Henrik's tongue Posted July 13, 2015 Share Posted July 13, 2015 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stonedsailor Posted July 13, 2015 Share Posted July 13, 2015 Of course you are rhattled, every time you reply to any of my posts you come across as a seething mess, which i find funny as f**k, please continue. Anyway. No8 was not banned for bigotry or any other such nonsense. No posts have been deleted, he was banned by thundermonkey for calling someone a peado, which if you read the posts (thundermonkey clearly didn't) is untrue, he implied torbett was a peado by the way of 2 actual quotes direct from people who worked for celtic, I am sure torbett was convicted in the end, so everything no8 said was actually true. No8 also informs he had no warning points. I can only assume thundermonkey does not like the subject, understandable but I have yet to see the rule that suggests discussing this subject is banning offense. You are posting on behalf of a banned poster? Makes you as bad as an alias account. Either way a banned poster is still having his pish posted on here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hellbhoy Posted July 13, 2015 Share Posted July 13, 2015 Telling the truth offends you? ok Rangers died !, you offended yet ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Henrik's tongue Posted July 13, 2015 Share Posted July 13, 2015 Telling the truth offends you? ok Why did she apologise so vehemently for telling the truth? Surely she wouldn't have felt the need to? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the 67 Posted July 13, 2015 Share Posted July 13, 2015 Telling the truth offends you? ok Oh Tedi do f**k up....we know you are hurting coz yer mate got banned.... but it has to be said that your acting like a petulant wee wean.... grow up ffs......or log off and calm down. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted July 13, 2015 Share Posted July 13, 2015 It might not be a banning offense, but it is offensive. Common decency should tell you it's not a subject for discussion on a football forum No8 was almost gleeful in his point scoring post. Your decision to use a picture of this poor lassie as your avatar is fairly typical of your mentality, cheap, nasty, and crude. Embarrassing. Just went back and reread his posts and I don't think he was being gleeful just responding to posts asking for information regarding the background of the tweet. You have to be fishing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Henrik's tongue Posted July 13, 2015 Share Posted July 13, 2015 Just seems a really strange thing to do. Tell the truth like that...... Then issue a public apology for....... errrm...... telling the truth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hellbhoy Posted July 13, 2015 Share Posted July 13, 2015 Just went back and reread his posts and I don't think he was being gleeful just responding to posts asking for information regarding the background of the tweet. You have to be fishing. It is No8's favourite fucking subject you clueless idiot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave.j Posted July 13, 2015 Share Posted July 13, 2015 Tedi, take a break, pal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the 67 Posted July 13, 2015 Share Posted July 13, 2015 Just went back and reread his posts and I don't think he was being gleeful just responding to posts asking for information regarding the background of the tweet. You have to be fishing. You are fishing....posts have been removed from the bralt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave.j Posted July 13, 2015 Share Posted July 13, 2015 Just went back and reread his posts and I don't think he was being gleeful just responding to posts asking for information regarding the background of the tweet.You have to be fishing. And in the grand scheme of things, your opinion doesn't matter. He's been banned, get over it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Henrik's tongue Posted July 13, 2015 Share Posted July 13, 2015 It is No8's favourite fucking subject you clueless idiot. Oh, bennett is always dancing round the subject too. He's sleekit is oor ben. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hellbhoy Posted July 13, 2015 Share Posted July 13, 2015 Oh, bennett is always dancing round the subject too. He's sleekit is oor ben. Aye I know Henrik, he knows and we know he knows what he is doing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted July 13, 2015 Share Posted July 13, 2015 It is No8's favourite fucking subject you clueless idiot. You're just being silly now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thundermonkey Posted July 13, 2015 Share Posted July 13, 2015 No.8 was banned because he had previously been given 5 warnings, albeit they had been removed for "good behaviour". He had been pulled up for accusing another member of being a paedophile, for homophobic comments and for pushing the BJK stuff. Then there was the cancer mocking. He had had plenty warning and there is no way back. Tedi - defend that or deal with it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stonedsailor Posted July 13, 2015 Share Posted July 13, 2015 One of the good guys. They won you know? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stonedsailor Posted July 13, 2015 Share Posted July 13, 2015 Why would I deal with it? that is surely between you and no 8. I get the homophobic comments are not on and agree that accusing other posters of being a pedophile is also not acceptable I am certainly not going to defend No8 or any other poster on these, but from what I can see neither of these things happened today. Can you confirm that what No8 was actually banned for today was the post in which he quoted 2 people that had inside knowledge of the circumstances surrounding Torbett case, is this what you are describing as 'BJK stuff'? Why does it matter? He is a proven homophobic racist and has been removed. The forum is a better place without that type, any reasonable man would agree. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave.j Posted July 13, 2015 Share Posted July 13, 2015 Why would I deal with it? that is surely between you and no 8. I get the homophobic comments are not on and agree that accusing other posters of being a pedophile is also not acceptable I am certainly not going to defend No8 or any other poster on these, but from what I can see neither of these things happened today. Can you confirm that what No8 was actually banned for today was the post in which he quoted 2 people that had inside knowledge of the circumstances surrounding Torbett case, is this what you are describing as 'BJK stuff'? Pushing: multiple posts. Not just one post. Deal with it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the 67 Posted July 13, 2015 Share Posted July 13, 2015 I have already agreed that these things are not acceptable and it is good for future reference that Thundermonkey has made it extremely clear what he will not tolerate. I am simply looking for clarification on the Torbett discussion, I have not seen a rule that says discussing this is off limits so it will be good to get clarification on this as well. I would imagine the sensible thing would be to give this subject a wide berth.... then there is no risk of a ban or warning Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave.j Posted July 13, 2015 Share Posted July 13, 2015 I am simply looking for clarification on the Torbett discussion, I have not seen a rule that says discussing this is off limits so it will be good to get clarification on this as well. the fact you need clarification, pretty much sums you up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.