hedrum-NO-drum Posted April 10, 2014 Share Posted April 10, 2014 We all know what delicate wee flowers No voters are. This type of unchecked aggression is typical of the type of violence, monstering and everyday abuse they have to endure in their eternal struggle to quieten us nasty Yes voters. lack of an education is an extraordinary handicap when you're trying to be offensive. you make my point perfectly. so why don't you go forth and multiply yourself. thank you Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Confidemus Posted April 10, 2014 Share Posted April 10, 2014 lack of an education is an extraordinary handicap when you're trying to be offensive. you make my point perfectly. so why don't you go forth and multiply yourself. thank you Clearly your superior education didn't extend to you needing to use a capital letter after a full stop. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hedrum-NO-drum Posted April 10, 2014 Share Posted April 10, 2014 Clearly your superior education didn't extend to you needing to use a capital letter after a full stop. in football parlance, you've just been humped. oh and you forgot to add "so there!" at the end. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeeTillEhDeh Posted April 10, 2014 Share Posted April 10, 2014 We all know what delicate wee flowers No voters are. This type of unchecked aggression is typical of the type of violence, monstering and everyday abuse they have to endure in their eternal struggle to quieten us nasty Yes voters. Stop exaggerating - a few morons from the SDL are not representative of No voters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baxter Parp Posted April 10, 2014 Share Posted April 10, 2014 Stop exaggerating - a few morons from the SDL are not representative of No voters. That principle should hold good for the yes campaign, right? Except yes voters and campaigners haven't resorted to violence yet, of course. So where are the articles condemning Unionist intemperate language and aggression? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hedrum-NO-drum Posted April 10, 2014 Share Posted April 10, 2014 That principle should hold good for the yes campaign, right? Except yes voters and campaigners haven't resorted to violence yet, of course. So where are the articles condemning Unionist intemperate language and aggression? i'm sorry baxter parp, but i have witnessed punch-ups started by sympathizers from both camps.in my opinion these incidents will undoubtedly escalate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Confidemus Posted April 10, 2014 Share Posted April 10, 2014 i have witnessed punch-ups started by sympathizers from both camps. Did ye aye? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heidthebaw Posted April 10, 2014 Share Posted April 10, 2014 Here's a link for anyone wanting to see the real face of the online unionist. Funny how these bams don't get covered in the MSM in any article regarding online abuse in the Indy debate. I'd be ashamed if I was on the same side as these bams in anything. https://twitter.com/BritNatAbuseBot The only fights I've heard of are those attempts by NO supporters trying to provoke YES supporters. Heedrum yer talking pish without evidence to back up your claim about YES and NO 'sympathizers' having a pop at each other. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
H_B Posted April 10, 2014 Share Posted April 10, 2014 Here's a link for anyone wanting to see the real face of the online unionist. Funny how these bams don't get covered in the MSM in any article regarding online abuse in the Indy debate. I'd be ashamed if I was on the same side as these bams in anything. https://twitter.com/BritNatAbuseBot The only fights I've heard of are those attempts by NO supporters trying to provoke YES supporters. Heedrum yer talking pish without evidence to back up your claim about YES and NO 'sympathizers' having a pop at each other. How ashamed are you that you are "on the same side" as Siol nan Gaidheal? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hedrum-NO-drum Posted April 10, 2014 Share Posted April 10, 2014 Did ye aye? How ashamed are you that you are "on the same side" as Siol nan Gaidheal? does the snp still prohibit membership of this shower. if so they should say it in gaelic or the scots language, as it probably the only language they (soil nan gaidheal) understand.come to think of it why don't the yes side post in one of these languages. english must be an anathema to them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hedrum-NO-drum Posted April 10, 2014 Share Posted April 10, 2014 Did ye aye? when will you change you handle to conidium, as your begining to make as much sense as a castrated funguy, or more correctly fungi. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hedrum-NO-drum Posted April 10, 2014 Share Posted April 10, 2014 Here's a link for anyone wanting to see the real face of the online unionist. Funny how these bams don't get covered in the MSM in any article regarding online abuse in the Indy debate. I'd be ashamed if I was on the same side as these bams in anything. https://twitter.com/BritNatAbuseBot The only fights I've heard of are those attempts by NO supporters trying to provoke YES supporters. Heedrum yer talking pish without evidence to back up your claim about YES and NO 'sympathizers' having a pop at each other. i don't have any evidence other than my own testimony. when i do get the evidence i will be sure to let you have it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Im_Rodger Posted May 20, 2014 Share Posted May 20, 2014 That really awkward moment when the worst thing about him was the shouting the rest were valid points! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Im_Rodger Posted May 20, 2014 Share Posted May 20, 2014 Those pesky unionists!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Todders Posted May 20, 2014 Author Share Posted May 20, 2014 I'd rather have my car windows panned in than my face. https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=460660597370689 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DAVE M Posted May 20, 2014 Share Posted May 20, 2014 The best way to combat the aggressive cybernat attack is to just keep it light-hearted until the final vote comes in, after which they will all f**k off naturally, Its hilarious how everyone is sudddenly an expert on possibly the most factless debate the planet has ever seen. LOL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Im_Rodger Posted May 20, 2014 Share Posted May 20, 2014 The best way to combat the aggressive cybernat attack is to just keep it light-hearted until the final vote comes in, after which they will all f**k off naturally, Its hilarious how everyone is sudddenly an expert on possibly the most factless debate the planet has ever seen. LOL I couldn't agree more but I think it's a battle ground for politicians to score points against each other IMO I don't care which side you are on at least you're not a CNat! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Im_Rodger Posted May 21, 2014 Share Posted May 21, 2014 I'd rather have my car windows panned in than my face. https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=460660597370689 I couldn't care any less about this guy that went into a Rangers bar with a pro independence mindset if he was really that bad he should of phoned the police rather than taken a selfie. IMO this is heavily exaggerated. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Todders Posted May 21, 2014 Author Share Posted May 21, 2014 I couldn't care any less about this guy that went into a Rangers bar with a pro independence mindset if he was really that bad he should of phoned the police rather than taken a selfie. IMO this is heavily exaggerated. He was out leafleting. Where is the evidence he was in a "Rangers bar" (as if that's some sort of legitimate excuse for what happened). You sir, are lowlife if you think what happened to him is in any way excusable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Im_Rodger Posted May 21, 2014 Share Posted May 21, 2014 He was out leafleting. Where is the evidence he was in a "Rangers bar" (as if that's some sort of legitimate excuse for what happened). You sir, are lowlife if you think what happened to him is in any way excusable. He probably started the fight or kept arguing there is many ways to avoid that from happening to you. However can't wait until this is all down and we maintain in the union. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.