AUFC90 Posted November 22, 2014 Share Posted November 22, 2014 ^^ Proves my point Answer it then, what has extracting North sea oil got to do with powering the grid ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clarkston5 Posted November 22, 2014 Share Posted November 22, 2014 I don't really care whether you doubt it or not. What do we do when the nuclear raw materials run out and then the gas runs out and the coal and the oil etc? What do we do? It's a very simple question. It doesn't need personal abuse to be able to answer it. Answer it then, what has extracting North sea oil got to do with powering the grid ? I was responding to another poster who was talking about what we would do when fossil fuels run out and I questioned why he would vote for the SNP with their absolute faith in Oil as a wealth creator for the country. As for your question, it'd be expensive but it could be done and would certainly generate more power than wind turbines which are inefficient and also expensive. Do you vote for the SNP then? I assume you vote Green. If not you're a f**king hypocrite. HTH Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baxter Parp Posted November 22, 2014 Share Posted November 22, 2014 He claimed that power couldn't be generated from oil. Then he claimed that it could and then he told me that I was 'thick'. You surprised by his IQ too? He's on a par with you. Yes voters don't surprise me after reading The White Paper He did none of those things you astonishing cretin. He pointed out that oil isn't used for power generation in Scotland therefore your point was as wrong and dimwitted as all your other ones. Really, you're just proving the theory that no voters only voted no because they haven't got the brain power to tie a shoelace. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clarkston5 Posted November 22, 2014 Share Posted November 22, 2014 He did none of those things you astonishing cretin. He pointed out that oil isn't used for power generation in Scotland therefore your point was as wrong and dimwitted as all your other ones. Really, you're just proving the theory that no voters only voted no because they haven't got the brain power to tie a shoelace. Wrong oaksoft, on 22 Nov 2014 - 10:26, said: I don't really care whether you doubt it or not. What do we do when the nuclear raw materials run out and then the gas runs out and the coal and the oil etc? What do we do? It's a very simple question. It doesn't need personal abuse to be able to answer it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baxter Parp Posted November 22, 2014 Share Posted November 22, 2014 Wrong oaksoft, on 22 Nov 2014 - 10:26, said: I don't really care whether you doubt it or not. What do we do when the nuclear raw materials run out and then the gas runs out and the coal and the oil etc? What do we do? It's a very simple question. It doesn't need personal abuse to be able to answer it. Jesus that's not even the post you were replying to and it doesn't back up your claim in any way whatsoever. The thing about deceit is you have to be reasonably intelligent to be successful, you just don't have the cells, chum. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clarkston5 Posted November 22, 2014 Share Posted November 22, 2014 that's not even the post you were replying to and it doesn't back up your claim in any way whatsoever. The thing about deceit is you have to be reasonably intelligent to be successful, you just don't have the cells, chum. Yes it was. There's no deceit apart from the line the SNP have spun your chum who you've become spokesperson for. As for cells, yours don't seem to be operating correctly Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baxter Parp Posted November 22, 2014 Share Posted November 22, 2014 Yes it was. There's no deceit apart from the line the SNP have spun your chum who you've become spokesperson for. As for cells, yours don't seem to be operating correctly You should probably read back a bit and gather your thoughts, son. I haven't commented on that post nor does it back your claim that he claimed that oil can't be used for power generation. Furthermore it seems to have escaped your notice that the oil will run out whether the SNP are in power or not. I await your reply full of further quotes taken out of context and non sequiturs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clarkston5 Posted November 22, 2014 Share Posted November 22, 2014 You should probably read back a bit and gather your thoughts, son. I haven't commented on that post nor does it back your claim that he claimed that oil can't be used for power generation. Furthermore it seems to have escaped your notice that the oil will run out whether the SNP are in power or not. I await your reply full of further quotes taken out of context and non sequiturs. That's a change of tune for SNP voters like yourself. I think you'll find that I asked the poster who he would vote for. At that point which was where I responded to his post is where you should be focused. I don't talk for other posters you see old chap Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baxter Parp Posted November 22, 2014 Share Posted November 22, 2014 That's a change of tune for SNP voters like yourself. I think you'll find that I asked the poster who he would vote for. At that point which was where I responded to his post is where you should be focused. I don't talk for other posters you see old chap Bang on the money, i should've put money on it. Witless twat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HaikuHibee Posted November 22, 2014 Share Posted November 22, 2014 Chernobyl? Yeah the Russians have a great record with their reactors. