Jacksgranda Posted February 6, 2016 Share Posted February 6, 2016 I'll send out a tweet. That's a cheep shot. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted February 6, 2016 Share Posted February 6, 2016 Maybe they should do the budgie instead of the bouncy. Sponsored by Millets? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteRoseKillie Posted February 6, 2016 Share Posted February 6, 2016 Sponsored by Millets? They can maybe get a cheap tent for the next AGM, then... -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe schmo Posted February 7, 2016 Share Posted February 7, 2016 (edited) He has seen the band at least one hundred times has a signed copy of the Silk and Steel album above his fire place and his entire house has this wallpaper... He goes to see Five Star rain or shine. If he wasn't such a system addict, he might go watch a different band. Edited February 7, 2016 by Joe schmo 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheLip69 Posted February 7, 2016 Share Posted February 7, 2016 Why have a couple of pages disappeared? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted February 7, 2016 Share Posted February 7, 2016 A whole thread disappeared yesterday. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stonedsailor Posted February 7, 2016 Share Posted February 7, 2016 The Tedi been deleting history again? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted February 7, 2016 Share Posted February 7, 2016 Why have a couple of pages disappeared? Dave King stole them. -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stonedsailor Posted February 7, 2016 Share Posted February 7, 2016 Maybe one of your wee pals was wiped, dhense style. Which poster entered liquidation? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stonedsailor Posted February 7, 2016 Share Posted February 7, 2016 One of Bennetts aliases, he never paid the Wi-Fi bill. Did he enter as Viki and exits as Bennett? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DM5 Posted February 8, 2016 Share Posted February 8, 2016 I think it's fair to say, that the definition of this PlasticRangers Club is that they are no more than a brand. It's universally agreed that at best, their 'club' (stop laughing at the back) has no legal personality. As such, throughout it's history (what did I say about the laughing), it has never signed a player (that's the company), it's never owned a ground (that's the company) etc, etc. The good news is that you can pick up t'history and 54 and counting for a mere 50p (if you've got big hands). Still, you've gotta laugh! aDONis I'm not an expert in Clubs, like you seem to be, but I think you'll find that no Club of any description whatsoever has a legal personality. Therefore they cannot "own" anything. That also includes your Club. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aofjays Posted February 8, 2016 Share Posted February 8, 2016 Club structures When establishing your club, the members will need to select the most appropriate form of legal structure for the organisation so that it can be formally recognised, open a bank account, enter into agreements for hiring facilities, and be accountable to the membership. In this section, we explore the two main legal structures - an unincorporated association, and a limited company - and provide some additional notes about registering as a charity. This is a complex subjec t and we strongly recommend if you are considering establishing as a Limited Company that you seek professional advice You mean clubs have to become companies (or associations)? So everything we've been told about clubs and companies being different is absolute horseshit? I, for one, am shocked. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
williemillersmoustache Posted February 8, 2016 Share Posted February 8, 2016 I'm not an expert in Clubs, like you seem to be, but I think you'll find that no Club of any description whatsoever has a legal personality. Therefore they cannot "own" anything. That also includes your Club. Synonymous. Try searching for that in this thread, you may just find your answer. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aofjays Posted February 8, 2016 Share Posted February 8, 2016 Finance genius Kieran Prior says Rangers chairman Dave King should continue legal battle with Mike Ashley's Sports Direct 14:11, 8 Feb 2016 Updated 15:11, 8 Feb 2016 By Record Reporter PRIOR, a former Goldman Sachs trader believes King should end the joint retail venture. RANGERS chairman Dave King should carry on with his legal battle with Mike Ashley's Sports Direct, says Ibrox shareholder Kieran Prior. The former Goldman Sachs trader believes King should end the joint retail venture involving Sports Direct and Rangers Retail in court. Ashley's gagging order bid on the club – which would block details of the controversial partnership being made public - failed earlier this week. It is thought that Rangers earn only 4p in the pound on sales in its official stadium store. In an interview, Prior said that the deal did not represent shareholder value and that the average leading football club made around 30 per cent of its revenue through merchandise. Rangers have now given notice to end the Sports Direct deal and have indicated that they may challenge details of the existing contract and side agreements. There is concern over the lengthy notice period that could be involved and fears that Rangers Retail would have to buy stock at higher than its retail value among other issues. Prior, a childhood Rangers fan, owns around 2.5 per cent of the club and has invested £1million in the last 12 months. Goldman Sachs? That bunch that intentionally defrauded investors? This sounds like a real ranger man here. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted February 8, 2016 Share Posted February 8, 2016 " Prior has an IQ of 234, although it was once measured as 238 on the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale at university. This was so high that they asked him to retake the test a couple of times." That's almost as smart as Norman thinks he is..... -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aofjays Posted February 8, 2016 Share Posted February 8, 2016 I agree with Kieran, Rangers should look to the courts with regards to the retail contract, Fat Mike is on the ropes. I agree with Tedi, Rangers should spend big in the lawyer market. For every £5 Ashley spends... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stag Nation Posted February 8, 2016 Share Posted February 8, 2016 .Prior, a childhood Rangers fan, owns around 2.5 per cent of the club and has invested £1million in the last 12 months. Interesting. 1. How has he invested £1 million in the last year? AFAIK they haven't issued any shares, so he must have bought existing shares. That hasn't helped the "club". 2. £1 million for 2.5% means he values Rangers at £40 million. Does this "financial genius" know something we don't? 3. Do the bigots know that their "club" is part-owned by someone called Kieran, who doesn't appear to share their religious affiliation? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
killingfloorman Posted February 8, 2016 Share Posted February 8, 2016 Interesting. 1. How has he invested £1 million in the last year? AFAIK they haven't issued any shares, so he must have bought existing shares. That hasn't helped the "club". 2. £1 million for 2.5% means he values Rangers at £40 million. Does this "financial genius" know something we don't? 3. Do the bigots know that their "club" is part-owned by someone called Kieran, who doesn't appear to share their religious affiliation? but, but, but 5 stars said there was no mechanism for investing 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted February 8, 2016 Share Posted February 8, 2016 I'm not an expert in Clubs, like you seem to be, but I think you'll find that no Club of any description whatsoever has a legal personality. Therefore they cannot "own" anything. That also includes your Club. That's not the case though as the rest of us recognise that our clubs are companies with legal personality. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stonedsailor Posted February 8, 2016 Share Posted February 8, 2016 Interesting. 1. How has he invested £1 million in the last year? AFAIK they haven't issued any shares, so he must have bought existing shares. That hasn't helped the "club". 2. £1 million for 2.5% means he values Rangers at £40 million. Does this "financial genius" know something we don't? 3. Do the bigots know that their "club" is part-owned by someone called Kieran, who doesn't appear to share their religious affiliation? You can invest into something without taking ownership. If he gave the club money to pay for a player or players for example then he would see it as investing in the team in the hope that he would see a better return with better results. Was his 2.5% previously owned or bought with the investment mentioned? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.