NJ2 Posted May 20, 2020 Share Posted May 20, 2020 Pretty sure we don't have the 3rd biggest wage bill. 4th is embarrassing enough but you got greedy. Got a trip to Anfield as well which was decent. Derby dominance?That was a great trip. Few cup semi’s and a couple of finals as well. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pozbaird Posted May 20, 2020 Share Posted May 20, 2020 (edited) As a St Mirren fan who could easily have seen my team in Hearts’ shoes - I genuinely feel for the situation Hearts found themselves in. One different result at our dinkydome, and it could have been us. It stinks. It really does. However, if that result had went badly for St Mirren, and we were sitting here watching Gordon Scott and Tony Fitzpatrick scweam and scweam for league reconstruction, for no other reason than to save St Mirren’s ass - they’d be laughed out of town, with Ann Budge leading the laughing. Feel genuinely sorry for Jambos fans, and I mean it - but Budge can fcuk off. Edited May 20, 2020 by pozbaird 7 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pet Jeden Posted May 20, 2020 Share Posted May 20, 2020 8 hours ago, AberdeenHibee said: Heart of Midlothian since the 5-1 game, with focus on the past 6 (yes, only 6) years: Administration x1 Relegation x2 A glorious 1-game European run, knocked out by a Maltese part-time team. Collapsing at home to allow Hibs win the cup x1 Hibernian derby dominance All with the 3rd highest wage bill in Scotland and being propped up solely by a mysterious benefactor pissing millions against a wall. Well done lads. Outstanding failure. Heartsed it. In order- yes,no,yes, yes, yes, no. But the last one - why do you assume the benefactor is male? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arch Stanton Posted May 20, 2020 Share Posted May 20, 2020 5 minutes ago, Pet Jeden said: In order- yes,no,yes, yes, yes, no. But the last one - why do you assume the benefactor is male? Do you think women can't piss against a wall? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC92 Posted May 20, 2020 Share Posted May 20, 2020 7 hours ago, topcat(The most tip top) said: If you're not careful you can mistake 10 wins and 10 defeats for "Hibernian derby dominance " It's also harder to get relegated when you've half of the last 6 years as lower league dross tbf. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
San Starko Rover Posted May 20, 2020 Share Posted May 20, 2020 As a St Mirren fan who could easily have seen my team in Hearts’ shoes - I genuinely feel for the situation Hearts found themselves in. One different result at our dinkydome, and it could have been us. It stinks. It really does. However, if that result had went badly for St Mirren, and we were sitting here watching Gordon Scott and Tony Fitzpatrick scweam and scweam for league reconstruction, for no other reason than to save St Mirren’s ass - they’d be laughed out of town, with Ann Budge leading the laughing. Feel genuinely sorry for Jambos fans, and I mean it - but Budge can fcuk off.I’d normally agree with your sentiment that Hearts have been hard done by but a quick look at the bile on Kickback and my sympathy disappears. Talk of boycotts, joining the English leagues and wanting other clubs to go bankrupt, I thought Hearts had more dignity than the Blue side of Glasgow. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DA Baracus Posted May 20, 2020 Share Posted May 20, 2020 43 minutes ago, pozbaird said: As a St Mirren fan who could easily have seen my team in Hearts’ shoes - I genuinely feel for the situation Hearts found themselves in. One different result at our dinkydome, and it could have been us. It stinks. It really does. However, if that result had went badly for St Mirren, and we were sitting here watching Gordon Scott and Tony Fitzpatrick scweam and scweam for league reconstruction, for no other reason than to save St Mirren’s ass - they’d be laughed out of town, with Ann Budge leading the laughing. Feel genuinely sorry for Jambos fans, and I mean it - but Budge can fcuk off. It's a tough break but it doesn't 'stink'. For it to 'stink' insinuates that it was some sort of fix or dodgy ruse against Hearts. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pozbaird Posted May 20, 2020 Share Posted May 20, 2020 Just now, DA Baracus said: It's a tough break but it doesn't 'stink'. For it to 'stink' insinuates that it was some sort of fix or dodgy ruse against Hearts. I thought if you said something like ‘my holiday was fcuked because the airline went bust, the whole thing stinks’, it just meant it was a crap situation. