Clyde4life Posted June 16, 2014 Share Posted June 16, 2014 For all the masses who want to discuss this and to save other threads from descending into a tit for tat argument. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cfcuk Posted June 16, 2014 Share Posted June 16, 2014 For all the masses who want to discuss this and to save other threads from descending into a tit for tat argument. This will never catch on:) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JakeSAFC Posted June 16, 2014 Share Posted June 16, 2014 What's actually happening with this? Are Clyde still going through with it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
clyde_darren Posted June 16, 2014 Share Posted June 16, 2014 What's actually happening with this? Are Clyde still going through with it?You tell me! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cfcuk Posted June 16, 2014 Share Posted June 16, 2014 It should read move to EK and name change council won't sell them the land to build the stadium as 1.8 million to be repaid if so (apparently ) At a recent meeting EKFC management stated they plan to be in the league in 5 years so if clyde went there that would be two professional teams in EK, unless the plan as some think that it will be a merger of the two teams , only an opinion but doubt the board would get a yes if they held another vote now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JakeSAFC Posted June 16, 2014 Share Posted June 16, 2014 You tell me! If I knew I would Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mantis Toboggan Posted June 16, 2014 Share Posted June 16, 2014 This will be an utter train wreck of a thread, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Highlandmagyar Posted June 16, 2014 Share Posted June 16, 2014 Dear old Clyde. Always good for a giggle. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
houstonspider Posted June 17, 2014 Share Posted June 17, 2014 It should read move to EK and name change council won't sell them the land to build the stadium as 1.8 million to be repaid if so (apparently ) At a recent meeting EKFC management stated they plan to be in the league in 5 years so if clyde went there that would be two professional teams in EK, unless the plan as some think that it will be a merger of the two teams , only an opinion but doubt the board would get a yes if they held another vote now.It would be a welcome new derby each season EKFC v EK Clyde. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ClydeNewcomer Posted June 17, 2014 Share Posted June 17, 2014 I highly doubt the name change will happen I really really hope so. The people who voted for the name change of this old club should be ashamed of themselves. Moving stadiums is fine but changing the clubs name is beyond vile Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Replays Posted June 17, 2014 Share Posted June 17, 2014 Well this'll be fun. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cannibal Posted June 17, 2014 Share Posted June 17, 2014 Is there anything stopping an owner/owners proposing a vote to scrap the name change? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShawfieldAggro Posted June 17, 2014 Share Posted June 17, 2014 Some of you lot just can't help yourselves, can you?? 'Post all your Ek/board criticism/negative pish here please'. Fuciin hell. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clyde4life Posted June 17, 2014 Author Share Posted June 17, 2014 Sorry Aggro, just felt it better not to pollute other threads that are non related, and leave this open for all to vent on here! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shawfield Stallion Posted June 17, 2014 Share Posted June 17, 2014 Agree with c4l. I can't even go into a Clyde thread these days without reading absolute drivel from the usual suspects who just make everything about EK time after time. At least this way it's contained! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mantis Toboggan Posted June 17, 2014 Share Posted June 17, 2014 It is impressive at times. I liked the fact that some people managed to link the Ferguson appointment to EK. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShawfieldAggro Posted June 17, 2014 Share Posted June 17, 2014 I don't think there is anything wrong whatsoever with conversations, which are mostly relevant to everything concerning the club, growing arms and legs and with important questions being asked. Why shouldn't they be, if supporters (customers) are not satisfied with any number of issues (there are plenty) raising them rather than bury their heads in the sand is supposed to be a good thing. How can people moan at only 550 turning up.on average last year, without knowing the basics and reasons why so many have stayed away....i'm not saying that is the answer, but many of those who have stopped going voice their opinions here and or the OS. Would you rather they didn't care and didn't post at all?? Every question ive heard has been fair. Including those involving the appt of the new management team and whstever has happened to the tale of doom that was foretold. Next, you'll be collared for questioning anything. Its not on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Karpaty Posted June 17, 2014 Share Posted June 17, 2014 Does seem to be a lack of proper discipline in place. No one seems to know what is going on with the move (or if they do, they are not disclosing but when you are a member owned club, isn't one of the rights is to be fully up to date with what is going on?) I would 100% back a vote to revert the name change idea. All that did was stir emotion, en light in-fighting amongst fans and even lost fans and for what? Nothing to change a year down the line and let's face it, there doesn't appear to be any forward steps in place. Having votes on bold ambitions is fine and well but I really do wonder what evidence the board had at the time that they should it would be sustainable. The pyramid came in at the worst possible time. Edit: The club posted a statement last season banning 10 fans just hours after it happened and quelle surprise, it never materialised. There was no need to come out with something rash like that; the board know who was involved that night and all that was required was a quiet word in the ear and it would have been sorted. They are die hards after all but I can't believe that they thought it would have been a good idea to bring John Brown back by choice. The excuse I was fobbed off with was "They were good enough to come down and give us a game" - which still boils my blood just thinking about it. If that game cost the club £2k to be held then heaven knows how we made anything; there was only a couple of hundred in the ground. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shawfield Stallion Posted June 17, 2014 Share Posted June 17, 2014 I don't want to come into a thread about Barry Ferguson or Montrose v Clyde and have to sift through 10 pages of turgid shite that's been asked and answered about 100 times before. It drags the conversation hopelessly off topic. This thread will hopefully help keep all the 'relevant' questions in one place without ruining all of the other ones where fans actually want to talk about on-field matters Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Clyde Man Posted June 17, 2014 Share Posted June 17, 2014 Look, SLC have knocked back an offer of £175,000 for the land in EK because there would be a claw-back of plenty if they did sell it. So things are still up in the air. Things like this WILL take time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.