachy if you'd stiop being a silent shiter and have the courage to post your views. You're the most craven of the deferential No's. What if you stop giving him the only attention he gets on here? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fide Posted September 23, 2015 Author Share Posted September 23, 2015 What if you stop giving him the only attention he gets on here? I don't believe he's seeking attention. Quite the opposite. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevthedee Posted September 23, 2015 Share Posted September 23, 2015 You believe that your own country is unique in its inability to manage its own affairs. You remain silent while the people of Scotland are mocked, lied to, sidelined, treated with contempt and ripped off financially, but get 'angry' when you're told to by the mainstream media. You no doubt 'hate' Alex Salmond for being fat, while remaining silent about paedophile cover ups, illegal wars, expense scandals, poverty, and legislation causing misery to thousands. You are a typical Britnat. But keep telling yourself you're a proud Scot Lots of assumptions about what a no vote stands for in your post,all rather sad and ignorant and what i now come to expect from bitter yes voters who cant accept democracy and like to blame no voters for everything that happens very childish. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fide Posted September 23, 2015 Author Share Posted September 23, 2015 Lots of assumptions about what a no vote stands for in your post,all rather sad and ignorant and what i now come to expect from bitter yes voters who cant accept democracy and like to blame no voters for everything that happens very childish. Ok Kev, benefit of the doubt time. Other than arch-Unionists or those who believe that only Scotland alone is too much of a feeble basket case to go it alone, what other reason was there for voting No? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevthedee Posted September 23, 2015 Share Posted September 23, 2015 Ok Kev, benefit of the doubt time. Other than arch-Unionists or those who believe that only Scotland alone is too much of a feeble basket case to go it alone, what other reason was there for voting No? For many no voters it was fear of change,there was to much uncertanty in peoples minds about currancy,jobs,eu,nato etc Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Lambies Doos Posted September 23, 2015 Share Posted September 23, 2015 Ok Kev, benefit of the doubt time. Other than arch-Unionists or those who believe that only Scotland alone is too much of a feeble basket case to go it alone, what other reason was there for voting No? For many no voters it was fear of change,there was to much uncertanty in peoples minds about currancy,jobs,eu,nato etc That's why your are a shitebag Kev, like we have being saying. Scotland would have been such a success.. but weak minded servile like u held it back. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
renton Posted September 23, 2015 Share Posted September 23, 2015 Ok Kev, benefit of the doubt time. Other than arch-Unionists or those who believe that only Scotland alone is too much of a feeble basket case to go it alone, what other reason was there for voting No? For many no voters it was fear of change,there was to much uncertanty in peoples minds about currancy,jobs,eu,nato etc I don't want to speak for Fide, but I think that comes under the "feeble basket case" column. There was only ever as much uncertainty as you wanted to find. Any impartial analysis of the case offered by both sides would conclude that there was plenty of uncertainty on both sides, we are after all, committed to an in/out referendum on the EU, which doesn't look presently like a foregone conclusion. It's also the case that many of the public spending cut backs that BT told us would be inevitable after a Yes vote have come to pass any way. We would have had the Pound Sterling after a yes vote, even if it was 'panama' style, what we chose to use in the long term would have been in our hands. Anyone who thinks we wouldn't have been in NATO, or better yet, anyone who thinks it would've made any kind of a difference if we were or weren't is clearly scraping the barrel. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fide Posted September 23, 2015 Author Share Posted September 23, 2015 Ok Kev, benefit of the doubt time. Other than arch-Unionists or those who believe that only Scotland alone is too much of a feeble basket case to go it alone, what other reason was there for voting No? For many no voters it was fear of change,there was to much uncertanty in peoples minds about currancy,jobs,eu,nato etc Ok, so you went for option B - Scotland is, uniquely in the world, unable to go it alone as an independent country. Any uncertainty was fabricated by Project Fear and embraced and jumped on by eager No voters desperate not to be seen as servile desperados. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Lambies Doos Posted September 23, 2015 Share Posted September 23, 2015 Ok, so you went for option B - Scotland is, uniquely in the world, unable to go it alone as an independent country. Any uncertainty was fabricated by Project Fear and embraced and jumped on by eager No voters desperate not to be seen as servile desperados. There really was no rationale for a proud Scot to vote No. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
strichener Posted September 23, 2015 Share Posted September 23, 2015 Lots of assumptions about what a no vote stands for in your post,all rather sad and ignorant and what i now come to expect from bitter yes voters who cant accept democracy and like to blame no voters for everything that happens very childish. Complete lack of understanding of what democracy means. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fide Posted September 23, 2015 Author Share Posted September 23, 2015 There really was no rationale for a proud Scot to vote No. It's really very simple when you think about it. If you ARE a proud Scot, and an honest proud Scot, you voted Yes. There is no way you can equate "Proud Scot" with "No voter". It isn't possible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Lambies Doos Posted September 23, 2015 Share Posted September 23, 2015 It's really very simple when you think about it. If you ARE a proud Scot, and an honest proud Scot, you voted Yes. There is no way you can equate "Proud Scot" with "No voter". It isn't possible. It's an oxymoron Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
welshbairn Posted September 23, 2015 Share Posted September 23, 2015 There really was no rationale for a proud Scot to vote No. It's really very simple when you think about it. If you ARE a proud Scot, and an honest proud Scot, you voted Yes. There is no way you can equate "Proud Scot" with "No voter". It isn't possible. It's an oxymoron Get a room, you two. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Lambies Doos Posted September 23, 2015 Share Posted September 23, 2015 Get a room, you two. Why? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
welshbairn Posted September 23, 2015 Share Posted September 23, 2015 Why? So you can spare the rest of us Yes voters this embarrassing "true patriotic Scotsman" drivel. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Lambies Doos Posted September 23, 2015 Share Posted September 23, 2015 So you can spare the rest of us Yes voters this embarrassing "true patriotic Scotsman" drivel. So should we invite the other 1.4 million and rising Scots to this room. Perhaps it's you that should get 'said' room, perhaps with breakfast Inc. That way you can wake up and smell the coffee! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fide Posted September 23, 2015 Author Share Posted September 23, 2015 So you can spare the rest of us Yes voters this embarrassing "true patriotic Scotsman" drivel. I'm delighted you're the appointed spokesperson of the Yes movement. Congrats. Was it a tough interview process? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
welshbairn Posted September 23, 2015 Share Posted September 23, 2015 I'm delighted you're the appointed spokesperson of the Yes movement. Congrats. Was it a tough interview process? No, it was a doddle. I just had to show I didn't think I was a tartan Joe McCarthy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.