C4mmy31 Posted January 7, 2018 Share Posted January 7, 2018 Hopefully this is accurate about Naismith .... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
killiepiemuncher Posted January 7, 2018 Share Posted January 7, 2018 Hopefully this is accurate about Naismith .... I don’t think Billy Bowie or anybody will be funding half his wages. He must be on £50K a week down south. Dream on. ETA apparently he’s on £35000 a week, still no chance. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueKillie Posted January 8, 2018 Share Posted January 8, 2018 Can they just come out and say we've signed him or no already, these rumours are nuts 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Godric1970 Posted January 8, 2018 Share Posted January 8, 2018 On 05/01/2018 at 16:29, killienick said: I'm hoping for a plain Oxford Blue top and my avatar on the chest. We have to do something for our 150th birthday. the crest had a chequer board like we we do now except it was between the ball and the hand 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
killienick Posted January 8, 2018 Share Posted January 8, 2018 Who do they have to get dispensation from?From UEFA apparently.Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Squirrelhumper Posted January 8, 2018 Share Posted January 8, 2018 9 hours ago, killiepiemuncher said: I don’t think Billy Bowie or anybody will be funding half his wages. He must be on £50K a week down south. Dream on. ETA apparently he’s on £35000 a week, still no chance. 65k..... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C4mmy31 Posted January 8, 2018 Share Posted January 8, 2018 65k..... Perhaps BB is willing to pay half the portion of Naismith's wage Norwich want Killie to contribute towards a loan deal? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
killiepiemuncher Posted January 8, 2018 Share Posted January 8, 2018 Do we really want him, he seems desperate to play for nothing elsewhere. https://www.thescottishsun.co.uk/football/ 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fide Posted January 8, 2018 Share Posted January 8, 2018 7 minutes ago, killiepiemuncher said: Do we really want him, he seems desperate to play for nothing elsewhere.https://www.thescottishsun.co.uk/football/ That's lifted from Follow Follow. No basis in truth apparently. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C4mmy31 Posted January 8, 2018 Share Posted January 8, 2018 Scotland forward Steven Naismith is likely to leave Norwich City on loan in January, BBC Scotland has learned.Naismith, 31, has not featured in the Canaries first team since August.Two English clubs have agreed to pay the £10,000 a week of Naismith's salary that Norwich are demanding for the player to be loaned out.However, the choice of where the player ends up for the rest of the season will be down to Naismith, who has 45 international caps.After spells at Kilmarnock and Rangers, Naismith moved to Everton in 2012 and Norwich three-and-a-half years later.The player indicated last month that a return to Rangers would be of interest.With more than 423 club appearances to his name, Naismith has scored 109 senior goals, including seven at international level.(BBC Scotland) 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C4mmy31 Posted January 8, 2018 Share Posted January 8, 2018 I don't think he's too happy now Kirsten has banned him till at least the end of the season [emoji23] [emoji122] [emoji24] .... 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Busta Nut Posted January 9, 2018 Share Posted January 9, 2018 not enough sawyers chat on here imo 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deadasdillinger Posted January 9, 2018 Share Posted January 9, 2018 He thinks the whole world is against him. I get same bus as him and he came back on after Dundee moaning he'd been chucked out, and that it was only because it was him that clubs were targeting him for special treatment. Turned out he had been thrown out for smoking in the toilets. So nothing to do with who he is and everything to do with breaking the law. 7 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paul wright scores Posted January 9, 2018 Share Posted January 9, 2018 1 hour ago, deadasdillinger said: Turned out he had been thrown out for smoking in the toilets. So nothing to do with who he is and everything to do with breaking the law. He was sitting just to the right of where I was sitting that game in the first half and I noticed he wasn't there in the 2nd half. What a muppet he is, smoking in the wooden "stand" at Dens. He should have been charged for doing so. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fide Posted January 10, 2018 Share Posted January 10, 2018 He's a fucking idiot and an embarrassment to the club and his family. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bunglebonce Posted January 10, 2018 Share Posted January 10, 2018 14 hours ago, Busta Nut said: not enough sawyers chat on here imo One of his rants is mixed into some others (guessing ArsenalTV) as an interlude in this week's Second Captains podcast, about 2/3 in IIRC. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy_K_97 Posted January 10, 2018 Share Posted January 10, 2018 I do feel a bit for the guy - he's obviously got issues with his anger if that's how he's behaving in public and on social media. It's all very well for people to go "hahahaha look at this dafty he's pure raging" but it's just stigmatising people with similar problems and doesn't help anything. However it's quite obvious that he thinks he can get away with more than he actually can (the Neil McCann incident, smoking in the toilets at Dens etc) and it's a very simple issue. He didn't get banned because of who he was - he got banned because he violated the terms of issue of our season tickets and if you break those rules you can't argue it, you just have to take your punishment. He's an irrelevance who had his moment in the sun (if you can even call it that) and he's increasingly scrambling for attention in any form. People just need to ignore him and he'll go away. One of the many reasons I was enjoying us not being completely crap any more under Clarke was that his videos suddenly disappeared. I thought the SC Effect could work wonders on absolutely everything, but obviously not quite yet. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Busta Nut Posted January 10, 2018 Share Posted January 10, 2018 What was the McCann incident? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
craigkillie Posted January 10, 2018 Share Posted January 10, 2018 He took Maddie. 14 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dindeleux Posted January 10, 2018 Share Posted January 10, 2018 2 hours ago, Andy_K_97 said: I do feel a bit for the guy - he's obviously got issues with his anger if that's how he's behaving in public and on social media. It's all very well for people to go "hahahaha look at this dafty he's pure raging" but it's just stigmatising people with similar problems and doesn't help anything. However it's quite obvious that he thinks he can get away with more than he actually can (the Neil McCann incident, smoking in the toilets at Dens etc) and it's a very simple issue. He didn't get banned because of who he was - he got banned because he violated the terms of issue of our season tickets and if you break those rules you can't argue it, you just have to take your punishment. He's an irrelevance who had his moment in the sun (if you can even call it that) and he's increasingly scrambling for attention in any form. People just need to ignore him and he'll go away. One of the many reasons I was enjoying us not being completely crap any more under Clarke was that his videos suddenly disappeared. I thought the SC Effect could work wonders on absolutely everything, but obviously not quite yet. I'm sorry but I'm just not buying it from a mental health point of view. You could use that reasoning for absolutely anything that anyone does. Sawers is just an absolute fanny. His facebook post confirms this (if there was any doubt prior to it). f**k him. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.