strichener Posted September 1, 2015 Share Posted September 1, 2015 The big question is whether Sevco submitted documents containing false information to the SFA and SFL when it applied for membership and entry respectively? Whilst it may be a question, the answer does not matter. The SFA and SPFL will not do anything about it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sergeant Wilson Posted September 1, 2015 Share Posted September 1, 2015 The big question is whether Sevco submitted documents containing false information to the SFA and SFL when it applied for membership and entry respectively? They could've handed in an opal fruit paper and the football authorities would have accepted it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted September 1, 2015 Share Posted September 1, 2015 Normans making himself look like even more of a tit tonight. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bishop Briggs Posted September 1, 2015 Share Posted September 1, 2015 Whilst it may be a question, the answer does not matter. The SFA and SPFL will not do anything about it. There could be pressure from the media and, more importantly, UEFA or FIFA. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted September 1, 2015 Share Posted September 1, 2015 Whilst it may be a question, the answer does not matter. The SFA and SPFL will not do anything about it. Have we ever found out why the SPL hastily changed to the spfl? It all seemed rather rushed and desperate at the time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sergeant Wilson Posted September 1, 2015 Share Posted September 1, 2015 There could be pressure from the media and, more importantly, UEFA or FIFA. The media? It was them that was bleating to get the c***s back in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted September 1, 2015 Share Posted September 1, 2015 The police don't get involved in civic matters. 'Civic matters' is at the very heart of policing. This is why we have them. I guess you are confused here (no surprise) and actually meant 'civil disputes'. Still it's great to ken that someone with your insight and understanding is jizzing his wisdom all over Rangers-related thread. Again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted September 1, 2015 Share Posted September 1, 2015 The media? It was them that was bleating to get the c***s back in. Back that would imply the same club. Did you not get the never say back memo? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sergeant Wilson Posted September 1, 2015 Share Posted September 1, 2015 Have we ever found out why the SPL hastily changed to the spfl? It all seemed rather rushed and desperate at the time. Opportunism and "empire" building. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bishop Briggs Posted September 1, 2015 Share Posted September 1, 2015 The media? It was them that was bleating to get the c***s back in. Back? It was an application by a new company that had bought Deadco's assets for a fraction of their true value. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted September 1, 2015 Share Posted September 1, 2015 Whyte and whitehouse arrested twice Green, withey, Clark and Grier once How long until stocky and imran Ahmed are lifted? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sergeant Wilson Posted September 1, 2015 Share Posted September 1, 2015 Back? It was an application by a new company that had bought Deadco's assets for a fraction of their true value. The point was the media supported the charge for in statement straight to the SPL. When public pressure scuppered that SFL hierarchy were supported by the same journalists to get them in to the 1st division. They are also chief purveyors of the same club myth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted September 1, 2015 Share Posted September 1, 2015 The point was the media supported the charge for in statement straight to the SPL. When public pressure scuppered that SFL hierarchy were supported by the same journalists to get them in to the 1st division. They are also chief purveyors of the same club myth. Seriously the media I read and heard must be different to yours. Rangers were guilty of financial doping, tax evasion to the tune of hundreds of millions, depriving hospitals of money and all on the word of a discredited blogger. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sergeant Wilson Posted September 1, 2015 Share Posted September 1, 2015 Seriously the media I read and heard must be different to yours.Rangers were guilty of financial doping, tax evasion to the tune of hundreds of millions, depriving hospitals of money and all on the word of a discredited blogger.And where did the likes of Traynor, Jackson etc want them placed? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doulikefish Posted September 1, 2015 Share Posted September 1, 2015 I blame the sfa and the snp for these people are the angels that kept the big hoose open Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sergeant Wilson Posted September 1, 2015 Share Posted September 1, 2015 Back that would imply the same club. Did you not get the never say back memo? It's an expression, don't read too much in to it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sergeant Wilson Posted September 1, 2015 Share Posted September 1, 2015 Seriously the media I read and heard must be different to yours. Rangers were guilty of financial doping, tax evasion to the tune of hundreds of millions, depriving hospitals of money and all on the word of a discredited blogger. Because it wasn't technically illegal, just morally bankrupt, doesn't mean contributions to the revenue weren't avoided. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted September 1, 2015 Share Posted September 1, 2015 And where did the likes of Traynor, Jackson etc want them placed? So what you meant to say was that in your opinion a small portion of the media wanted them in the SPL? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted September 1, 2015 Share Posted September 1, 2015 Because it wasn't technically illegal, just morally bankrupt, doesn't mean contributions to the revenue weren't avoided. It wasn't illegal, end of. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sergeant Wilson Posted September 1, 2015 Share Posted September 1, 2015 So what you meant to say was that in your opinion a small portion of the media wanted them in the SPL?No, they were the more prominent members of the msm and we're fairly representative of the general tone. Leckie paid lip service to the public with his opposition via his man of the people act. While his colleague King leaned the other way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.