captain kirk Posted August 28, 2013 Author Share Posted August 28, 2013 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dirtydave Posted August 28, 2013 Share Posted August 28, 2013 http://m.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-22310544 So they didn't really use chemicals directly onto Palestinians as was made out. They used shells with a very small amount, not to kill but to expose targets. Big difference really. And I'd rather not read about anything to do with the Israel/ Palestine war from the anti semitic BBC site thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dorlomin Posted August 28, 2013 Share Posted August 28, 2013 I'm fairly sure the German army would have fired ten that many bullets in half a day in Normandy. And Normandy was almost a side show in terms of numbers (not impact). Bagration a couple of weeks later had nearly 3 million men engaged, about 500 000 of them Germany. The Germans had about 10 000 active on the day in the Normandy region on D Day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~~~ Posted August 28, 2013 Share Posted August 28, 2013 Bullets might have been "cheap" but what about the material used to make them? doesn't come out of thin air. If memory serves me right, i'm sure the Nazi used to tie people together on top of a bridge, shoot one dead which in turn kills the other as he drags him under water to drown. Anyways, this is taking it off topic. I still don't believe we should get involved. its not our place, I used this example asked this question before and nobody answered it. During the troubles in N.Ireland when the British army had been known to kill british citizens, would we have tolerated foreign intervention from say the US?** Would we feck. We have no buisness getting involved, we've done enough damage in the middle east. let the Arabs sort this one out. at the very most we should be helping with a UN peacekeeping force. **yes i'm well aware the IRA had also been killing people before anyone goes on a rant about that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
madwullie Posted August 28, 2013 Share Posted August 28, 2013 During the troubles in N.Ireland when the British army had been known to kill british citizens, would we have tolerated foreign intervention from say the US?** Would we feck. We have no buisness getting involved, we've done enough damage in the middle east. let the Arabs sort this one out. at the very most we should be helping with a UN peacekeeping force. **yes i'm well aware the IRA had also been killing people before anyone goes on a rant about that Well, no, and neither would, eg, Russia have tolerated it over Chechnya, but neither Russia then or the UK during the troubles are Syria in 2013. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AberdeenBud Posted August 28, 2013 Share Posted August 28, 2013 Bullets might have been "cheap" but what about the material used to make them? doesn't come out of thin air. If memory serves me right, i'm sure the Nazi used to tie people together on top of a bridge, shoot one dead which in turn kills the other as he drags him under water to drown. Anyways, this is taking it off topic. I still don't believe we should get involved. its not our place, I used this example asked this question before and nobody answered it. During the troubles in N.Ireland when the British army had been known to kill british citizens, would we have tolerated foreign intervention from say the US?** Would we feck. We have no buisness getting involved, we've done enough damage in the middle east. let the Arabs sort this one out. at the very most we should be helping with a UN peacekeeping force. **yes i'm well aware the IRA had also been killing people before anyone goes on a rant about that Not with chemical weapons though, enrico. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
captain kirk Posted August 28, 2013 Author Share Posted August 28, 2013 How do we attack syrias chemical weapons stock without setting off chemical weapons and killing people,,,with chemicals. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dorlomin Posted August 28, 2013 Share Posted August 28, 2013 How do we attack syrias chemical weapons stock without setting off chemical weapons and killing people,,,with chemicals. Weapons are generally stored in dispersed bunkers to prevent accidental release and increase security. On the whole anyone close to the weapons is highly likely to be a part of the forces guarding them. Also so far as I know it the SOP is to hit stores with thermobaric weapons or HE\thermobaric combinations to burn out the chemical\biological agents. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jagfox Posted August 28, 2013 Share Posted August 28, 2013 It would seem US and us have a lot of intelligence gathering to do before any assaults take place... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
garethbalesstupidface Posted August 28, 2013 Share Posted August 28, 2013 So they didn't really use chemicals directly onto Palestinians as was made out. They used shells with a very small amount, not to kill but to expose targets. Big difference really. And I'd rather not read about anything to do with the Israel/ Palestine war from the anti semitic BBC site thanks. anti-semitic bbc? lol. here is some other proof israel has been using chemical weapons for a long time http://www.expatica.com/be/news/local_news/belgian-doctor-israel-using-chemical-weapons-31715.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AberdeenBud Posted August 28, 2013 Share Posted August 28, 2013 anti-semitic bbc? lol. here is some other proof israel has been using chemical weapons for a long time http://www.expatica.com/be/news/local_news/belgian-doctor-israel-using-chemical-weapons-31715.html He'll show you a real anti-Semite. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the snudge Posted August 28, 2013 Share Posted August 28, 2013 I didn't know Assad was educated in the UK and his wife is British. I think Cameron should wait until the UN report is complete before bombing the shite out of someone. I can guarantee there will be more civillian casualties through UK/US intervention than death through chemical weapons Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dirtydave Posted August 28, 2013 Share Posted August 28, 2013 anti-semitic bbc? lol. here is some other proof israel has been using chemical weapons for a long time http://www.expatica.com/be/news/local_news/belgian-doctor-israel-using-chemical-weapons-31715.html Some Belgian doctor says it, so it must be true. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
garethbalesstupidface Posted August 28, 2013 Share Posted August 28, 2013 yes, as I thought, when you asked for 'proof' you didnt actually want any. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dirtydave Posted August 28, 2013 Share Posted August 28, 2013 yes, as I thought, when you asked for 'proof' you didnt actually want any. Some guy saying something isn't proof lol. Ok I'll give you proof that Israel have never used chemical weapons. 'Motherwell man has today said that Israel have never used chemical weapons.' That proof enough for you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
garethbalesstupidface Posted August 28, 2013 Share Posted August 28, 2013 thats the only proof we ever have either way. there are other reports if you're desperate for them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dirtydave Posted August 28, 2013 Share Posted August 28, 2013 thats the only proof we ever have either way. there are other reports if you're desperate for them. Nah to be honest I'm fed up with it all. I'm off to order a Chinese. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
garethbalesstupidface Posted August 28, 2013 Share Posted August 28, 2013 good idea Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jagfox Posted August 28, 2013 Share Posted August 28, 2013 ^^^ silenced by the illuminati Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skintight Posted August 29, 2013 Share Posted August 29, 2013 ^^^ Hallelujah Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.