101 Posted February 14, 2019 Share Posted February 14, 2019 33 minutes ago, Ross. said: She’ll get to you after she has sent a reply to the 71 other c***s who sent her that message today... Roses are red voilets are blue i thought I was being original i want to sleep with you. would that have gone down better? 29 minutes ago, Slenderman said: Fact that you have nearly 100% battery, alarms set leads me to believe that Tinder lassie/lad will wind up in a shallow grave. I charge my phone at work and have to get up for work, but otherwise I like your logic. 11 minutes ago, port-ton said: You wouldn't have matched with her if she didn't swipe right so it doesn't even make sense that you're asking her if she did too. she's probably screenshotting it to her mates who are all laughing at how pathetic it is. Little does she know that you're planning on feasting on her organs anyway. She might have super liked me and I didn’t return the super like i agree it’s a useless line to use, would I be on tinder if I was any good at this? I’m alarmed that you’re the second person to suggest I’m looking for a victim on Tinder 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NJ2 Posted February 14, 2019 Share Posted February 14, 2019 Roses are redViolets are bluePoems are shite I want to shag you You can have that F.O.C Adam 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
101 Posted February 14, 2019 Share Posted February 14, 2019 3 hours ago, NJ2 said: Roses are red Violets are blue Poems are shite I want to shag you You can have that F.O.C Adam Thanks Ill save that one for someone real special 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sweaty Morph Posted February 14, 2019 Share Posted February 14, 2019 3 hours ago, Adam101 said: Roses are red voilets are blue i thought I was being original i want to sleep with you. Wid 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nutz_the_Squirrel Posted February 14, 2019 Share Posted February 14, 2019 5 hours ago, Adam101 said: I eagerly await her reply With that kind of chat, I'm surprised you even need an internet app to attempt to attract women. 9 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
101 Posted February 14, 2019 Share Posted February 14, 2019 3 minutes ago, Nutz_the_Squirrel said: With that kind of chat, I'm surprised you even need an internet app to attempt to attract women. I know! Terrible eh, I feel we are in the same boat as you have shown your hand with your user name 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark Connolly Posted February 14, 2019 Share Posted February 14, 2019 Message sent at 17.02, still posting on the thread at 22.20. Guessing it went well... 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
101 Posted February 15, 2019 Share Posted February 15, 2019 14 hours ago, Mark Connolly said: Message sent at 17.02, still posting on the thread at 22.20. Guessing it went well... Thanks for your confidence she replied at 21.04 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stellaboz Posted February 15, 2019 Share Posted February 15, 2019 You mean you got "user profile blocked" 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Moonster Posted February 15, 2019 Share Posted February 15, 2019 26 minutes ago, Adam101 said: Thanks for your confidence she replied at 21.04 Was she impressed with your poem? If so, get rid immediately. 6 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Allan Jacobsen Posted February 15, 2019 Share Posted February 15, 2019 20 hours ago, Adam101 said: I eagerly await her reply I'm more disappointed that you didn't have the courage to stand by your first message to her. Unless your second message was a success at which point, disregard my previous comment. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
101 Posted February 15, 2019 Share Posted February 15, 2019 19 minutes ago, The Moonster said: Was she impressed with your poem? If so, get rid immediately. She wasnt, rightly so 7 minutes ago, Allan Jacobsen said: I'm more disappointed that you didn't have the courage to stand by your first message to her. Unless your second message was a success at which point, disregard my previous comment. the second comment sealed it 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Nutz_the_Squirrel Posted February 15, 2019 Popular Post Share Posted February 15, 2019 23 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
101 Posted February 15, 2019 Share Posted February 15, 2019 (edited) 1 hour ago, Nutz_the_Squirrel said: ETA I'm worried that it's taken you over a day to come up with such wit. Edited February 15, 2019 by Adam101 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D.A.F.C Posted February 16, 2019 Share Posted February 16, 2019 Can someone explain how I've been given a warning for putting up the clip from blazing saddles?Mongo is the characters name it wasn't aimed at anyone on here.It means stop what you're doing here comes something.How do you appeal a warning? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sergeant Wilson Posted February 16, 2019 Share Posted February 16, 2019 2 minutes ago, D.A.F.C said: Can someone explain how I've been given a warning for putting up the clip from blazing saddles? Mongo is the characters name it wasn't aimed at anyone on here. It means stop what you're doing here comes something. How do you appeal a warning? You're the Rangers of this thread. Take the warning and stop moaning. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D.A.F.C Posted February 16, 2019 Share Posted February 16, 2019 It's not a huge deal about the warning just more concerned that someone thought I was aiming a mongo comment at them. That really wasn't the intention. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NJ2 Posted February 16, 2019 Share Posted February 16, 2019 It's not a huge deal about the warning just more concerned that someone thought I was aiming a mongo comment at them. That really wasn't the intention.Probably should have said that in your initial post rather than ask how to appeal the warning in this case tbf If you pm dindeleux he should be able to help 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stellaboz Posted February 16, 2019 Share Posted February 16, 2019 It's not a huge deal about the warning just more concerned that someone thought I was aiming a mongo comment at them. That really wasn't the intention.Reported again for repeated offense. 9 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D.A.F.C Posted February 16, 2019 Share Posted February 16, 2019 (edited) 29 minutes ago, Stellaboz said: 37 minutes ago, D.A.F.C said: It's not a huge deal about the warning just more concerned that someone thought I was aiming a mongo comment at them. That really wasn't the intention. Reported again for repeated offense. https://i.imgflip.com/190giq.gif Are you sure it wasn’t just Adam having a go because he called owned on the Danny Devine discussion? Edited February 16, 2019 by D.A.F.C 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.