Clarkston5 Posted November 6, 2014 Author Share Posted November 6, 2014 Says the guy who under two different accounts has posted the same shite about 300 square miles of Wind Turbines = 1 Nuclear power station. :lol: That's absolutely true Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pull My Strings Posted November 6, 2014 Share Posted November 6, 2014 113$ eh? Aye right http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-scotland-business-29919072 Can we expect a similar thread every time the price goes up. And down. And then up. Then down. etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clarkston5 Posted November 6, 2014 Author Share Posted November 6, 2014 Can we expect a similar thread every time the price goes up. And down. And then up. Then down. etc. The leader of the Scottish referendum movement informed us of the wealth and the price of 113$. I'm merely pointing out what you've posted confirming that he was talking sh**e Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pull My Strings Posted November 6, 2014 Share Posted November 6, 2014 The leader of the Scottish referendum movement informed us of the wealth and the price of 113$. I'm merely pointing out what you've posted confirming that he was talking sh**e In English please. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
strichener Posted November 6, 2014 Share Posted November 6, 2014 That's absolutely true I call bullshit. As I have on previous occasions. However after reading your "contribution" to the thread about climate change I know how open your mind is to evidence and will therefore just continue to call you out anytime I see you attempt to ridicule someone else. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reynard Posted November 6, 2014 Share Posted November 6, 2014 Salmond told us £113 was his "conservative estimate". The man is a fucking balloon and thankfully those of us with a clue sent that fat fucker packing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clarkston5 Posted November 6, 2014 Author Share Posted November 6, 2014 I call bullshit. As I have on previous occasions. However after reading your "contribution" to the thread about climate change I know how open your mind is to evidence and will therefore just continue to call you out anytime I see you attempt to ridicule someone else. ^^ Yes voter Bingo imo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colkitto Posted November 6, 2014 Share Posted November 6, 2014 Salmond told us £113 was his "conservative estimate". The man is a fucking balloon and thankfully those of us with a clue sent that fat fucker packing. Give it up Clarkston5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Romeo Posted November 6, 2014 Share Posted November 6, 2014 Salmond told us £113 was his "conservative estimate". The man is a fucking balloon and thankfully those of us with a clue sent that fat fucker packing. He obviously has you absolutely raging. Also stop using your alias to give yourself greenies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reynard Posted November 6, 2014 Share Posted November 6, 2014 He obviously has you absolutely raging. Also stop using your alias to give yourself greenies. I don't need an alias to get right up morons noses. If you're in any doubt ask a mod and they will tell you. Can you explain in great detail please just how the Scottish economy would be affected by the decreased tax revenues from the north sea, particularly when the entire bullshit dreamed up as an economic policy was allegedly based on $113 a barrel? No wonder you fucktards lost so heavily. Never mind, maybe another 20 years of fucking up Scottish education and dumbing down might leave enough pond life around to carry the day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
itzdrk Posted November 6, 2014 Share Posted November 6, 2014 If you're in any doubt ask a mod and they will tell you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reynard Posted November 6, 2014 Share Posted November 6, 2014 So why don't you? Scared you'll make a c**t of yourself yet again? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
itzdrk Posted November 6, 2014 Share Posted November 6, 2014 Right. Don't think you need to be an expert on oil to see how much it's selling for. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
itzdrk Posted November 6, 2014 Share Posted November 6, 2014 So why don't you? Scared you'll make a c**t of yourself yet again? ^ ^ ^ I have no idea what this bitch is babbling on about Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reynard Posted November 6, 2014 Share Posted November 6, 2014 So anyway... Any member of the NCC got a clue what would have happened to the SNPs spending plans with oil dropping in price so dramatically? How would they have "saved the poors"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
strichener Posted November 6, 2014 Share Posted November 6, 2014 I don't need an alias to get right up morons noses. If you're in any doubt ask a mod and they will tell you. Can you explain in great detail please just how the Scottish economy would be affected by the decreased tax revenues from the north sea, particularly when the entire bullshit dreamed up as an economic policy was allegedly based on $113 a barrel? No wonder you fucktards lost so heavily. Never mind, maybe another 20 years of fucking up Scottish education and dumbing down might leave enough pond life around to carry the day. For example, the Scottish Government Oil and Gas Analytical Bulletin made forecasts for 2017/18 based on an oil price of $113 dollars a barrel. 2017/18 Understand yet? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
itzdrk Posted November 6, 2014 Share Posted November 6, 2014 Understand yet? Aye but right now ken Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reynard Posted November 6, 2014 Share Posted November 6, 2014 Warning to anyone responding this this question. If you disagree with him you'll be attacked on all sides from his other aliases. You've been warned. Make good decisions people. Now that you've attempted the ad hominem, would you care to turn the vastness of your intellect to a fairly simple question? Or do you want to walk hand in hand with a bunch of plook faced scheme goblins and make a twat of yourself alongside them? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Romeo Posted November 6, 2014 Share Posted November 6, 2014 I don't need an alias to get right up morons noses. If you're in any doubt ask a mod and they will tell you. Can you explain in great detail please just how the Scottish economy would be affected by the decreased tax revenues from the north sea, particularly when the entire bullshit dreamed up as an economic policy was allegedly based on $113 a barrel? No wonder you fucktards lost so heavily. Never mind, maybe another 20 years of fucking up Scottish education and dumbing down might leave enough pond life around to carry the day. ^^^ heads gone Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pull My Strings Posted November 6, 2014 Share Posted November 6, 2014 Now that you've attempted the ad hominem, would you care to turn the vastness of your intellect to a fairly simple question? Or do you want to walk hand in hand with a bunch of plook faced scheme goblins and make a twat of yourself alongside them? So, is it fair to say that those who disagree with you are plook faced scheme goblins and twats? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.