Tom McB Posted December 29, 2014 Share Posted December 29, 2014 http://money.cnn.com/2014/12/22/news/economy/saudi-arabia-oil-production/ Spot on. The saudis are enjoying giving Iran, who they hate and fear, a sound doing. The fact that it fucks up Venezuela and Putinistan is neither here nor there to them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
H_B Posted December 29, 2014 Share Posted December 29, 2014 I must've hit a nerve. I'll leave the pedantry and trolling to the saddest person on the forum. Poor HB. He's forgot what a clit looks like How creepy is this post? Ewww Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom McB Posted December 29, 2014 Share Posted December 29, 2014 Opec aren't decreasing production at the behest of the Americans. That much is obvious. How much longer they can keep it up ? No one knows. The Sauduis still make a profit on oil at $60 dollars, and they have enormous amounts of sovereign wealth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AUFC90 Posted December 29, 2014 Share Posted December 29, 2014 The Sauduis still make a profit on oil at $60 dollars, and they have enormous amounts of sovereign wealth.Keeping it so low for so long hampers their budget and Saudi Arabia isn't the only country in OPEC. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ecto Posted December 29, 2014 Share Posted December 29, 2014 Why rage at Yessers? We'd all take devomax now. It's just the methods. This is not me "raging" at anyone, in a previous part of my life I have done the "raging" bit, I was not a good guy, now I am so laid back, I have "rage" at nothing and no one, life is to short, am not sure about everyone taking "DevoMax", there are some "ragers" on here who still be "banging" on about #indyref2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HaikuHibee Posted December 29, 2014 Share Posted December 29, 2014 Spot on. The saudis are enjoying giving Iran, who they hate and fear, a sound doing. The fact that it fucks up Venezuela and Putinistan is neither here nor there to them. http://www.news.com.au/finance/economy/saudi-arabia-racks-up-48-billion-deficit-as-oil-price-crash-hits-government-revenue/story-e6frflo9-1227167184725 http://rt.com/op-edge/218295-saudi-arabia-oil-prices/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
placidcasual Posted December 29, 2014 Share Posted December 29, 2014 I think Santa needs to bring you a calculator for next Xmas Confidemus. Has he explained why he felt the need to get a new account? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NotThePars Posted December 29, 2014 Share Posted December 29, 2014 If there's one thing 2014 wasn't, it was the year of independence. In much the same way as 1945 wasn't the year of German victory. So we've got a few World Cup victories and eventual economic domination of Europe to look forward to? Result. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ecto Posted December 29, 2014 Share Posted December 29, 2014 "Unionists cannot have it both ways. They cannot argue that this is a union, a family of nations, and all the other stuff they say and then start whingeing and whining when people from Scotland form part of a majority government. That would not do at all." http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-30623652 Well said Stewart Hosie. Not sure Hosie could have said any different, bit of a non-story, really Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ecto Posted December 29, 2014 Share Posted December 29, 2014 Unionists seem to have different ideas. They like to remind us all what a great family of nations we are. But as soon as Scotland finds itself with the power to influence the UK Government, Unionists are screaming for constitutional change. not got the power to influence yet thought what happened in September when victory was pronounced 10days before Sept 18th,that before you had members of the SNP sitting around the cabinet table that you would wait until after the GE result was known, just a thought Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ecto Posted December 29, 2014 Share Posted December 29, 2014 You make it seem like you don't want Scotland to have much influence on UK wide matters. But don't seem to take issue with the UK having influence on Scottish matters. What does that feel like? What does it feel like to be a unionist? The more power Scotland has within the UK the better, but I would prefer that influence to be from Scottish Labour MPs, not the SNP Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Todders Posted December 29, 2014 Share Posted December 29, 2014 so you're a typical "party first - country second" labourite? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ecto Posted December 29, 2014 Share Posted December 29, 2014 so you're a typical "party first - country second" labourite? if that is the thought that gets you through the night, fill your boots, now off you pop Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ecto Posted December 29, 2014 Share Posted December 29, 2014 so you're a typical "party first - country second" labourite? if that is the thought that gets you through the night, fill your boots, now off you pop Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ecto Posted December 29, 2014 Share Posted December 29, 2014 Bloody phone don't know why that come out twice Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Todders Posted December 29, 2014 Share Posted December 29, 2014 Isn't that what you implied? You accept the more power is good for Scotland but you don't want it unless it is the Scottish Labour branch office that's wielding it? The very definition of the party before principles attitude that is destroying Labour. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ecto Posted December 29, 2014 Share Posted December 29, 2014 Isn't that what you implied? You accept the more power is good for Scotland but you don't want it unless it is the Scottish Labour branch office that's wielding it? The very definition of the party before principles attitude that is destroying Labour. I think Scotland would be best served by more Scottish Labour MPs in a majority Labour Government , than by the SNP propping up a minority Labour Government, that view you may not agree with, I care not a jot if this is the case Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HaikuHibee Posted December 29, 2014 Share Posted December 29, 2014 Isn't that what you implied? You accept the more power is good for Scotland but you don't want it unless it is the Scottish Labour branch office that's wielding it? The very definition of the party before principles attitude that is destroying Labour. Don't get it either. Some folk see them as left-wing. Think that might change soon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ecto Posted December 29, 2014 Share Posted December 29, 2014 Don't get it either. Some folk see them as left-wing. Think that might change soon. just like you to stick your "ore" in, when it is not required, so do us all a favour and "do one" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Todders Posted December 29, 2014 Share Posted December 29, 2014 I think Scotland would be best served by more Scottish Labour MPs in a majority Labour Government , than by the SNP propping up a minority Labour Government, that view you may not agree with, I care not a jot if this is the case Would you or would you not like to see more powers for Scotland regardless of who is in charge? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.