welshbairn Posted December 16, 2014 Share Posted December 16, 2014 I'm merely stating facts and you are making accusations. I'll ask you one more time to point out where I have said Tonev is innocent. Where would you say he was on the balance of probabilities? And if there are only two witnesses is it ok for the panel to decide on who seems more believable, or should they dismiss the complaint? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nizzy Posted December 16, 2014 Share Posted December 16, 2014 The facts: Two separate panels have ruled that Tonev directed a racist slur at an opponent. I expect those fact-loving Celtic fans will accept this and say no more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nizzy Posted December 16, 2014 Share Posted December 16, 2014 Heres some facts...... .. IT IS Scotland's whitest city. Now, officially at least, Aberdeen is also the most racist. Figures released yesterday show Europe's self-styled "oil capital" has racked up more reports of racism per head than any other local authority area in Scotland. The pinnacle of whataboutery. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
williemillersmoustache Posted December 16, 2014 Author Share Posted December 16, 2014 Racist, disability mocking, whataboutery, that's special. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THE KING Posted December 16, 2014 Share Posted December 16, 2014 The pinnacle of whataboutery. Well i guess if an entire club and support can be branded racists or racist appologists because of 1 player...then we can brand everyone from Aberdeen the same seeing as its Scotlands most racist city? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Romeo Posted December 16, 2014 Share Posted December 16, 2014 Where would you say he was on the balance of probabilities? And if there are only two witnesses is it ok for the panel to decide on who seems more believable, or should they dismiss the complaint? I wasn't there to decide who was more believable. I'd have to ask them both about it. It would certainly strengthened Logans case if there were 2 witnesses. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Romeo Posted December 16, 2014 Share Posted December 16, 2014 this really has some people foaming at the mouth. Utterly ridiculous state to get yourself because people won't post what you want/expect them to post. Group hug anyone? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Romeo Posted December 16, 2014 Share Posted December 16, 2014 I have to warn you, I'm black. In Aberdeen? good luck with that I'd still hug you, maybe more? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THE KING Posted December 16, 2014 Share Posted December 16, 2014 I have to warn you, I'm black. Better move out of Aberdeen then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jamamafegan Posted December 16, 2014 Share Posted December 16, 2014 Racist, disability mocking, whataboutery, that's special. He's a shitebag. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Casual Bystander Posted December 16, 2014 Share Posted December 16, 2014 Well this is a bit embarrassing for some Celtic fans on here. Logan gives his evidence and it ties in with other corroboration and his testimony was believable. Tonev on the other hand was an unbelievable witness and his version of the incident didn't tie in with video of the incident and reports from others. Yet still some Celtic fans will only accept the ruling until Logan is sent a Christmas Card from Tonev which has "Black c**t" written inside it and Tonev's signature. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bobby Skidmarks Posted December 16, 2014 Share Posted December 16, 2014 It answers your question . If you were living in Aberdeen in 2008/09. If you're going to plagiarise, at least do it right, Boss Hog. Please provide up to date figures if you are going to use it in an argument. http://www.scotsman.com/news/aberdeen-is-worst-city-for-racism-1-801768 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted December 16, 2014 Share Posted December 16, 2014 Sellick and their fans have lurched from one disaster to the next on this issue. Car crash stuff. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
welshbairn Posted December 16, 2014 Share Posted December 16, 2014 I wasn't there to decide who was more believable. I'd have to ask them both about it. It would certainly strengthened Logans case if there were 2 witnesses. So racism should be permitted unless there are 3 or more witnesses including the victim? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Romeo Posted December 16, 2014 Share Posted December 16, 2014 So racism should be permitted unless there are 3 or more witnesses including the victim? I don't think it should be permitted at all tbh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
welshbairn Posted December 16, 2014 Share Posted December 16, 2014 I don't think it should be permitted at all tbh. What's your objection to the panel's decision then? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Romeo Posted December 16, 2014 Share Posted December 16, 2014 What's your objection to the panel's decision then? At no point have I objected to the panels decision. Maybe you could explain why you think I have? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Romeo Posted December 16, 2014 Share Posted December 16, 2014 Your attention seeking is quite tiresome. that...from you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Romeo Posted December 16, 2014 Share Posted December 16, 2014 I'm not the Supras tribute act here. The way you are squirming and slithering around is pretty embarrassing. Dream on baw sack, if not for Celtic you'd be up to about 4 posts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Romeo Posted December 16, 2014 Share Posted December 16, 2014 If not for Celtic you'd probably be a decent human being. Or maybe not. Well if we are all representative of the football clubs we support you must be an underachieving, past it, multiple failure. You're right, pretty accurate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.