craigkillie Posted October 7, 2015 Share Posted October 7, 2015 http://chrisspivey.org/behind-the-flag-and-down-the-rabbit-hole-we-go/ I started reading that, and I don't understand what's going on. I get the rationale that people have for suggesting that terrorist attacks are false flags to keep people frightened etc, but why would they have one in this case? Can just imagine the government deciding to go to all of that effort to construct a fucking accidental lorry crash. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
throbber Posted October 7, 2015 Share Posted October 7, 2015 The hegelian dialectic. I don't see it myself but something is not right with this case. What's wrong with it ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hillonearth Posted October 7, 2015 Share Posted October 7, 2015 Well yeah, something's wrong with the case - a guy who should have never been driving finally ran out of luck and six poor punters had even less luck by being in the wrong place at the wrong time. That page is hilarious, and illustrates where so many conspiracy theorists fall down, by seeing conspiracies absolutely everywhere. Nothing can just happen at random and there always has to be some shady force at work, If the writer's pre-convinced, it's easy to see coincidences where there are none, e.g. The driver's name was apparently Clarke. There was a Scottish racing driver called Jim Clark who died in a car crash.... He ostensibly liked chicken and mushroom pot noodles - is the indicative of playing chicken on the road? There's a dish called mushroom en croute, which sounds a bit like "en route" which he was at the time of the crash. WE SHOULD BE TOLD. That page is on that level. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ned Nederlander Posted October 7, 2015 Share Posted October 7, 2015 I started reading that, and I don't understand what's going on. I get the rationale that people have for suggesting that terrorist attacks are false flags to keep people frightened etc, but why would they have one in this case? Can just imagine the government deciding to go to all of that effort to construct a fucking accidental lorry crash. I started reading it but couldn't follow it, it's all over the place and confusing and there's reams of the stuff. So having said I haven't read it I'm perhaps doing the author a disservice by dismissing it so quickly and utterly, does he at any point explain why the f'ck anyone would go to so much trouble to pretend to kill some folk in Glasgow, am I missing something obvious? It's actually all a little obscene. And having skimmed most of it I get to the pictures at the bottom which I think is him dissecting the pretend witnesses social media profiles!? His sure fire way of identifying how to come up with a fake account is this: "Course, these people living fictional lives via social media do all seem to lack imagination. Indeed, their photos – especially in the case of females – will be made up of nights out in the pub with 5 or 6 equally fake characters all standing in a line with one leg straight and the other slightly bent. Then there will be at least another half dozen made up of them drinking their cocktail through a straw or giving the camera a thumbs up. Another half a dozen or so will be photos of them cuddling up to 3 or 4 different blokes and then there will be the cleavage shots, the kissing their bessie mate shots and the bikini shots – which are usually my favorite. Indeed there will also be at least one big event included, usually an exotic holiday, but concerts and even Wimbledon are not out of the ordinary." So basically every single social media page in the entire fucking World!!?? The guy has spent a lot of utterly pointless time on this, he's convinced that the World is not as it seems and, of course, that only him and people like him can think for themselves. He's an utter bellend of dangerous proportions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarkoRaj Posted October 7, 2015 Share Posted October 7, 2015 I enjoyed that page. What a fruitcake Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miguel Sanchez Posted October 7, 2015 Share Posted October 7, 2015 The size of that fucking page Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cardinal Richelieu Posted October 7, 2015 Share Posted October 7, 2015 I'm friends with a few of these types of zoomers on Facebook (they're otherwise harmless and good for comedy value). One of them posted a link to some numerology expert who was world renowned amongst fellow nutters in that she could see patterns that the rest of us mere mortals couldn't. (Not dissimilar to people who have claimed to crack roulette through intensive analysis of random numbers). One of the highlights of this diatribe concerned the 2012 Olympic Opening Ceremony. It was about the time that Stuart Hazell was found guilty of murdering a wee lassie. During the ceremony, they had a bit about Great Ormond Street Hospital, where its initials GOSH, were spelled out by a big group of people. According to this numerology expert, the wee lassie was actually murdered by the Illuminati (no, not the one on this board), and the words GOSH actually pertained to GO Stuart Hazell ... a secret message to other members of this shadowy organisation. Because it's much safer to do it in front of 1 billion viewers rather than by the privacy of an email or text. Utter heid-the-baws. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Honest_Man#1 Posted October 7, 2015 Share Posted October 7, 2015 I get the feeling that wisbit is one of these fruitcakes who believes the illuminati exists. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
throbber Posted October 8, 2015 Share Posted October 8, 2015 You don't need to be a fruit cake to believe in the illuminati and this is not the thread to discuss these matters Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sweet Pete Posted October 8, 2015 Share Posted October 8, 2015 The hegelian dialectic. I don't see it myself but something is not right with this case. You just plumb new depths on here all the time, don't you. What a fucking loser. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bobby Skidmarks Posted October 8, 2015 Share Posted October 8, 2015 Just to be clear, i was merely giving a name to something CraigKillie had described with a short comment on how i DIDN'T see it myself and that something wasn't right about the whole case, this can be verified by the amount of posts it has mustered in this thread. Too many eager to jump in with two feet trying to bring down my every post, pathetic. You make me sick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
carpetmonster Posted October 10, 2015 Share Posted October 10, 2015 You don't need to be a fruit cake to believe in the illuminati and this is not the thread to discuss these matters You don't have to be, but David Icke being your rep probably isn't winning anyone any favours. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mjw Posted October 30, 2015 Share Posted October 30, 2015 BREAKING: Sky sources- Glasgow bin lorry driver Harry Clarke has resigned mins before disciplinary hearing that was going to sack him Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lofarl Posted October 30, 2015 Share Posted October 30, 2015 So he has resigned just before getting sacked. Wouldn't want a black mark like a sacking to tarnish your reputation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rugster Posted October 30, 2015 Share Posted October 30, 2015 c**t. They should refuse to accept it and hold the disciplinary anyway. He's fucked anyway, photos of his fat baldy bonce will put paid to most job applications. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boghead ranter Posted October 30, 2015 Share Posted October 30, 2015 This photo's crying out for someone to remove 'surface' and add 'b*****d' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fide Posted October 30, 2015 Share Posted October 30, 2015 His family must be so proud of him. #strength Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fide Posted October 30, 2015 Share Posted October 30, 2015 Sterling work Mozza. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cardinal Richelieu Posted October 30, 2015 Share Posted October 30, 2015 What an honourable chap. Edit: Harry Clarke, not Mozzamozza. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Waspy Posted October 30, 2015 Share Posted October 30, 2015 c**t. They should refuse to accept it and hold the disciplinary anyway. He's fucked anyway, photos of his fat baldy bonce will put paid to most job applications. He will be happy enough with his council pension. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.