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_submarine_K-19 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_submarine_K-431 http://bellona.org/news/nuclear-issues/nuclear-russia/2007-09-chelyabinsk-region-residents-still-being-irradiated-50-years-on https://www.greenleft.org.au/node/4227 Its bad everywhere. Nuclear just has high costs. State pays for clean ups. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_meltdown#Nuclear_meltdown_events http://ex-skf.blogspot.jp/2012/06/europe-has-150-nuclear-reactors-to.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
haggis pakora Posted November 22, 2014 Share Posted November 22, 2014 Its bad everywhere. Nuclear just has high costs. State pays for clean ups. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_meltdown#Nuclear_meltdown_events http://ex-skf.blogspot.jp/2012/06/europe-has-150-nuclear-reactors-to.html Oh look the forum clown has pasted a couple of links,that should surely make it true and believable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
strichener Posted November 22, 2014 Share Posted November 22, 2014 Ask the Norwegians. I'm not in the slightest bit interested in Norwegians. I don't pay their fucking bills. No. You pay a higher price per kWh than Norway. A country that generates 98.5% of it's annual energy demand by Hydro. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HaikuHibee Posted November 23, 2014 Share Posted November 23, 2014 Oh look the forum clown has pasted a couple of links,that should surely make it true and believable. Oh look the forum saviour, what about sexism and homophobia which you have clearly showing on this very forum? Or are you one of these left wing apologist? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ClydeNewcomer Posted November 23, 2014 Share Posted November 23, 2014 "It's all a great big lefty conspirashee!" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarkoRaj Posted November 24, 2014 Share Posted November 24, 2014 Why do people respond to Clarkston5 and haggis pakora? Complete waste of time. All they're after is attention Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AUFC90 Posted November 27, 2014 Share Posted November 27, 2014 Renewables accounted for 15% of the UK's electricity supply last year and will account for 30% by 2020. It doesn't work though, lets just spend insane amounts building nuclear power plants Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hedgecutter Posted November 27, 2014 Share Posted November 27, 2014 Renewables accounted for 15% of the UK's electricity supply last year and will account for 30% by 2020. It doesn't work though, lets just spend insane amounts building nuclear power plants What percentage of that are windfarms? If it's rather high then it'll be interesting to see where on earth they'll stick almost the same amount again. Quite like this bit though: "Wind turbines in Scotland alone generated enough electricity to supply three millions homes in the UK - equivalent to 126% of the electricity needs of every home north of the border." If the anti-wind group claim that it's too unreliable though, what's to stop the likes of Cruachan firing up quickly if there's the need for more power if the wind stopped blowing for #X days? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AUFC90 Posted November 27, 2014 Share Posted November 27, 2014 What percentage of that are windfarms? If it's rather high then it'll be interesting to see where on earth they'll stick almost the same amount again. Quite like this bit though: If the anti-wind group claim that it's too unreliable though, what's to stop the likes of Cruachan firing up quickly if there's the need for more power if the wind stopped blowing for #X days? I'm sure I heard on the radio that 2/3 of the 15% figure was wind, so around 10%. Nothing. Hydro compliments intermittent power sources like wind perfectly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clarkston5 Posted November 27, 2014 Share Posted November 27, 2014 Eco BS overload time. "i have an unbiased report that obviates their propensity to burst into flames that says windfarms generate more power than......". GTF Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sophia Posted December 15, 2014 Share Posted December 15, 2014 Dounreay will keep giving 35 years after it stopped contributing in any small way. Its a shame. Here was me thinking that electricity would be too cheap to meter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.