Granny Danger Posted April 17, 2021 Share Posted April 17, 2021 45 minutes ago, SandyCromarty said: In an informal non political situation she's met with people close to me and they all say she is very much down to earth and genuinely caring for her country, you mentioned her Wee Free connection which may hamper leadership ambitions in some parts of the country. Not sure what you mean by ‘some parts of the country’. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inanimate Carbon Rod Posted April 17, 2021 Share Posted April 17, 2021 1 hour ago, SandyCromarty said: In an informal non political situation she's met with people close to me and they all say she is very much down to earth and genuinely caring for her country, you mentioned her Wee Free connection which may hamper leadership ambitions in some parts of the country. Im not a big fan of the ways of the wee free, but if she doesnt allow her sky fairy beliefs to cloud her decision making or influence policies then batter in and give her a chance. Personally though i’d much prefer Mairi Black as our first post indy president, I love her passion, shes incredibly intelligent and seems to annoy the tories so she would get my vote. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Suspect Device Posted April 17, 2021 Share Posted April 17, 2021 1 hour ago, Granny Danger said: Not sure what you mean by ‘some parts of the country’. The West. Specifically the stupid people in the West. More specifically some bigoted Celtic fans. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G51 Posted April 17, 2021 Share Posted April 17, 2021 Kate Forbes will never be the leader of the SNP because she isn’t from the Central Belt. -2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SANTAN Posted April 17, 2021 Share Posted April 17, 2021 A man said Mairi Black... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Granny Danger Posted April 17, 2021 Share Posted April 17, 2021 23 minutes ago, Suspect Device said: The West. Specifically the stupid people in the West. More specifically some bigoted Celtic fans. I fall into none of these categories yet I have severe reservations about a party leader/potential FM who is engrossed in sky-fairyism of any kind, let alone the nut job variety. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DiegoDiego Posted April 17, 2021 Share Posted April 17, 2021 As long as the leader doesn't use cringeworthy terms like "sky fairy" then I'm okay with them. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SANTAN Posted April 17, 2021 Share Posted April 17, 2021 1 hour ago, DiegoDiego said: As long as the leader doesn't use cringeworthy terms like "sky fairy" then I'm okay with them. Staunch Athiest here. I agree. At least they didn't go full flying spaghetti monster patter. -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BFTD Posted April 17, 2021 Share Posted April 17, 2021 It's always a wee bit of a concern when someone in a position of power considers they have "God told me to" as cover for whatever they fancy getting up to. Even worse if they, and others, genuinely believe it. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HalfCutNinja Posted April 17, 2021 Share Posted April 17, 2021 22 minutes ago, BFTD said: It's always a wee bit of a concern when someone in a position of power considers they have "God told me to" as cover for whatever they fancy getting up to. Even worse if they, and others, genuinely believe it. Will never forget Tony Blair saying God told him to invade Iraq. Aye sure he did mate. In a sane society that would be enough to get you sectioned. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Granny Danger Posted April 17, 2021 Share Posted April 17, 2021 2 hours ago, DiegoDiego said: As long as the leader doesn't use cringeworthy terms like "sky fairy" then I'm okay with them. Even if you feel the term is cringeworthy do you really think its use is worse than someone in a position of power having their decisions influenced by an irrational belief system? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G51 Posted April 17, 2021 Share Posted April 17, 2021 12 minutes ago, Granny Danger said: Even if you feel the term is cringeworthy do you really think its use is worse than someone in a position of power having their decisions influenced by an irrational belief system? bad news for residents of vatican city 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeeTillEhDeh Posted April 17, 2021 Share Posted April 17, 2021 Making a "sky fairy" comment doesn't make you come off as superior or more intelligent, except perhaps among your friends who also draw their self-worth from thinking about how smart they are for being atheists. It just makes you sound ignorant and close-minded, revealing your narrow worldview in which explanations other than your own are always wrong. In that way, you're very similar to those whose religious worldview is so fixed that they feel they must sarcastically mock non-believers, rather than seeking to understand why someone might believe in it (or not believe in it). 