bennett Posted October 9, 2014 Share Posted October 9, 2014 Andy Muirhead aint a happy bunny over this lol Pleasing as my Jambo chums would say..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Ginger Prince Posted October 9, 2014 Share Posted October 9, 2014 Craig Aye? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cowden til i die Posted October 9, 2014 Share Posted October 9, 2014 Boyd's transformation back into a seething mess has been glorious. Strange how it's coincided with his move back to a club famed for being permanently seething - despite apparently not caring. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
craigkillie Posted October 9, 2014 Share Posted October 9, 2014 Farcical. It's either a banning offence or it's not, making excuses like the nonsense above will ensure the idiots who make these decisions continue to make an a**e of Scottish football. I despair that anyone can come to any conclusion other than the SFA being a joke. I don't think the concept I'm explaining is particularly difficult. Which part do you disagree with? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
topcat(The most tip top) Posted October 9, 2014 Share Posted October 9, 2014 I didn't think Walker's "attempted head butt" was an actual offence either. Maybe we should have disputed that the two week ban. If we had and failed then we'd have a right to moan about Rangers succeeding. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CowdenConvert Posted October 10, 2014 Share Posted October 10, 2014 This .. too be honest it's the correct decision. There's too many incidents reported that are nothing more than handbags at five paces and a heated exchange ... If he actually stuck the napper on him .. then fair enough I see where you're coming from but a line has to be drawn somewhere. It seems to be that any contact with the napper results in a ban these days. SFA being typically inconsistent with the Boyd incident.Where would you like the line drawn that means he has stuck the napper on him. Blood, busted nose, 1 or more teeth dislodged? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Austin McCann Posted October 10, 2014 Share Posted October 10, 2014 I don't think the concept I'm explaining is particularly difficult. Which part do you disagree with? I don't think the concept of players receiving the same ban for the same offence is a particularly difficult one to understand. Which part of the SFA and the ridiculous compliance officer making an a**e of that do you disagree with. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheScarf Posted October 10, 2014 Share Posted October 10, 2014 Definitely an anti-Rangers decision by the SFA IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Austin McCann Posted October 10, 2014 Share Posted October 10, 2014 You mean the same offence where one player is on the deck writhing and the other isn't because nothing really untoward really happened? Aye the same offence where nothing really untoward happened in either. Are you suggesting that someone feigning injury makes one of the exact same offences more serious? It's not difficult it's either a ban or it's not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YIBBIDAY YABBA Posted October 10, 2014 Share Posted October 10, 2014 Imagine the scene if it was a Kyle Laffable or Peter Lovenkrands on the end of that ferocious headbutt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Henrik's tongue Posted October 10, 2014 Share Posted October 10, 2014 Haha is that the wee fella that Broony made an absolute, rip roaring c**t of? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted October 10, 2014 Share Posted October 10, 2014 Didn't Broonaldo end up a loser that season while Diouf was a winner? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Henrik's tongue Posted October 10, 2014 Share Posted October 10, 2014 Didn't Broonaldo end up a loser that season while Diouf was a winner? Our definition of "winners" differs greatly Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cyderspaceman Posted October 10, 2014 Share Posted October 10, 2014 And the helping hand towards Rangers begins. continues...... FTFY Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.