THE KING Posted December 16, 2014 Share Posted December 16, 2014 Mmm... seem to recall the same legal eagles making the exact same claim before the appeal. Which your scumbag club and racist player lost as well. How many appeals will it take before Celtic actually admit to having supported a proven racist? Trying to hard mate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LordHawHaw Posted December 16, 2014 Share Posted December 16, 2014 Correct. AFC do not love rapists, nor racists. Then you put up with them, racists that is, judging by my trips up there Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bobby Skidmarks Posted December 16, 2014 Share Posted December 16, 2014 Then you put up with them, racists that is, judging by my trips up there Never happened. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drew Brees Posted December 16, 2014 Share Posted December 16, 2014 Excuse me? Would you like to expand on that? The evidence against goodwillie was the same as the evidence against tonev. One persons word against another. The PF decided that that isn't enough to convict goodwillie though the accusation is still there, and the sfa decided that that is enough to convict. I don't see the difference. I've no idea if both are guilty, innocent or if only one is, no one here knows either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Saintee Posted December 16, 2014 Share Posted December 16, 2014 Can any Aberdeen fan clarify if the wind at Pittodrie is racist? Or if it just makes racist sounding noises? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
P45 Posted December 16, 2014 Share Posted December 16, 2014 Celtic have had a nightmare here. They should just have kept it all internal. Dignity is not their style though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LordHawHaw Posted December 16, 2014 Share Posted December 16, 2014 Never happened. The panel says it is likely that it did, and the match ban remains, your forensic analysis and support of our player is admirable but misplaced methinks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
williemillersmoustache Posted December 16, 2014 Share Posted December 16, 2014 The evidence against goodwillie was the same as the evidence against tonev. One persons word against another. The PF decided that that isn't enough to convict goodwillie though the accusation is still there, and the sfa decided that that is enough to convict. I don't see the difference. I've no idea if both are guilty, innocent or if only one is, no one here knows either. Goodwille has never been accused of raping an opponent on the field. LOL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheCelt67 Posted December 16, 2014 Share Posted December 16, 2014 Personally, I think it's time to cancel the loan deal and send him back to Villa. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RawB93 Posted December 16, 2014 Share Posted December 16, 2014 Just when The Rangers were getting all the attention, Celtic somehow manage to pull themselves back level. It's gonna be an interesting one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Saintee Posted December 16, 2014 Share Posted December 16, 2014 Did David Goodwillie rape Shay Logan? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LordHawHaw Posted December 16, 2014 Share Posted December 16, 2014 Personally, I think it's time to cancel the loan deal and send him back to Villa. Me too Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
youngsy Posted December 16, 2014 Share Posted December 16, 2014 We could do without the tedious point scoring from supporters of like-minded, shitebox clubs such as Rangers tbh. No doubt you'll include Hearts fans in this tedious point scoring or are you just going to be hypocritical and ignore your own fans previous in racist abuse. Does the name Mark Walters ring a bell? Or maybe the name Lyndon Andrews or what about the Aberdeen players, Eric Deloumeaux and Leon Mike. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Podlie Posted December 16, 2014 Share Posted December 16, 2014 The evidence against goodwillie was the same as the evidence against tonev. One persons word against another. The PF decided that that isn't enough to convict goodwillie though the accusation is still there, and the sfa decided that that is enough to convict. I don't see the difference. I've no idea if both are guilty, innocent or if only one is, no one here knows either. PF would use beyond reasonable doubt, this uses on the balance of probabilities, hence difference. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim McLean's Ghost Posted December 16, 2014 Share Posted December 16, 2014 The evidence against goodwillie was the same as the evidence against tonev. One persons word against another. The PF decided that that isn't enough to convict goodwillie though the accusation is still there, and the sfa decided that that is enough to convict. I don't see the difference. I've no idea if both are guilty, innocent or if only one is, no one here knows either. You don't see the difference between being sent to jail and having to miss 2 months of football? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shuggie_Murray7 Posted December 16, 2014 Share Posted December 16, 2014 Racism has gotten away with only a caution here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sergie's no1 fan Posted December 16, 2014 Share Posted December 16, 2014 Dear oh dear Celtic fans . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheCelt67 Posted December 16, 2014 Share Posted December 16, 2014 well said. however your club are not willing to show racism the red card, this must be embarrassing for supporters who don't agree with the party line, been there myself. It's a bit of an awkward one. Whilst I don't agree with it, I can understand the reasoning behind Celtic looking to take it further. Personally, I have pretty much no doubt now that he has in fact used a racial slur towards Logan, so he should be chased out of the club pronto, but if Celtic do believe that there wasn't sufficient evidence then there is every right to appeal......though I do believe it's more to do with the fact that we nailed our support for Tonev to the mast, so in order to try and save face we need to try and push it as far as it can go in the small chance that maybe he was innocent all along, something I don't see happening. Like I say, we should just get rid of him, and as soon as possible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bobby Skidmarks Posted December 16, 2014 Share Posted December 16, 2014 The panel says it is likely that it did, and the match ban remains, your forensic analysis and support of our player is admirable but misplaced methinks Making a joke about it is particularly classy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
H_B Posted December 16, 2014 Share Posted December 16, 2014 It's a bit of an awkward one. Whilst I don't agree with it, I can understand the reasoning behind Celtic looking to take it further. Can you? What is it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.