Broccoli Dog Posted August 22, 2015 Share Posted August 22, 2015 Forget that, no denial that Corbyn is a f*ckin Republician apologist toad then?? He's a f*ckin enemy of this country, how can he be a credible leader of HM's opposition, with the divisive and repulsive views that he holds dear. Hopefully once Corbyn is PM he can offload that shitehole of a statelet back to the Irish where it belongs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NotThePars Posted August 22, 2015 Share Posted August 22, 2015 Tried searching 'Liz Kendal' on my twitter search bar. Came up with 'Liz Kendall NWA' and 'Liz Kendall Dr Dre'. Some of what Mensch is saying I think is fair enough though. There seems to be this tendency to say 'zionist' when making anti-Semitic comments. If the comment is genuinely aimed at Zionism that is fora enough. All too often however they use anti-semetic stereotypes. One defence I got was 'Jews weren't quick enough to denounce Israel' which was a wonderful defence against the claim they were anti-semetic as they actually managed to be anti-semetic in their defence against the claim they were anti-semetic. Mensch has absolutely no credibility in this argument. She's searched offensive terms herself and tried to pin it on Corbyn supporters, she claimed the Jewish founder of Zionism must be anti-semitic because anyone who uses the term 'Zionist' must be anti-semitic and as someone else pointed out last night on Twitter, it's odd that she pursues the "your friends are problematic" line against Corbyn when some of her friends have literally turned out to be paedophile a. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedRob72 Posted August 22, 2015 Share Posted August 22, 2015 He's managed to get re elected for 32 years. That would suggest not everyone finds him an 'enemy of this Country' Your 'Enemy of this country list' must make for interesting reading. Sadly it seems to grow longer and longer these days. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alan Stubbs Posted August 22, 2015 Share Posted August 22, 2015 I believe Corbyn's position is that he's a stated republican but as he knows there isn't a democratic will for removing the Monarchy, he wouldn't pursue it if he wins. If anyone objects to that, there's really no ambiguity about it, they're an out and out bigot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeeTillEhDeh Posted August 22, 2015 Share Posted August 22, 2015 I believe Corbyn's position is that he's a stated republican but as he knows there isn't a democratic will for removing the Monarchy, he wouldn't pursue it if he wins. If anyone objects to that, there's really no ambiguity about it, they're an out and out bigot. When Rob is talking about Corbyn's Republican sympathies I don't think he means regards the monarchy but towards Sinn Fein. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedRob72 Posted August 22, 2015 Share Posted August 22, 2015 I believe Corbyn's position is that he's a stated republican but as he knows there isn't a democratic will for removing the Monarchy, he wouldn't pursue it if he wins. If anyone objects to that, there's really no ambiguity about it, they're an out and out bigot. He chose to support the bombers rather than the ballot box for years, nothing bigoted about that fact at all Stubbsy! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jmothecat Posted August 22, 2015 Share Posted August 22, 2015 Mensch has absolutely no credibility in this argument. She's searched offensive terms herself and tried to pin it on Corbyn supporters, she claimed the Jewish founder of Zionism must be anti-semitic because anyone who uses the term 'Zionist' must be anti-semitic and as someone else pointed out last night on Twitter, it's odd that she pursues the "your friends are problematic" line against Corbyn when some of her friends have literally turned out to be paedophile a. To be fair to Mensch did she not go straight to the police when she found out about that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alan Stubbs Posted August 22, 2015 Share Posted August 22, 2015 Apologies - I took the "republican sympathiser" bit too literally then. You'll know more about this than me but isn't his supposed "support" for the Ra based on him supporting the Troops Out campaign and something about inviting Gerry Adams to speak in London? I'm willing to admit my ignorance if there's something I'm unaware of but from I know of the situation, it sounds like Corbyn was well ahead of the Westminster curve when it came to respecting democracy and diplomacy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mjw Posted August 22, 2015 Share Posted August 22, 2015 He chose to support the bombers rather than the ballot box for years, nothing bigoted about that fact at all Stubbsy!The same bombers the British State were talking to all the way back to the 70s.John Major stood in Parliament saying no deals could be done with terrorists while talks were going on behind the scenes. Is John Major on your 'list'? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Lambies Doos Posted August 22, 2015 Share Posted August 22, 2015 Is Corbyn still the overwhelming favourite? Hope he wins... labour will be unelectable for decades.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedRob72 Posted August 22, 2015 Share Posted August 22, 2015 The same bombers the British State were talking to all the way back to the 70s. John Major stood in Parliament saying no deals could be done with terrorists while talks were going on behind the scenes. Is John Major on your 'list'? Nice deflection there, successive governments tried with varying levels of success to deal directly with the Provos, it doesn't mean they actively supported them. Corbyn shamelessly did. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~~~ Posted August 22, 2015 Share Posted August 22, 2015 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AUFC90 Posted August 22, 2015 Share Posted August 22, 2015 Nice deflection there, successive governments tried with varying levels of success to deal directly with the Provos, it doesn't mean they actively supported them. Corbyn shamelessly did. In what way ? Can you evidence this please ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedRob72 Posted August 22, 2015 Share Posted August 22, 2015 Apologies - I took the "republican sympathiser" bit too literally then. You'll know more about this than me but isn't his supposed "support" for the Ra based on him supporting the Troops Out campaign and something about inviting Gerry Adams to speak in London? I'm willing to admit my ignorance if there's something I'm unaware of but from I know of the situation, it sounds like Corbyn was well ahead of the Westminster curve when it came to respecting democracy and diplomacy. He wasn't well ahead of the game at all, he wasn't a mediator, he was an active supporter and still to this day will not condemn the slaughter of innocents at the hands of militant republicans. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mjw Posted August 22, 2015 Share Posted August 22, 2015 Nice deflection there, successive governments tried with varying levels of success to deal directly with the Provos, it doesn't mean they actively supported them. Corbyn shamelessly did.No,The British state was to busy colluding with the other side. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedRob72 Posted August 22, 2015 Share Posted August 22, 2015 In what way ? Can you evidence this please ? Your on a f*ckin wind up eh? Try his observation of a minutes silence following Loughgall? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedRob72 Posted August 22, 2015 Share Posted August 22, 2015 No,The British state was to busy colluding with the other side. I wouldn't deny that, they were just as bad, terrorism is evil no matter which flag you hide behind. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lanky_ffc Posted August 22, 2015 Share Posted August 22, 2015 http://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/louise-mensch-blames-corbyn-supporters-for-antisemitism--turns-out-its-her-own-offensive-search-history-10466928.html Prescott laying into Mensch ???? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AUFC90 Posted August 22, 2015 Share Posted August 22, 2015 Your on a f*ckin wind up eh? Try his observation of a minutes silence following Loughgall? Try nothing. You said he actively supports terrorists and is an enemy of Britain. Evidence bigot boy ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedRob72 Posted August 22, 2015 Share Posted August 22, 2015 Try nothing. You said he actively supports terrorists and is an enemy of Britain. Evidence bigot boy ? How about his tacit support for Hamas, Hezbollah or those who deny the Holocaust, who's the f*ckin Bigot ya clown. Not just an enemy of Britain eh? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.