Clarkston5 Posted October 31, 2014 Share Posted October 31, 2014 I don't know why I'm even trying to "defend" myself against a pair of UKIP-cheerleading, climate change denying, anti-working class shiteboxes. I'm pro-EU, pro-immigration, atheist and humanist. My conscience is clean as a whistle. The climate change part I'd be delighted with. If you seriously take on board the recommendations of an organisation chaired by a man who worked as a railway engineer (Pauchari), then you're a sucker. Start asking questions. So put down your copy of "The God Delusion" while watching youtube clips of David Attenborough and listen to alternative opinions and compare. You'll find that the myth of climate change is "An Inconvenient..." Lie! Don't we already have a thread to discuss this, or are The Hardly Boys desperately looking for attention while they ruin yet another thread? Amazing. In a thread entitled "Realistic numbers of SNP MP's", within 24 hours of 2 polls being published showing amazing projections, the debate is one about climate change. It is almost as if some people want to talk about anything but the issue in hand. It almost feels like deflection? I think you'll find the evidence for side tracking the thread belongs to the forum schemie scientist. Rico, you've never written a post worth reading so relevance should be something that should be of less concern imo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AberdeenBud Posted October 31, 2014 Share Posted October 31, 2014 Quite impressed you've read all Rico's posts on 13 days tbh. It's almost like you've been here before and got banned for trolling. No problem with Reynard at all but this one is a total waste of time. Ignore. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AUFC90 Posted October 31, 2014 Share Posted October 31, 2014 Quite impressed you've read all Rico's posts on 13 days tbh. It's almost like you've been here before. If I was a betting man I'd say it's Banterous or maybe even Bairn. I would also say that Haggis Pakora is probably Scothmist because like Scothmist, he wouldn't be able to spell his name if it was laid out in front of him. I'm glad I put the Clarkston troll on ignore. If only people would stop quoting him Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AberdeenBud Posted October 31, 2014 Share Posted October 31, 2014 It's Banterous, he's got the same avatar ffs, nevermind identical cretinous posting style. No idea who haggis pakora is, but he's taken a liking to me. just another Sevco thicko, hard to tell them apart. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kejan Posted October 31, 2014 Share Posted October 31, 2014 Some huge margins for the SNP to turn around in the Labour areas - massive swings required, but we'll see I suppose. I think an excellent achievement would be doubling their numbers and anything more than that . That 6-1 on between 11-15 SNP MPs, looks pretty good value. The key to all this is in the Yes voters who were/are traditional Labour voters, but now not. And if they actually turn out. Of course, hopefully these polls are right and the SNP romp home, but it's a long way away and the SNP will be nowhere on TV in the months before the GE. and of course we'll hear the "vote SNP get Tory" písh too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AUFC90 Posted October 31, 2014 Share Posted October 31, 2014 It's Banterous, he's got the same avatar ffs. No idea who haggis pakora is but he's taken a liking to me. just another Sevco thicko, hard to tell them apart. Can't say I've noticed. How thick do you have to be to use the same avatar Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clarkston5 Posted November 1, 2014 Share Posted November 1, 2014 It's Banterous, he's got the same avatar ffs, nevermind identical cretinous posting style. No idea who haggis pakora is, but he's taken a liking to me. just another Sevco thicko, hard to tell them apart. What you think is of no interest to me you slavering moron Can't say I've noticed. How thick do you have to be to use the same avatar I spotted an avatar and thought I'd use it. However that's me providing an explanation which you'll ignore. Delighted to be on your ignore list Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elixir Posted November 1, 2014 Share Posted November 1, 2014 Sorry, once again we come back to your claim. You chose to denigrate these scientists. I want to know exactly what qualifies a no mark burger flipper like you to determine that a Professor Emeritus, amongst many other scientists, aren't worth their salt. I can denigrate whoever I want, champ. Here on this very forum, everyone does it to politicians, footballers et al despite not being... yup, politicians or footballers. I'm more than qualified with regards to planetary science however and I'll leave you to continue squirming as to what that means. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
welshbairn Posted November 1, 2014 Share Posted November 1, 2014 If I was a betting man I'd say it's Banterous or maybe even Bairn. I would also say that Haggis Pakora is probably Scothmist because like Scothmist, he wouldn't be able to spell his name if it was laid out in front of him. I'm glad I put the Clarkston troll on ignore. If only people would stop quoting him Quite impressed you've read all Rico's posts on 13 days tbh. It's almost like you've been here before and got banned for trolling. No problem with Reynard at all but this one is a total waste of time. Ignore. An exclusive club: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
H_B Posted November 1, 2014 Share Posted November 1, 2014 I can denigrate whoever I want, champ. Of course you can. And, when in fact you are a burger flipping fantasist, who pretends to be an astrophysicist, you will be pointed at and laughed at for doing so, leading to utter humiliations like...well, this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reynard Posted November 1, 2014 Share Posted November 1, 2014 Of course you can. And, when in fact you are a burger flipping fantasist, who pretends to be an astrophysicist, you will be pointed at and laughed at for doing so, leading to utter humiliations like...well, this. I bet this utter spangle didn't even manage to scrape through higher physics, if he even lasted at school long enough to take highers.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elixir Posted November 1, 2014 Share Posted November 1, 2014 Of course you can. And, when in fact you are a burger flipping fantasist, who pretends to be an astrophysicist, you will be pointed at and laughed at for doing so, leading to utter humiliations like...well, this. The only fantasists in this thread are the ones denying man made climate change in the face of decisive scientific agreement. Fantasists like... well, you. Humiliating stuff really. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elixir Posted November 1, 2014 Share Posted November 1, 2014 I bet this utter spangle didn't even manage to scrape through higher physics, if he even lasted at school long enough to take highers.. Did they do highers in wood chopping and shed construction in your day? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AberdeenBud Posted November 1, 2014 Share Posted November 1, 2014 What you think is of no interest to me you slavering moron I spotted an avatar and thought I'd use it. However that's me providing an explanation which you'll ignore. Delighted to be on your ignore list Oh dear, banned from a football forum for trolling and now back as an alias, it doesn't get much lower than that tbh. Please refrain from quoting me ever again, many thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clarkston5 Posted November 1, 2014 Share Posted November 1, 2014 ^^^ Tedious action replay moron Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paul-r-cfc Posted November 1, 2014 Share Posted November 1, 2014 Can't see the snp winning much more than 15 seats tbh. As someone mentioned earlier, the majorities labour enjoy in some of these places are huge and are unlikely to collapse in one election. All depends on how engaged the yes converts are come may as well. Will they see what's best for the continued yes movement and vote sports will they revert to type and back labour to try keep the tories out? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1876Bairns Posted November 1, 2014 Share Posted November 1, 2014 Absolutely delusional if the NCC actually expect to win more than 10 seats anyway. Most of the yes voters are scheme goblins that won't even know there's an election on. vvvvvv pleasing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ira Gaines Posted November 1, 2014 Share Posted November 1, 2014 Use of dece and Reynard patter in the space of two lines. Fucking hell. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sparky88 Posted November 2, 2014 Share Posted November 2, 2014 I think nats confuse voting SNP as suggesting somewhere would want independence , when this plainly isn't true. A vote for SNP is a vote for free tuition and council tax freezes, not independence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Lambies Doos Posted February 9, 2015 Author Share Posted February 9, 2015 Has optimism increased? Last few predictions were around the 12 mark.. I reckon 25 will be about right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.