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Granny Danger Posted April 17, 2021 Share Posted April 17, 2021 1 hour ago, DeeTillEhDeh said: Making a "sky fairy" comment doesn't make you come off as superior or more intelligent, except perhaps among your friends who also draw their self-worth from thinking about how smart they are for being atheists. It just makes you sound ignorant and close-minded, revealing your narrow worldview in which explanations other than your own are always wrong. In that way, you're very similar to those whose religious worldview is so fixed that they feel they must sarcastically mock non-believers, rather than seeking to understand why someone might believe in it (or not believe in it). That’s pish. It is valid to ‘mock’ people whose world view is shaped or influenced by a belief system. I far prefer rational people, even those whose views I strongly disagree with. There is nothing wrong with a fixed worldview based on rationalism, quite the reverse in fact. To suggest someone is closed minded because they will not buy into an irrational view of the world is pretty nonsensical from a usually switched on poster. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeeTillEhDeh Posted April 17, 2021 Share Posted April 17, 2021 That’s pish. It is valid to ‘mock’ people whose world view is shaped or influenced by a belief system. I far prefer rational people, even those whose views I strongly disagree with. There is nothing wrong with a fixed worldview based on rationalism, quite the reverse in fact. To suggest someone is closed minded because they will not buy into an irrational view of the world is pretty nonsensical from a usually switched on poster. Which is not what I said.You can make a rational argument without resorting to childish pish.It's also quite dangerous ground - by validating the mocking of those who are religious you just make it easier for those who use religion for their own sectarian and often racist agenda.You can make reasoned case for atheism without going down that route.When you use the sky fairy language it just makes you look like an arrogant w****r. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NotThePars Posted April 17, 2021 Share Posted April 17, 2021 2 hours ago, DeeTillEhDeh said: Making a "sky fairy" comment doesn't make you come off as superior or more intelligent, except perhaps among your friends who also draw their self-worth from thinking about how smart they are for being atheists. It just makes you sound ignorant and close-minded, revealing your narrow worldview in which explanations other than your own are always wrong. In that way, you're very similar to those whose religious worldview is so fixed that they feel they must sarcastically mock non-believers, rather than seeking to understand why someone might believe in it (or not believe in it). Chiefly it is shite patter. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DiegoDiego Posted April 17, 2021 Share Posted April 17, 2021 Even if you feel the term is cringeworthy do you really think its use is worse than someone in a position of power having their decisions influenced by an irrational belief system?To be honest, (as my previous post was clearly not entirely serious) I think I'd rather a Christian running Scotland than someone who uses primary school playground insults. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Granny Danger Posted April 17, 2021 Share Posted April 17, 2021 26 minutes ago, DiegoDiego said: 5 hours ago, Granny Danger said: Even if you feel the term is cringeworthy do you really think its use is worse than someone in a position of power having their decisions influenced by an irrational belief system? To be honest, (as my previous post was clearly not entirely serious) I think I'd rather a Christian running Scotland than someone who uses primary school playground insults. Who is it that you thinks uses primary school insults that may end up running Scotland? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Granny Danger Posted April 17, 2021 Share Posted April 17, 2021 2 hours ago, DeeTillEhDeh said: Which is not what I said. You can make a rational argument without resorting to childish pish. It's also quite dangerous ground - by validating the mocking of those who are religious you just make it easier for those who use religion for their own sectarian and often racist agenda. You can make reasoned case for atheism without going down that route. When you use the sky fairy language it just makes you look like an arrogant w****r. I’m certainly not arrogant. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sophia Posted April 17, 2021 Share Posted April 17, 2021 3 hours ago, DeeTillEhDeh said: Which is not what I said. You can make a rational argument without resorting to childish pish. It's also quite dangerous ground - by validating the mocking of those who are religious you just make it easier for those who use religion for their own sectarian and often racist agenda. You can make reasoned case for atheism without going down that route. When you use the sky fairy language it just makes you look like an arrogant w****r. I think it was Dr Jonathan Miller that said he disliked being described as an atheist as there is no word to describe someone that doesn't believe in Santa. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.