welshbairn 18,812 Report post Posted July 14, 2015 Most of the coverage I've seen has been positive tbh. And yes, the question is whether they'll gain or lose support from this. I'd be surprised if the answer to that wasn't gain. The only people upset about this will be Tories and/or SNP Bad types, both of whom would never (or can't) vote for the SNP anyway. If it's Cameron's EVEL plans they want to fight it's the hardcore Tory Unionists who are concerned it would lead to the break up of the Union whose vote they need, not the progressive lefties. 0 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
doulikefish 4,240 Report post Posted July 14, 2015 Nope am happy the snp have settled into westminster life you know make a promise then discard it as soon as possible wibble 0 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Andre Drazen 5,043 Report post Posted July 14, 2015 Kevthefuckingthicko 0 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ludo*1 10,000 Report post Posted July 14, 2015 Aye right. Because fox-hunting is so much the topic of conversation in Dundee's households right now . . . Did anyone say that? What I did say was, that people got in touch with their MP's because they felt it was an issue they should act on. 0 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
H_B 1,715 Report post Posted July 14, 2015 Did anyone say that? What I did say was, that people got in touch with their MP's because they felt it was an issue they should act on. Thousands of them you claimed... Got any proof for that claim? Sounds utter utter lies. 0 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ad Lib 2,457 Report post Posted July 14, 2015 If their motive is just to give the Tories a bloody nose and to remind them that they have a small majority, both of which involve sacrificing a long-held principled self-denying ordinance, why don't the SNP break another of their long-held principled self-denying ordinances concerning legitimacy and Parliamentary procedure and nominate Lords? At least that way they could actually vote in a chamber that has an opposition majority and which can block indefinitely anything not falling within the strict parameters of the Tory manifesto. If you're going to give a bloody nose, at least make sure you actually land a punch. -1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
vikingTON 15,577 Report post Posted July 14, 2015 The above busted flush nonsense is why you failed to hold onto your deposit champ. 0 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ludo*1 10,000 Report post Posted July 14, 2015 Thousands of them you claimed... Got any proof for that claim? Sounds utter utter lies. Does it aye? Nice one. 0 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kevthedee 813 Report post Posted July 14, 2015 Kevthefuckingthicko Yawn. 0 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BerwickMad 650 Report post Posted July 14, 2015 Out of interest, in the Scottish Parliament do the SNP have rebel MSPs? So far in Westminster they seem to vote all together, tweet what they're told and basically do whatever they're told by the party. -1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Colkitto 1,199 Report post Posted July 14, 2015 If their motive is just to give the Tories a bloody nose and to remind them that they have a small majority, both of which involve sacrificing a long-held principled self-denying ordinance, why don't the SNP break another of their long-held principled self-denying ordinances concerning legitimacy and Parliamentary procedure and nominate Lords? At least that way they could actually vote in a chamber that has an opposition majority and which can block indefinitely anything not falling within the strict parameters of the Tory manifesto. If you're going to give a bloody nose, at least make sure you actually land a punch. Yes, that's a big vote winner right there... 0 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Colkitto 1,199 Report post Posted July 14, 2015 Would EVEL be good or bad for the Union? 0 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ad Lib 2,457 Report post Posted July 14, 2015 Yes, that's a big vote winner right there... Why is winning votes, for a party that already commands a strong plurality of the Scottish electorate, more important than using their influence to produce better policies? 0 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Airdrie Onions 22 Report post Posted July 14, 2015 Why is winning votes, for a party that already commands a strong plurality of the Scottish electorate, more important than using their influence to produce better policies? Because they're politicians, winning votes is number 1 priority. 0 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
vikingTON 15,577 Report post Posted July 14, 2015 What would the Busted Flushes know about either a) winning votes or b) having influence? Answers in a S.A.E. plus a postal order for £5 to the Busted Flushes' Lost Deposit Fund - winner gets to stand for the party in a seat of your choice in May 2016. 0 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Dipped Flake 90 Report post Posted July 14, 2015 was in two minds about the SNP voting this plan down but if the right-wing don't like it, it must be good. Watching the seethe from the britnats on here has made my day so well done the SNP 0 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
AUFC90 852 Report post Posted July 14, 2015 was in two minds about the SNP voting this plan down but if the right-wing don't like it, it must be good. Watching the seethe from the britnats on here has made my day so well done the SNP Yep, I'm happy for them to vote on anything that produces so much right wing seethe. 0 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
H_B 1,715 Report post Posted July 14, 2015 Does it aye? Nice one. So these "thousands" who have been contacting their MPs about the issue aye? Your evidence for this even more laughable bit of nonsense than your usual drivel being... what? 0 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Pete's Frontier 56 Report post Posted July 14, 2015 I'm against fox hunting but it's obvious Frau Sturgeon is just politicking on the issue. Gnats seem happy enough with anything that upsets Dave and co so it's an easy tap in. 0 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MarkoRaj 1,285 Report post Posted July 14, 2015 was in two minds about the SNP voting this plan down but if the right-wing don't like it, it must be good. Watching the seethe from the britnats on here has made my day so well done the SNP Yes despite all the crowing from HB and others about people supporting the SNP like a football team, you only have to go back to the first few pages of this thread to see that even the most fervent indy/snp supporters were mostly in 2 minds about this issue. Having seen the seethe generated I have to concur with your view that this was worth it. 0 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites