Ad Lib Posted August 28, 2013 Share Posted August 28, 2013 Now now: publish these 'comments on Hillsborough' and we'll be the judge as to whether they're 'pleasant' or not. For the record, murdering your own fans is hardly 'pleasant'. Look at his twitter feed from about 24 hours ago. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reynard Posted August 28, 2013 Share Posted August 28, 2013 Haw you! I am 53! A fair few of us are in our 6th decade but can give you youngens a run for your money when it comes to debate or discussion. Aye we're not so hot on animated gifs and this #shite and we don't understand whyy a meme has become a replacement for sensible conversation. However, we can tackle both a decent debate AND a fish supper. I was just stating a fact. There are a few older guys around, but its by far and away populated by youngsters. I'm 43 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WILLIEA Posted August 28, 2013 Share Posted August 28, 2013 Demographics of the site are hardly representative of the wider Scottish society. It just so happens that folk who follow Scottish football in a certain age group more likely to be active on the internet favour independence. Pretty much this! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vikingTON Posted August 28, 2013 Share Posted August 28, 2013 Look at his twitter feed from about 24 hours ago. I don't have a Twitter account and have absolutely no intention of dignifying it with my attention. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
barrysnotter Posted August 28, 2013 Share Posted August 28, 2013 I believe MotownClic busted Ad Lib for some rather 'unpleasant' comments in relation to rioters and ghettoes on this very site, incidentally. I believe you are wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ad Lib Posted August 28, 2013 Share Posted August 28, 2013 I believe MotownClic busted Ad Lib for some rather 'unpleasant' comments in relation to rioters and ghettoes on this very site, incidentally. It wasn't an "unpleasant" comment. It was an accurate description of the group of youths who described themselves as being "from the slums of London". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vikingTON Posted August 28, 2013 Share Posted August 28, 2013 I believe you are wrong. Did an alarm go off in the GUU and you scrambled to the nearest computer? Curious. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vikingTON Posted August 28, 2013 Share Posted August 28, 2013 It wasn't an "unpleasant" comment. It was an accurate description of the group of youths who described themselves as being "from the slums of London". I think you'll find 'unpleasant' is a subjective description. It's not your place to determine whether it was 'unpleasant' or not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ad Lib Posted August 28, 2013 Share Posted August 28, 2013 I think you'll find 'unpleasant' is a subjective description. It's not your place to determine whether it was 'unpleasant' or not. No less than yours, champ. So much for having me on ignore though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vikingTON Posted August 28, 2013 Share Posted August 28, 2013 No less than yours, champ. So much for having me on ignore though. You are on ignore. How it works is I see some of your bullshit filtered through another poster's quote, effortlessly demolish it, then avoid the pain of reading your law trolling/pedantic dissertation/political flip-flop (delete as appropriate). Still waiting on those Hillsborough comments that you were banging on about. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
barrysnotter Posted August 28, 2013 Share Posted August 28, 2013 Did an alarm go off in the GUU and you scrambled to the nearest computer? Curious. Great come back and not in any way irrelevant. Exactly what I'd expect from yourself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vikingTON Posted August 28, 2013 Share Posted August 28, 2013 That would be a 'yes' then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted August 28, 2013 Share Posted August 28, 2013 I think you'll find 'unpleasant' is a subjective description. I think you'll find you are being a pompous arse. If I pumped in your face you'd find it unpleasant. Nothing to do with subjectivity. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ad Lib Posted August 28, 2013 Share Posted August 28, 2013 You are on ignore. How it works is I see some of your bullshit filtered through another poster's quote, effortlessly demolish it, then avoid the pain of reading your law trolling/pedantic dissertation/political flip-flop (delete as appropriate). Still waiting on those Hillsborough comments that you were banging on about. Predictable fail. You responded to my post saying "look on Twitter" despite no one quoting it. I've told you where you can find his comments on Hillsborough. On his Twitter feed from circa 24 hours ago. You don't need to be a member of twitter to read his feed. If you choose not to look at that evidence, that's hardly my problem. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vikingTON Posted August 28, 2013 Share Posted August 28, 2013 I think you'll find you are being a pompous arse. If I pumped in your face you'd find it unpleasant. Nothing to do with subjectivity. Absolutely no-one's impressed by your faux hard-man contribution to the thread, sit down. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vikingTON Posted August 28, 2013 Share Posted August 28, 2013 Predictable fail. You responded to my post saying "look on Twitter" despite no one quoting it. The "look on Twitter" post being slap bang in the middle of my effortless destruction of your contribution. Try again. I've told you where you can find his comments on Hillsborough. On his Twitter feed from circa 24 hours ago. You don't need to be a member of twitter to read his feed. If you choose not to look at that evidence, that's hardly my problem. I'm asking you to transplant a source from one online domain to another in order to support your smears: a perfectly reasonable request. That you refuse to do so suggests that you're either hiding something or, more likely, have realised that your mock offence over a non-issue would merely add to your laughing stock 'status' on this site. No-one's impressed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baxter Parp Posted August 28, 2013 Share Posted August 28, 2013 And david sheffer is a criminal lawyer. According to you, every lawyer ever has a full and comprehensive education in international law. Were you lying? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted August 28, 2013 Share Posted August 28, 2013 I think you'll find 'unpleasant' is a subjective description. It's not your place to determine whether it was 'unpleasant' or not. I think you'll find you are being a pompous arse. If I pumped in your face you'd find it unpleasant. Nothing to do with subjectivity. Absolutely no-one's impressed by your faux hard-man contribution to the thread, sit down. Honestly? This is maybe the worst post you've made - and that's going some. I know your MO. If someone makes a comment that you disagree with then you get abusive or do your 'swing and miss' patter. Sorry to think you are capable of reasonable discourse. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frosty Posted August 28, 2013 Share Posted August 28, 2013 So how am I meant to produce evidence from a deleted thread? Time machine? You know I enjoy watching the Glasgow Law squad humiliated (this week has been gold, what with the endorsement of Project Fear's intimidation tactics and their increasingly desperate deflection attempts), so if the thread existed, I would happily quote you humiliating yourself with your usual lies. Ironic coming from the biggest liar on the site. The truth of course is that you ran away when challenged on your tear-soaked intimidation nonsense. Where are the details of the terrible abuse the pregnant balloon wielding woman was supposed to have endured. I see Mr Rational who got so emotional I assumed he had to have witnessed it first hand hasn't been on to give us the gory details either. Where are the links to the court cases giving the details of the convictions of the loyalist gang of vandals and the Orange intimidating letter writers. Your lies have become so predictable that people are posting what you are going to say next and getting it spot on every time. Along with the tiresome requests to Reynard over the pensions numbers you have become a joke. I believe you must be in the top 5 most effective posters for the No side with the way you are carrying on. Keep it up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vikingTON Posted August 28, 2013 Share Posted August 28, 2013 Honestly? This is maybe the worst post you've made - and that's going some. I know your MO. If someone makes a comment that you disagree with then you get abusive or do your 'swing and miss' patter. Sorry to think you are capable of reasonable discourse. You're not the first to try tone-trolling on this thread, shall we just fast-forward through to your inevitable failure and tear-stained flounce off the thread? Because I really could not give a toss. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.