Jump to content

The Terrible Journalism & Tom English Thread


Recommended Posts

43 minutes ago, TheScarf said:

Where else are you shooting at? Every shot is 'on goal'.

It's not a shot on goal if it goes wide. Then it's a shot at goal that goes wide. Considering "on" is usually followed in this context with "target" - and considering some of the other nitpicks that get posted in here - I'm surprised this one's being pulled up. It seemed obviously awkwardly written as soon as I saw it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Miguel Sanchez said:

It's not a shot on goal if it goes wide. Then it's a shot at goal that goes wide. Considering "on" is usually followed in this context with "target" - and considering some of the other nitpicks that get posted in here - I'm surprised this one's being pulled up. It seemed obviously awkwardly written as soon as I saw it.

FFS, of course it is. A shot on goal is just a synonym for a shot at goal.

 

More interestingly, I'm disgusted that a shot on target can only be counted as such if it's blocked by either the keeper or the last defender. What a totally shite distinction to make.

3 yards out, a couple of defenders on the line and the goalie stranded. Striker blasts it off one of the defenders' knees and away. Doesn't count as a shot on target. That's insanity! 😄

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Ranaldo Bairn said:

FFS, of course it is. A shot on goal is just a synonym for a shot at goal.

 

More interestingly, I'm disgusted that a shot on target can only be counted as such if it's blocked by either the keeper or the last defender. What a totally shite distinction to make.

3 yards out, a couple of defenders on the line and the goalie stranded. Striker blasts it off one of the defenders' knees and away. Doesn't count as a shot on target. That's insanity! 😄

Yip, that's the bit that struck me.

A shot that would have gone in if not blocked is surely on target, whether stopped by someone wearing gloves or otherwise.

Does a shot blocked by a defender get recorded as a shot at all then?  Suggesting it was off target seems daft, but so does pretending it didn't happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

FFS, of course it is. A shot on goal is just a synonym for a shot at goal.
 
More interestingly, I'm disgusted that a shot on target can only be counted as such if it's blocked by either the keeper or the last defender. What a totally shite distinction to make.
3 yards out, a couple of defenders on the line and the goalie stranded. Striker blasts it off one of the defenders' knees and away. Doesn't count as a shot on target. That's insanity! [emoji1]
If a shot looks like it's going wide but the goalkeeper makes a save, does that get counted as a shot off target?
Opta have a separate category for blocked shots I think.
The main broadcasters and websites don't tend to include blocked shots in their match stats so I usually just assume that any shot that isn't on target must be off target.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know it's probably been like this for a while, but BBC just not giving a f**k about anything lower than our top flight so you can't see stats/line-ups for the Championship games and below is piss poor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Dunning1874 said:

I've always disliked the term 'shots on goal' anyway: everyone knows what a shot is, 'on goal' is entirely superfluous.  Just call them shots.

I think the term was originally introduced to distinguish between the occasions when John Rankin blootered the ball in the vicinity of the goal frame, and those when he blootered it towards the stand at the end his team were attacking

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 20/08/2021 at 16:00, Dons_1988 said:

This has forever been the terminology. 

If I was to go off on a statistical based complaint tangent, it’s always bothered me that hitting the post counts as on target. 

I go all 'Celtic da' when a commentator says "just about crosses the line" when the ball crosses the line.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Ludo*1 said:

I know it's probably been like this for a while, but BBC just not giving a f**k about anything lower than our top flight so you can't see stats/line-ups for the Championship games and below is piss poor.

You sure?

I was looking at the Cove team to see if my pal was playing and managed to see he was on the bench.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Merkland Red said:

You sure?

I was looking at the Cove team to see if my pal was playing and managed to see he was on the bench.

It wasn't earlier. Having checked now, only Stenny vs Cowdenbeath is 'unclickable'.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, Ludo*1 said:

It wasn't earlier. Having checked now, only Stenny vs Cowdenbeath is 'unclickable'.

That is extremely annoying. 

At least they list missed penalties at the top now, along with the nonsense that is "assists".

If a game is ever unclickable like that then the SPFL page is normally fine and has all the info.

Edited by Ranaldo Bairn
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...