Casual Bystander Posted August 29, 2014 Author Share Posted August 29, 2014 Surely killing a man in the name of Allah in a horrific manner in order to spread fear among believers in EXACTLY what Islamic terrorism is about? As I say, such a shame, you were very fair minded at the start of this thread and then you descend into tomfoolery. The killers of Mr Donald was convicted of a racially motivated murder, not under any terrorism law. While obviously a serious and concerning incident, I feel that the Procurator Fiscal would have a greater understanding of the motivations of the men than you do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boabinoban Posted August 29, 2014 Share Posted August 29, 2014 Here's an interesting video. Makes you proud to be part of the UK: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Bairn Posted August 29, 2014 Share Posted August 29, 2014 Mr Donald certainly wasn't convicted of anything. Nice if you to try and turn that terrorists into the good guys though. Disappointing that so many in the Yes campaign think extreme Islam is acceptable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Casual Bystander Posted August 29, 2014 Author Share Posted August 29, 2014 Mr Donald certainly wasn't convicted of anything. No indeed a typo, it was clearly meant to read "the killers of". Nice if you to try and turn that terrorists into the good guys though. Disappointing that so many in the Yes campaign think extreme Islam is acceptable. And this is where you crossed the border from stupidity into utter farce. Well done. Clearly that is not what is going on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AUFC90 Posted August 29, 2014 Share Posted August 29, 2014 Oh dear Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pars fan Posted August 29, 2014 Share Posted August 29, 2014 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
strichener Posted August 29, 2014 Share Posted August 29, 2014 Mr Donald certainly wasn't convicted of anything. Nice if you to try and turn that terrorists into the good guys though. Disappointing that so many in the Yes campaign think extreme Islam is acceptable. For fux sake. If you think that is extreme Islam then I guess you better never visit Saudi. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mjw Posted August 29, 2014 Share Posted August 29, 2014 For fux sake. If you think that is extreme Islam then I guess you better never visit Saudi. He never leaves his kitchen,he should be safe enough! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Bairn Posted August 29, 2014 Share Posted August 29, 2014 Wasn't planning to. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ross. Posted August 29, 2014 Share Posted August 29, 2014 Surely killing a man in the name of Allah in a horrific manner in order to spread fear among believers in EXACTLY what Islamic terrorism is about? Tony Blair and George Bush have both stated that they went to war in the middle east because they knew it was what their god wanted. Britain and the USA are terrorists. You're still a twat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yoda Posted August 29, 2014 Share Posted August 29, 2014 Christ reading more about that case makes it sound even worse. Donald wasn't even part of thee hire gang that provoked Shahid and his accomplices at a nightclub, they murdered him BECAUSE he was white. If that isn't terrorism I don't know what is. Clearly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Confidemus Posted August 29, 2014 Share Posted August 29, 2014 I realise you're a troll Mr Bairn, and you enjoy the reaction, but you can't enjoy everyone thinking you're a weapons grade f**k-knuckle, can you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
forever_blue Posted August 29, 2014 Share Posted August 29, 2014 This thread is a fucking abortion of a thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Casual Bystander Posted August 29, 2014 Author Share Posted August 29, 2014 This thread is a fucking abortion of a thread. Well it started off OK, just that someone jumped the shark and started to indulge in flights of fantasy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
San Starko Rover Posted August 29, 2014 Share Posted August 29, 2014 An iScotland's risk of terrorism would be dependent on our foreign policy AQ don't just attack random countries they attack countries that are involved in the Middle East we would only be a target if we continued to be involved in the Middle East. Yes we would be far from liked by them for our past involvement but despite our past UK connection it would be a really strange move for the likes of AQ to attack us if we have pulled our involvement in the area after independence as this would result in us then becoming involved in the area and sending troops. The whole point of attacks like the Bali bombing and Madrid bombing was to get these countries to remove their troops, assuming iScotland adopted a policy of non involvement attacking Scotland would be the exact opposite of their operating procedures as it would be counter productive to their aim AQ don't want to fight extra troops they may be extreme but they aren't stupid. However if we maintained an interest in the Gulf or backed rUK/USA we would be 100% fair game for them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Bairn Posted August 29, 2014 Share Posted August 29, 2014 Yep. Just keep our troops out and LET Al Qaeda win. Disgusting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Casual Bystander Posted August 29, 2014 Author Share Posted August 29, 2014 Yep. Just keep our troops out and LET Al Qaeda win. Disgusting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
San Starko Rover Posted August 29, 2014 Share Posted August 29, 2014 If you feel so strongly please feel free to pick up one of these and head to Brize Norton Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BerwickMad Posted August 29, 2014 Share Posted August 29, 2014 An iScotland's risk of terrorism would be dependent on our foreign policy AQ don't just attack random countries they attack countries that are involved in the Middle East we would only be a target if we continued to be involved in the Middle East. Yes we would be far from liked by them for our past involvement but despite our past UK connection it would be a really strange move for the likes of AQ to attack us if we have pulled our involvement in the area after independence as this would result in us then becoming involved in the area and sending troops. The whole point of attacks like the Bali bombing and Madrid bombing was to get these countries to remove their troops, assuming iScotland adopted a policy of non involvement attacking Scotland would be the exact opposite of their operating procedures as it would be counter productive to their aim AQ don't want to fight extra troops they may be extreme but they aren't stupid. However if we maintained an interest in the Gulf or backed rUK/USA we would be 100% fair game for them. Taking away what has gone before, would you rather we (the west) have no involvement in the Middle East? Personally, I'd rather come from a country who tried to help those being persecuted by IS, than just sit back and say it isn't our problem. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
San Starko Rover Posted August 29, 2014 Share Posted August 29, 2014 Taking away what has gone before, would you rather we (the west) have no involvement in the Middle East? Personally, I'd rather come from a country who tried to help those being persecuted by IS, than just sit back and say it isn't our problem. Thanks for actually reading what I wrote and realising it is not my personal opinion, I believe we should maintain some involvement which does keep us as a target however I do not support the blind following of the USA that Westminster does. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.