Dons_1988 Posted March 31, 2021 Share Posted March 31, 2021 16 minutes ago, accies1874 said: Isn't this completely inaccurate? On the BBC's goalscorers v Faroe Islands quiz (got 15/15 btw). Depends on definition here - I think he was top SPL goalscorer. Not sure if that is also top flight as well. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
craigkillie Posted March 31, 2021 Share Posted March 31, 2021 He's definitely not the Scottish Premiership top goalscorer. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DA Baracus Posted March 31, 2021 Share Posted March 31, 2021 It refers to the SPL only. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ewan14 Posted April 1, 2021 Share Posted April 1, 2021 On 26/03/2021 at 15:38, SouthLanarkshireWhite said: He is a disgusting, horrible individual. Quite why the PC inspired Sky Sports department continue to hire him is beyond me when he admits to deliberately trying to injure an opponent (and succeeding). Seconded ! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GNU_Linux Posted April 2, 2021 Share Posted April 2, 2021 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ron Aldo Posted April 2, 2021 Share Posted April 2, 2021 Is it because someone else won it? 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RandomGuy. Posted April 3, 2021 Share Posted April 3, 2021 8 hours ago, Ron Aldo said: Is it because someone else won it? Tbf that's literally what the article is, just a list of teams who've knocked them out. Incredible someone gets real money to write these things. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dons_1988 Posted April 3, 2021 Share Posted April 3, 2021 An unprovoked attack from bbc tbh. Hopefully we ban them from pittodrie. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TonyFerrino Posted April 3, 2021 Share Posted April 3, 2021 12 hours ago, GNU_Linux said: "Outstanding Journalism (excluding Tom English)" thread for reporting of this calibre. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jacksgranda Posted April 3, 2021 Share Posted April 3, 2021 (edited) 15 hours ago, GNU_Linux said: Little wonder he's holding his head - must have achieved an O Grade at English, which is more than the tweeter obviously did. Edited April 3, 2021 by Jacksgranda Sleppnig 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tamthebam Posted April 3, 2021 Share Posted April 3, 2021 My turn "WHY HAVE DUNDEE NOT WON THE CUP FOR 111 YEARS? Bad luck, bad management on and off the pitch and they've mostly at best been mediocre since the 60s" £500 quid please. Ta. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drew Brees Posted April 3, 2021 Share Posted April 3, 2021 Kris Boyd in today’s Sun, talking about John Kennedy. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KingRocketman II Posted April 3, 2021 Share Posted April 3, 2021 7 minutes ago, Drew Brees said: Kris Boyd in today’s Sun, talking about John Kennedy. obviously 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dons_1988 Posted April 5, 2021 Share Posted April 5, 2021 https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/56635658 Possibly wrong thread for this but following on from Rangers selfless offer of providing a colt team in League 2 to aid the development of young players for the national team, they have extended that charitable thinking by pointing out that a ban to Nathan Patterson would be damaging to the SFA and Scotland. If only more Scottish clubs had this attitude we may have been world cup winners by now. 7 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DA Baracus Posted April 5, 2021 Share Posted April 5, 2021 (edited) What a load of pish. It's only a few games anyway! If he had a minor injury that saw him out for 4 weeks it would be no different. Also no shock to see Sevco, who have so many massive advantages over everyone else save their pals across Glasgow, wanting yet even more preferential treatment. Shitebags. Edited April 5, 2021 by DA Baracus 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jambomo Posted April 5, 2021 Share Posted April 5, 2021 He’s nowhere near the Scotland team. The idea that Steve Clarke will be raging about a 4 game ban is tremendous 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G51 Posted April 5, 2021 Share Posted April 5, 2021 I think the point that is clumsily being made by Gerrard is that in the context of what actually happened (5 lads from the club and their partners playing a game of Monopoly), a six game ban is disproportionate when compared to other rule breakers this season. Jones and Edmundson had a party with a pile of Glasgow influencers, trying to get their hole in the process, and only got one game more. Bolingoli actually left the country, got his end away, went back into training and shared a pitch with another club when he was most likely to be infectious and got a game less. You can argue the toss on which is more severe because there’s an element of subjectivity to interpreting these rules, but I don’t think it’s ridiculous to hold the opinion that one of those infractions is significantly less severe than the other two, yet the punishments don’t reflect that. The bit about damaging career prospects etc. I don’t really get. Though I’ve said for a while now on here that Gerrard rates Patterson very highly, so it’s interesting to see that reflected in his comments 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dons_1988 Posted April 5, 2021 Share Posted April 5, 2021 4 minutes ago, G51 said: I think the point that is clumsily being made by Gerrard is that in the context of what actually happened (5 lads from the club and their partners playing a game of Monopoly), a six game ban is disproportionate when compared to other rule breakers this season. Jones and Edmundson had a party with a pile of Glasgow influencers, trying to get their hole in the process, and only got one game more. Bolingoli actually left the country, got his end away, went back into training and shared a pitch with another club when he was most likely to be infectious and got a game less. You can argue the toss on which is more severe because there’s an element of subjectivity to interpreting these rules, but I don’t think it’s ridiculous to hold the opinion that one of those infractions is significantly less severe than the other two, yet the punishments don’t reflect that. The bit about damaging career prospects etc. I don’t really get. Though I’ve said for a while now on here that Gerrard rates Patterson very highly, so it’s interesting to see that reflected in his comments I don't have much issue with him contesting the length of ban based on context. The framing of it as damaging to Scotland is quite laughable, however. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AJF Posted April 5, 2021 Share Posted April 5, 2021 6 minutes ago, G51 said: I think the point that is clumsily being made by Gerrard is that in the context of what actually happened (5 lads from the club and their partners playing a game of Monopoly), a six game ban is disproportionate when compared to other rule breakers this season. Jones and Edmundson had a party with a pile of Glasgow influencers, trying to get their hole in the process, and only got one game more. Bolingoli actually left the country, got his end away, went back into training and shared a pitch with another club when he was most likely to be infectious and got a game less. You can argue the toss on which is more severe because there’s an element of subjectivity to interpreting these rules, but I don’t think it’s ridiculous to hold the opinion that one of those infractions is significantly less severe than the other two, yet the punishments don’t reflect that. The bit about damaging career prospects etc. I don’t really get. Though I’ve said for a while now on here that Gerrard rates Patterson very highly, so it’s interesting to see that reflected in his comments Aye, that’s the argument I was trying to make during the week about the severity of the bans seeming disproportionate. Gerrard has really made a bad argument for it though. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wastecoatwilly Posted April 5, 2021 Share Posted April 5, 2021 12 minutes ago, G51 said: I think the point that is clumsily being made by Gerrard is that in the context of what actually happened (5 lads from the club and their partners playing a game of Monopoly), a six game ban is disproportionate when compared to other rule breakers this season. Jones and Edmundson had a party with a pile of Glasgow influencers, trying to get their hole in the process, and only got one game more. Bolingoli actually left the country, got his end away, went back into training and shared a pitch with another club when he was most likely to be infectious and got a game less. You can argue the toss on which is more severe because there’s an element of subjectivity to interpreting these rules, but I don’t think it’s ridiculous to hold the opinion that one of those infractions is significantly less severe than the other two, yet the punishments don’t reflect that. The bit about damaging career prospects etc. I don’t really get. Though I’ve said for a while now on here that Gerrard rates Patterson very highly, so it’s interesting to see that reflected in his comments Angry celebrations and civil unrest on the cards. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.