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RandomGuy. Posted May 20, 2020 Share Posted May 20, 2020 6 hours ago, Frank Grimes said: Genuinely gutted Paulo doesn’t post on here anymore Oh the bravado he used to display My favourite moment was when he trolled Aberdeen fans all summer after Hearts were promoted and then took a 6 month break from P&B after we pumped them 3-1 at Tynecastle. Simpler times His last post was a belter... On 14/03/2020 at 11:33, Elixir said: Would Hertz have really been relegated this season? Guess we'll never know. Too good to go down in the end, imo. Meanwhile, all the nothing clubs will toil financially as the FoH millions continue to roll in. Absolutely delicious chain of events. ... absolute NAP he still reads the site but is too shitebag to actually post. 7 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frank Grimes Posted May 20, 2020 Share Posted May 20, 2020 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Genuine Hibs Fan Posted May 20, 2020 Share Posted May 20, 2020 what a shitebag 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aim Here Posted May 20, 2020 Share Posted May 20, 2020 40 minutes ago, Pet Jeden said: In order- yes,no,yes, yes, yes, no. But the last one - why do you assume the benefactor is male? That's an easy one. The benefactor famously asked for a more relaxed dress code for the Tynecastle board room because "they don't like wearing ties". Given the cultural norms in Scottish business establishments - and Hearts do like to make a show of obeying the norms of the Scottish business establishment - it would have been very unusual for the dress code to demand women wear ties in the first place. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tree house tam Posted May 20, 2020 Share Posted May 20, 2020 44 minutes ago, Arch Stanton said: Do you think women can't piss against a wall? Yes, I've actually witnessed it. Haven't got video evidence though unfortunately. I'm sure google incognito will back me up. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sparticus Posted May 20, 2020 Share Posted May 20, 2020 30 minutes ago, DA Baracus said: It's a tough break but it doesn't 'stink'. For it to 'stink' insinuates that it was some sort of fix or dodgy ruse against Hearts. I've said that all along.Hearts have been plain unlucky here.The right thing has still happened though.They still dont deserve to stay up. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CambieBud Posted May 20, 2020 Share Posted May 20, 2020 What a fucking horrible shambles of a man. He's managed to squeeze some unionism in as well. Westminster, the very boots he licks shiny, would laugh if they gave even the tiniest of fucks. As it is, they don't, so he'll be ushered out of the room and roundly ignored as the hugely inconsequential quisling he is, all whilst he flagellates himself over being in their mere presence. A sad, unrequited relationship for a old garbage c**t.[emoji23][emoji23][emoji23]Well said DA. Absolute poetry! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pet Jeden Posted May 20, 2020 Share Posted May 20, 2020 33 minutes ago, Aim Here said: That's an easy one. The benefactor famously asked for a more relaxed dress code for the Tynecastle board room because "they don't like wearing ties". Given the cultural norms in Scottish business establishments - and Hearts do like to make a show of obeying the norms of the Scottish business establishment - it would have been very unusual for the dress code to demand women wear ties in the first place. Fair enough 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TonyFerrino Posted May 20, 2020 Share Posted May 20, 2020 1 hour ago, Aim Here said: That's an easy one. The benefactor famously asked for a more relaxed dress code for the Tynecastle board room because "they don't like wearing ties". Given the cultural norms in Scottish business establishments - and Hearts do like to make a show of obeying the norms of the Scottish business establishment - it would have been very unusual for the dress code to demand women wear ties in the first place. That could be that very successful woman businessman and a cunning ploy to put people off the scent. She is certainly successful enough to implement such a successful ploy and probably stupid enough to be involved with contributing to these 'mystery' donations. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
topcat(The most tip top) Posted May 20, 2020 Share Posted May 20, 2020 In order- yes,no,yes, yes, yes, no. But the last one - why do you assume the benefactor is male?Doesn’t everyone know who he is? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Insaintee Posted May 20, 2020 Share Posted May 20, 2020 2 hours ago, Aim Here said: That's an easy one. The benefactor famously asked for a more relaxed dress code for the Tynecastle board room because "they don't like wearing ties". Given the cultural norms in Scottish business establishments - and Hearts do like to make a show of obeying the norms of the Scottish business establishment - it would have been very unusual for the dress code to demand women wear ties in the first place. Maybe Anne just wanted a bit of Levin's bear chest to ogle 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Insaintee Posted May 20, 2020 Share Posted May 20, 2020 1 hour ago, TonyFerrino said: That could be that very successful woman businessman and a cunning ploy to put people off the scent. She is certainly successful enough to implement such a successful ploy and probably stupid enough to be involved with contributing to these 'mystery' donations. No she isn't 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.